AbstractFor the human observer, it can be difficult to follow the motion of small objects, especially when they move against background clutter. However, insects efficiently do this, as evidenced by their ability to capture prey, pursue conspecifics, or defend territories, even in highly textured surrounds. This behavior has been attributed to optic lobe neurons that are sharply tuned to the motion of small targets, as these neurons respond robustly even to a target moving against background motion. However, the target selective descending neurons (TSDNs), that more directly control behavioral output, do not. Importantly, though, the backgrounds used previously not only lacked 3D motion cues, but also high-contrast features, both of which would be encountered during natural behaviors. To redress this deficiency, we here use backgrounds consisting of many targets moving coherently to simulate the type of 3D optic flow that would be generated by an insect’s own motion through the world. We show that hoverfly TSDNs do not respond to this type of optic flow, even though it contains features with spatio-temporal profiles similar to optimal targets. However, TSDN responses are inhibited when this optic flow is shown together with a target. More surprisingly, TSDNs are facilitated by horizontal, frontal optic flow in the opposite direction to target motion. We show that these interactions are likely inherited from the pre-synaptic neurons, and argue that the facilitation could benefit the initiation of target pursuit.Significance statementTarget detection in visual clutter is a difficult computational task that insects, with their poor resolution compound eyes and small brains, do successfully and with extremely short behavioral delays. We here show that target neurons do not respond to widefield motion consisting of a multitude of “targets”, suggesting that the hoverfly visual system interprets coherent widefield motion differently from the motion of individual targets. In addition, we show that widefield motion in the opposite direction to target motion increases the neural response. This is an incredibly non-intuitive finding, and difficult to reconcile with current models for target selectivity, but has behavioral relevance.ClassificationBiological sciences: Neuroscience