Primary and community health care professionals in hospital emergency departments: effects on process and outcome of care and resources

Author(s):  
Jaspreet K Khangura ◽  
Gerd Flodgren ◽  
Rafael Perera ◽  
Brian H Rowe ◽  
Sasha Shepperd
Author(s):  
Anna Burak ◽  
Justyna Antoniewicz ◽  
Elżbieta Malinowska ◽  
Katarzyna Cierzniakowska

Abstract Introduction. Hospital emergency departments (ED) are places of the highest aggression rates towards staff. In Poland, in the case of violent behavior personnel can exercise the right to legal protection reserved to public officials. To be able to exercise it, personnel should document the course of violent behavior they were subject to. Aim. The aim of the study was to examine whether the staff of ED document violent behavior they are subject to in the workplace and to answer the question: what factors are they taking into account while reporting or not violent behavior incidents. Methods. The study was conducted among medical personnel of six hospital ED in Poland. A total of 282 health care professionals took part in the study. The diagnostic survey method was applied. The data was compiled using Statistica PL and Microsoft Excel software. Results. 43.3% of respondents always document cases of violent behavior and 5.3% never do it. The personnel document aggression mainly for the purpose of their own safety - 44.8%. 40% of respondents who do not document acts of aggression consider it pointless. Conclusions. Cases of aggression are registered in medical records by nearly every second person of medical professional. The reasons for documenting cases of aggression include: concern for own safety, procedures in force in the unit, fear of further consequences.


2007 ◽  
pp. 188-205
Author(s):  
C. J. Fitch ◽  
C. Adams

Community health care seems to many governments to be an ideal arena for mobile technological support. Community health care professionals work within the community, visiting people within their own homes or at local health centres. Mobile technologies offer much potential to support these professionals in provision of patient and care information, access to other professionals and services, and overall improvement of patient care. However, there are several challenges to be met before the full bene?ts can be achieved. At a system level, community health care has many tensions, particularly between national direction and associated funding, and between local needs and practicalities. In addition, technology is not always used and applied as initially expected. This chapter explores some of these tensions by examining an example of community health care support in the South of England.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S66-S66
Author(s):  
S. Saeed

Mental disorders are common [1] and they are associated with high levels of distress, morbidity, disability, and mortality. We know today that psychiatric treatments work and there is extensive evidence and agreement on effective mental health practices for persons with these disorders. Unfortunately, at a time when treatment for psychiatric illness has never been more effective, many people with these disorders do not have access to psychiatric services due to the shortage, and maldistribution of providers, especially psychiatrists. This has resulted in patients going to hospital emergency departments to seek services resulting in long lengths of stay and boarding of psychiatric patients in hospital emergency departments. A growing body of literature now suggests that the use of telepsychiatry to provide mental health care has the potential to mitigate the workforce shortage that directly affects access to care, especially in remote and underserved areas [2,3].The North Carolina Statewide Telepsychiatry Program (NC-STeP) was developed in response to NC Session Law 2013-360. The vision of NC-STeP is to assure that if an individual experiencing an acute behavioral health crisis enters an emergency department of a hospital anywhere in the state of North Carolina, s/he receives timely, evidence-based psychiatric treatment through this program. Aside from helping address the problems associated with access to mental health care, NC-STeP is helping North Carolina face a pressing and difficult challenge in the healthcare delivery system today: the integration of science-based treatment practices into routine clinical care. East Carolina University's Center for Telepsychiatry is the home for this statewide program, which is connecting 80-85 hospital emergency departments across the state of North Carolina. The plan for NC-STeP was developed in collaboration with a workgroup of key stakeholders including representatives from Universities in NC, hospitals/healthcare systems, NC Hospital Association, NC Psychiatric Association, LME-MCOs, NC-Department of HHS, and many others. The NC General Assembly has appropriated $4 million over two years to fund the program. The program is also partially funded by the Duke Endowment.The program has already connected 56 of the projected 85 hospitals in the first 18 months since its inception and over 12,000 encounters have been successfully completed during this time. A web portal has been designed and implemented that combines scheduling, EMR, HIE functions, and data management systems. This presentation will provide current program data on the length of stay, dispositions, IVC status, and other parameters for all ED patients who received telepsychiatry services. NC-STeP is now positioned well to create collaborative linkages and develop innovative models for the mental health care delivery by connecting psychiatric providers with EDs and Hospitals, Community-based mental health providers, Primary Care Providers, FQHCs and Public Health Clinics, and others. NC-STeP is positioned well to build capacity by taking care of patients in community-based settings and by creating collaborative linkages across continuums of care. By doing so, the program implements evidence-based practice to make recovery possible for patients that it serves.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.


Author(s):  
Leah Rorvig ◽  
Brie Williams

The COVID-19 pandemic is devastating the health of hundreds of thousands of people who live and work in U.S. jails and prisons. Due to dozens of large outbreaks in correctional facilities, tens of thousands of seriously ill incarcerated people are receiving medical care in the community hospital setting. Yet community clinicians often have little knowledge of the basic rights and ethical principles governing care of seriously ill incarcerated patients. Such patients are legally entitled to make their own medical decisions just like non-incarcerated patients, and retain rights to appoint surrogate decision makers and make advance care plans. Wardens, correctional officers, and prison health care professionals should not make medical decisions for incarcerated patients and should not be asked to do so. Dying incarcerated patients should be offered goodbye visits with their loved ones, and patients from federal prisons are legally entitled to them. Community health care professionals may need to advocate for this medically vulnerable hospitalized patient population to receive ethically appropriate, humane care when under their care in community hospitals. If ethical care is being obstructed, community health care professionals should contact the prison’s warden and medical director to explain their concerns and ask questions. If necessary, community clinicians should involve a hospital’s ethics committee, leadership, and legal counsel. Correctional medicine experts and legal advocates for incarcerated people can also help community clinicians safeguard the rights of incarcerated patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 91 (11) ◽  
pp. 870-875
Author(s):  
Janice D. Key ◽  
Kathleen C. Head ◽  
Sarah Piwinski ◽  
Kristen Morella ◽  
Coleen T. Martin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document