scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Assessing Survival in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer Referred for Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. e183242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing-Keen Yap ◽  
Ming-Chieh Shih ◽  
Chin Kuo ◽  
Ping-Ching Pai ◽  
Wen-Chi Chou ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 106002802096762
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Tam ◽  
Allison J. Schepers ◽  
Angel Qin ◽  
Victoria R. Nachar

Background: Zoledronic acid every 4 weeks (Q4wk) reduces the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with metastatic lung cancer. Lung cancer patients were excluded from extended-interval dosing trials (every 12 weeks [Q12wk]) that demonstrated noninferiority of the 2 dosing schemes. To date, the optimal dosing of zoledronic acid in metastatic lung cancer remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether zoledronic acid dosed Q12wk is similar to Q4wk dosing for prevention of SRE in patients with metastatic lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer with bone metastases who received Q12wk and Q4wk zoledronic acid. The primary outcome was incidence of SRE at 1 year. Secondary analyses included time to first SRE, overall survival (OS), incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), kidney dysfunction, and hypocalcemia. Results: A total of 34 patients received Q12wk and 46 patients received Q4wk zoledronic acid. Incidence of SRE at 1 year (Q12wk, 23.5%, vs Q4wk, 23.9%; 95% CI = −0.184 to 0.192; P = 0.968) and median time to SRE (not reached for either cohort; P = 0.530) did not differ. The Q12wk cohort had longer median OS (24.00 vs 8.97 months; P = 0.022). There were no differences in incidence of ONJ, kidney dysfunction, and hypocalcemia. Conclusion and Relevance: This is the first report examining extended-interval dosing of zoledronic acid in metastatic lung cancer. Incidence and time to SRE at 1 year were similar. This extended-interval dosing may be safe and reasonable for patients with lung cancer with bone metastases.


Author(s):  
M. Kaous ◽  
D.D. Balachandran ◽  
G. Pacheco ◽  
S.A. Mahoney ◽  
J.N.T. Po ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 0272989X2199895
Author(s):  
Adinda Mieras ◽  
Annemarie Becker-Commissaris ◽  
Hanna T. Klop ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
Denise de Jong ◽  
...  

Background Previous studies have investigated patients’ treatment goals before starting a treatment for metastatic lung cancer. Data on the evaluation of treatment goals are lacking. Aim To determine if patients with metastatic lung cancer and their oncologists perceive the treatment goals they defined at the start of systemic treatment as achieved after treatment and if in hindsight they believe it was the right decision to start systemic therapy. Design and Participants A prospective multicenter study in 6 hospitals across the Netherlands between 2016 and 2018. Following systemic treatment, 146 patients with metastatic lung cancer and 23 oncologists completed a questionnaire on the achievement of their treatment goals and whether they made the right treatment decision. Additional interviews with 15 patients and 5 oncologists were conducted. Results According to patients and oncologists, treatment goals were achieved in 30% and 37% for ‘quality of life,’ 49% and 41% for ‘life prolongation,’ 26% and 44% for ‘decrease in tumor size,’ and 44% for ‘cure’, respectively. Most patients and oncologists, in hindsight, felt they had made the right decision to start treatment and also if they had not achieved their goals (72% and 93%). This was related to the feeling that they had to do ‘something.’ Conclusions Before deciding on treatment, the treatment options, including their benefits and side effects, and the goals patients have should be discussed. It is key that these discussions include not only systemic treatment but also palliative care as effective options for doing ‘something.’


1971 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin E. MacGee

✓ Results in 27 cases of intracranial surgery for metastatic lung cancer are evaluated with regard to both the quality and duration of survival; 56% of the patients lived more than 1 year, with the longest survivor still living 32 months after operation. The operative mortality was 26%. These data suggest that intracranial surgery is worthwhile in patients with lung cancer when the cerebral metastasis is either solitary or single.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document