A better-quality alternative. Single-payer national health system reform. Physicians for a National Health Program Quality of Care Working Group

JAMA ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 272 (10) ◽  
pp. 803-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Schiff
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-239
Author(s):  
María Teresa Moreno-Casbas ◽  
Emma Alonso-Poncelas ◽  
Teresa Gómez-García ◽  
María José Martínez-Madrid ◽  
Gema Escobar-Aguilar

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e012073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Gómez-García ◽  
María Ruzafa-Martínez ◽  
Carmen Fuentelsaz-Gallego ◽  
Juan Antonio Madrid ◽  
Maria Angeles Rol ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. e845-e855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret E Kruk ◽  
Hannah H Leslie ◽  
Stéphane Verguet ◽  
Godfrey M Mbaruku ◽  
Richard M K Adanu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. e65
Author(s):  
M. Segura Aroca ◽  
T. Gómez García ◽  
M. Lopez Iborra ◽  
E. Alonso Poncelas ◽  
R. Santos Serrano ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (100) ◽  
pp. 986-1003
Author(s):  
Maria da Graça Munareto Rodrigues ◽  
Maria de Lourdes Drachler ◽  
Jussara Munareto ◽  
José Carlos de Carvalho Leite

Abstract A cross-sectional study investigated the effectiveness of an education at work in health program in a Brazilian federal university, by sending an electronic questionnaire to 553 active and former participants (80.5% participation). Means of approximately 3.00 (scale from zero to 4.00) for program’s clarity of purpose, suitability of process, and impact, indicated that the program was largely effective. Clarity of purpose was greater among preceptors and mentors when compared to students. The program’s impact was perceived as greater by the students when compared to the lifelong learning of preceptors and mentors, and by females. Building the capacity of preceptors and mentors for education at work in the Brazil’s national health system could advance the effectiveness of the program.


Author(s):  
Carla C. Keirns

Changes in health system financing and delivery have the potential to save thousands of lives and billions of dollars. The overarching value system embedded in these new models for payment is a rough utilitarianism with origins in economic analysis. These models use financial incentives to change the behavior of physicians, hospitals, and patients. In addition, many of these policy approaches are also based in other normative approaches to medical care with links to liberal economic theory. While these utilitarian-based innovations in insurance and payment policy have often proven to improve access and quality of care in the aggregate, they have frequently been shown to have less benefit or even cause harm to vulnerable populations. This chapter demonstrates how improvements in quality of care frequently have the unintended consequence of widening disparities, either because the populations who had the worst outcomes to start with are more difficult to reach with improved-care models, or because the mechanisms designed to increase access and quality actually destabilize institutions that have long served the poor. As health reforms are implemented, attention to their impact on poor patients and the institutions that serve them will be essential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document