body size effect
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 151-168
Author(s):  
Kyuma Suzuki ◽  
Shun Watanabe ◽  
Kin-ichi Tsunoda ◽  
Masanobu Mori ◽  
Seiichi Nohara ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin L. Rechisky ◽  
Aswea D. Porter ◽  
Timothy D. Clark ◽  
Nathan B. Furey ◽  
Marika Kirstin Gale ◽  
...  

We used acoustic telemetry to investigate survival of age-2 sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) as they emigrated from Chilko Lake, British Columbia, Canada, to northeastern Vancouver Island (NEVI) from 2010 to 2014. We built on our previously reported results by including an additional year of data and by converting survival estimates into rates (distance and time) to compare across disproportionate habitats. We also refined our survival estimates by including individual covariates in our survival models and by re-investigating the detection efficiency of the final detection site. There was a tag burden effect in 2012 and a body size effect in 2013. Excluding 2010, survival during the 35- to 47-day migration to NEVI (range of annual mean travel time; 1044 km) ranged between 8% and 14%. Weekly survival rate (S·week−1) during downstream migration to the Fraser River estuary, through the central Strait of Georgia (CSOG), and NEVI was 25%–46%, 75%–90%, and 34%–64%, respectively. In addition to marked losses in freshwater tributaries, sockeye also experienced high losses north of the CSOG consistent with earlier results for Cultus Lake sockeye.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyuma SUZUKI ◽  
Shun WATANABE ◽  
Yumi ONOZEKI (YUASA) ◽  
Hajime ARAI ◽  
Hideki TANAKA ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Thomas Alexander Perks

This study explores what difference, if any, the bias in self-reported body mass index (BMI) has on our understanding of the relationship between body size and income attainment. To accomplish this, aggregated data from Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 of the Canada Health Measures Survey, in which information on both self-reported and measured BMI was collected, are used. Based on subsamples of female and male employees, OLS regression analyses contrasting the effect of self-reported and measured BMI on income show that for women, self-reported BMI leads to underestimates of a negative body size effect, whereas for men, self-reported BMI leads to overestimates of a positive body size effect. Additional analyses examining the appropriateness of correction factors to improve the accuracy of self-reported BMI effect estimates suggest correction factors do little to reduce these systematic errors.


Neuroreport ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (18) ◽  
pp. 2029-2032 ◽  
Author(s):  
InSong Koh ◽  
Myung Sub Lee ◽  
Nam Jun Lee ◽  
Kun Woo Park ◽  
Kye Hyun Kim ◽  
...  

RADIOISOTOPES ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 293-295
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro YAMAGUCHI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document