scholarly journals Fixed Low-Dose Triple Combination Antihypertensive Medication vs Usual Care for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension in Sri Lanka

JAMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 320 (6) ◽  
pp. 566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Webster ◽  
Abdul Salam ◽  
H. Asita de Silva ◽  
Vanessa Selak ◽  
Sandrine Stepien ◽  
...  
JAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 323 (20) ◽  
pp. 2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Sheppard ◽  
Jenni Burt ◽  
Mark Lown ◽  
Eleanor Temple ◽  
Rebecca Lowe ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali R Gnanenthiran ◽  
Nelson Wang ◽  
Abdul Salam ◽  
Ruth Webster ◽  
Asita de Silva ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cumulative exposure to hypertension is an adverse prognostic marker. However longitudinal assessments of blood pressure (BP), i.e. TIme at TaRgEt (TITRE), are not routinely assessed in practice. Specifically, the effect of low-dose combination anti-hypertensive therapy on TITRE has not been studied. Hypothesis: Low-dose triple combination antihypertensive medication achieves greater TITRE compared to usual care. Methods: TRIUMPH (TRIple pill vs Usual care Management for Patients with mild-to-moderate Hypertension) was a randomized controlled open-label trial of patients requiring initiation or escalation of antihypertensive therapy. Patients from urban hospital clinics in Sri Lanka were randomised to either once-daily low-dose triple combination polypill (20mg of telmisartan, 2.5mg of amlodipine, and 12.5mg of chlorthalidone) or standard care. This analysis compared TITRE in the intervention and usual care groups over 6 months follow-up, with TITRE defined as percentage of time at target BP. Target BP was defined as <140/90mmHg or <130/80mmHg in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Results: The trial comprised 700 patients (mean [±SD] age: 56±11 years, 58% women). Patients in the triple pill group (n=349) achieved a higher TITRE compared to those in the standard care group (n=351) at 6 months (64±32% vs 43±34%, risk difference -21%, 95%CI -26% to -6%, p<0.001). Almost twice as many patients in the triple pill group spent the majority of follow-up time at target (TITRE >50%: 64% vs 37%, p<0.001). The effect of the triple pill was seen early, with the majority achieving TITRE >50% by 12 weeks. Those on the triple pill achieved a consistently higher TITRE at all follow-up periods compared to usual care (0-6 weeks: 36±31% vs 21±28%; 6-12 weeks: 74±39% vs 46±43%; 12-24 weeks: 77±37% vs 53±44%, all p<0.001). When predictors of TITRE were examined, only triple pill therapy was predictive of TITRE >75% (odds ratio [OR] 3.41, 95%CI 2.30-5.04, p<0.001). Conclusion: Among patients with mild-moderate hypertension, treatment with a low-dose triple combination pill significantly increased time at target compared to usual care. This study also introduces TITRE as a novel outcome assessing longitudinal BP control in trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Tiffe ◽  
Caroline Morbach ◽  
Viktoria Rücker ◽  
Götz Gelbrich ◽  
Martin Wagner ◽  
...  

Background. Effective antihypertensive treatment depends on patient compliance regarding prescribed medications. We assessed the impact of beliefs related towards antihypertensive medication on blood pressure control in a population-based sample treated for hypertension. Methods. We used data from the Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A-B and Determinants of Progression (STAAB) study investigating 5000 inhabitants aged 30 to 79 years from the general population of Würzburg, Germany. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire German Version (BMQ-D) was provided in a subsample without established cardiovascular diseases (CVD) treated for hypertension. We evaluated the association between inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic RR >140/90 mmHg; >140/85 mmHg in diabetics) and reported concerns about and necessity of antihypertensive medication. Results. Data from 293 participants (49.5% women, median age 64 years [quartiles 56.0; 69.0]) entered the analysis. Despite medication, half of the participants (49.8%) were above the recommended blood pressure target. Stratified for sex, inadequately controlled hypertension was less frequent in women reporting higher levels of concerns (OR 0.36; 95%CI 0.17-0.74), whereas no such association was apparent in men. We found no association for specific-necessity in any model. Conclusion. Beliefs regarding the necessity of prescribed medication did not affect hypertension control. An inverse association between concerns about medication and inappropriately controlled hypertension was found for women only. Our findings highlight that medication-related beliefs constitute a serious barrier of successful implementation of treatment guidelines and underline the role of educational interventions taking into account sex-related differences.


1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 616-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
P D Nigam ◽  
R Ravishankar ◽  
K A Ramachandren ◽  
P C Sikand

Twenty patients with mild and moderate hypertension were treated with varying doses of propranolol along with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily. In eighteen patients ( 90%) the blood pressure control was good. Bronchospasm, congestive heart failure, significant postural hypotension and other bothersome side-effects were not observed. Propranolol has the merit of causing a slow reduction in blood pressure without troublesome side-effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document