This paper aims to show that the Ishango bone, one of two bones discovered in the1950s buried in ash on the banks of Lake Edward in Democratic Republic of Congo(formerly Zaire), after a nearby volcanic eruption, is the world's first known mathematicalsieve and table of the small prime numbers. The bone is dated approximately 20,000BC.Key to the demonstration of the sieve is the contention that the ancient Stone Agemathematicians of Ishango in Central Africa conceived of doubling or multiplication by 2in a more primitive mode than modern Computer Age humans, as the process of"copying" of a singular record (that is, a mark created by a stone tool as encountered inStone Age people's daily experience). Similarly, the doubling of any number was, bylogical extension, a process of copying of any number of records (marks) denoting aninteger, thereby doubling the exhibited number (marks). Some evidence for this processof "copying" and thus representing numbers as consisting of "copies" of other numbers,is displayed on the bone and can still be found to exist in the number systems ofmodern Africans in the region.Unlike previous speculations on the use of the bone tool by other studies, the ancientmethod of sieving of the small primes suggested here is notable for unifying (making useand explanation of) all columns of the Ishango bone; whilst all numbers exhibited forman essential part of the primitive mathematical sieve described. Furthermore, it is statedthat the middle column (M) of the bone inscriptions houses the calculations of theIshango Sieve. All numbers deduced in the middle calculation column relate to aprocess of elimination of the non-prime numbers from the sequence of numbers1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 (although numbers 1 and 2 are omitted). The act of elimination isproven by the display of the numbers deduced in the middle column; namely: 4, 6, 8, 9,and 10 and the subsequent omission of these same numbers from the following listleaving only: 5, 7 at the bottom of column M.This elimination process described above is repeated to obtain the primes 11,13,17,19when eliminating non-primes from the sequence 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.However, only calculations for the sequence 1 to 10 (for numbers above 2) aredisplayed in column M; as if to exemplify the Ishango Sieve method for the benefit ofposterity.