Rapid Methods for Foodborne Bacterial Enumeration and Pathogen Detection

2009 ◽  
pp. 547-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Feng ◽  
Norma Heredia
1989 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL Y. C. FUNG ◽  
NELSON A. COX ◽  
MILLICENT C. GOLDSCHMIDT ◽  
J. STANLEY BAILEY

Participants of an international workshop on rapid methods and automation were surveyed concerning the numbers of total plate counts and coliform counts performed per year, the numbers and kinds of pathogen detection tests routinely performed, and the type of instruments and diagnostic kits routinely used in their laboratories. The candid opinions on what is needed in the near future and the general perceptions of the field of rapid methods and automation in microbiology and their wish list were also solicited. Responses from 55 professional practicing microbiologists were analyzed. The data should be of interest to educators and the developers of instruments and diagnostic kits as well as applied microbiologists concerned with the current status and future development of the field of rapid methods and automation in microbiology


2004 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN L. McKILLIP ◽  
MARYANNE DRAKE

Quality assurance in the food industry in recent years has involved the acceptance and implementation of a variety of nucleic acid–based methods for rapid and sensitive detection of food-associated pathogenic bacteria. Techniques such as polymerase chain reaction have greatly expedited the process of pathogen detection and have in some cases replaced traditional methods for bacterial enumeration in food. Conventional PCR, albeit sensitive and specific under optimized conditions, obligates the user to employ agarose gel electrophoresis as the means for endpoint analysis following sample processing. For the last few years, a variety of real-time PCR chemistries and detection instruments have appeared on the market, and many of these lend themselves to applications in food microbiology. These approaches afford a user the ability to amplify DNA or RNA, as well as detect and confirm target sequence identity in a closed-tube format with the use of a variety of fluorophores, labeled probes, or both, without the need to run gels. Such real-time chemistries also offer greater sensitivity than traditional gel visualization and can be semiquantitative and multiplexed depending on the specific experimental objectives. This review emphasizes the current systems available for real-time PCR–based pathogen detection, the basic mechanisms and requirements for each, and the prospects for development over the next few years in the food industry.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Zhao ◽  
Susana Diaz Amaya ◽  
Seon-ah Jin ◽  
Li-Kai Lin ◽  
Amanda J. Deering ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Dzenitis ◽  
A J Makarewicz ◽  
D R Hadley ◽  
D M Gutierrez ◽  
T R Metz ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Sheng Lin ◽  
Ming-Yuan-Lee ◽  
Chih-Hui Yang ◽  
Keng-Shiang Huang

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshatha Prasanna ◽  
Vidya Niranjan

Background: Since bacteria are the earliest known organisms, there has been significant interest in their variety and biology, most certainly concerning human health. Recent advances in Metagenomics sequencing (mNGS), a culture-independent sequencing technology have facilitated an accelerated development in clinical microbiology and our understanding of pathogens. Objective: For the implementation of mNGS in routine clinical practice to become feasible, a practical and scalable strategy for the study of mNGS data is essential. This study presents a robust automated pipeline to analyze clinical metagenomic data for pathogen identification and classification. Method: The proposed Clin-mNGS pipeline is an integrated, open-source, scalable, reproducible, and user-friendly framework scripted using the Snakemake workflow management software. The implementation avoids the hassle of manual installation and configuration of the multiple command-line tools and dependencies. The approach directly screens pathogens from clinical raw reads and generates consolidated reports for each sample. Results: The pipeline is demonstrated using publicly available data and is tested on a desktop Linux system and a High-performance cluster. The study compares variability in results from different tools and versions. The versions of the tools are made user modifiable. The pipeline results in quality check, filtered reads, host subtraction, assembled contigs, assembly metrics, relative abundances of bacterial species, antimicrobial resistance genes, plasmid finding, and virulence factors identification. The results obtained from the pipeline are evaluated based on sensitivity and positive predictive value. Conclusion: Clin-mNGS is an automated Snakemake pipeline validated for the analysis of microbial clinical metagenomics reads to perform taxonomic classification and antimicrobial resistance prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document