Where we perceive before we look: The distribution of presaccadic attention assessed with dynamic 1/f noise

Already before the onset of a saccadic eye movement, we preferentially process visual information at the upcoming eye fixation. This 'presaccadic shift of attention' is typically assessed via localized test items, which potentially bias the attention measurement. Here we show how presaccadic attention shapes perception from saccade origin to target when no scene-structuring items are presented. Participants made saccades into a 1/f ('pink') noise field, in which we embedded a brief orientation signal at various locations shortly before saccade onset. Local orientation discrimination performance served as a proxy for the allocation of attention. Results demonstrate that (1) saccades are preceded by shifts of attention to their goal location even if they are directed into an unstructured visual field, but the spread of attention, compared to target-directed saccades, is broad; (2) the presaccadic attention shift is accompanied by considerable attentional costs at the presaccadic eye fixation; (3) objects markedly shape the distribution of presaccadic attention, demonstrating the relevance of an item-free approach for measuring attentional dynamics across the visual field.

The Roles of Multiple UNC-40 (DCC) Receptor-Mediated Signals in Determining Neuronal Asymmetry Induced by the UNC-6 (Netrin) Ligand

The polarization of post-mitotic neurons is poorly understood. Preexisting spatially asymmetric cues, distributed within the neuron or as extracellular gradients, could be required for neurons to polarize. Alternatively, neurons might have the intrinsic ability to polarize without any preestablished asymmetric cues. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the UNC-40 (DCC) receptor mediates responses to the extracellular UNC-6 (netrin) guidance cue. For the HSN neuron, an UNC-6 ventral-dorsal gradient asymmetrically localizes UNC-40 to the ventral HSN surface. There an axon forms, which is ventrally directed by UNC-6. In the absence of UNC-6, UNC-40 is equally distributed and the HSN axon travels anteriorly in response to other cues. However, we find that a single amino acid change in the UNC-40 ectodomain causes randomly oriented asymmetric UNC-40 localization and a wandering axon phenotype. With UNC-6, there is normal UNC-40 localization and axon migration. A single UNC-6 amino acid substitution enhances the mutant phenotypes, whereas UNC-6 second-site amino acid substitutions suppress the phenotypes. We propose that UNC-40 mediates multiple signals to polarize and orient asymmetry. One signal triggers the intrinsic ability of HSN to polarize and causes randomly oriented asymmetry. Concurrently, another signal biases the orientation of the asymmetry relative to the UNC-6 gradient. The UNC-40 ectodomain mutation activates the polarization signal, whereas different forms of the UNC-6 ligand produce UNC-40 conformational changes that allow or prohibit the orientation signal.

Integration of Foveal Orientation Signals: Distinct Local and Long-Range Spatial Domains

Human observers can discriminate the orientation of a stimulus configuration composed of a pair of collinear visual patterns much better than that of a single component pattern alone. Previous investigations of this type of orientation signal integration and of other similar visual integrative functions have shown that, for closely spaced elements, there is integration only for stimuli with the same contrast polarity (i.e., both lighter or both darker than the background) but, at greater separations, integration is independent of contrast polarity. Is this effect specific to differences in contrast polarity, which is known to be an important parameter in the organization of the visual system, or might there be a cluster of other stimulus dimensions that show similar effects, indicating a more widespread distinction between the processes limiting integration at local and long-range spatial scales? Here, we report a similar distance dependence for orientation signal integration across stimulus differences in binocular disparity, direction of motion, and direction of figure-ground assignment. We also demonstrate that the selectivity found at short separations cannot be explained only by “end-cuts,” the small borders created at the junction of abutting contrasting patterns. These findings imply the existence of two distinct spatial domains for the integration of foveal orientation information: a local zone in which integration is highly selective for a number of salient stimulus parameters and a long-range domain in which integration is relatively unselective and only requires that patterns be roughly collinear.

Pattern recognition in honeybees: analysis of orientation

The discrimination of pattern orientation in freely flying honeybees was examined by testing their ability to discriminate orientation in a variety of patterns composed of bars, edges or textures. The results indicate that orientation discrimination improves as ( a ) the length of the oriented element is increased, ( b ) the number of similarly oriented elements is increased, and ( c ) when a number of similarly oriented elements are arranged in collinear fashion. The orientation of bars is discriminated better when the bars are spatially homogeneous in intensity than when they are randomly textured. Furthermore, orientation discrimination is better with textured bars on a homogeneous background than vice versa. These findings suggest that orientation is analysed globally and that the strength of the orientation signal increases with the length and collinearity of the pattern’s constituent elements. Furthermore, in analysing orientation, boundaries of objects seem to be less important than internal detail.