The Mandatory Performance Framework

2019 ◽  
pp. 31-46
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heikki Mansikka ◽  
Don Harris ◽  
Kai Virtanen

Abstract. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the flight-related core competencies for professional airline pilots and to structuralize them as components in a team performance framework. To achieve this, the core competency scores from a total of 2,560 OPC (Operator Proficiency Check) missions were analyzed. A principal component analysis (PCA) of pilots’ performance scores across the different competencies was conducted. Four principal components were extracted and a path analysis model was constructed on the basis of these factors. The path analysis utilizing the core competencies extracted adopted an input–process–output’ (IPO) model of team performance related directly to the activities on the flight deck. The results of the PCA and the path analysis strongly supported the proposed IPO model.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Grodowitz ◽  
Luis E. Pena ◽  
Curtis Dunham ◽  
Dong Zhong ◽  
Pavel Shamis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 158-161
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Chornyi ◽  
Marek Miłosz

This article presents the results of comparing code developing speeds and project loads across different frameworks to explore which of them seems to be the best choice in the long time. The analysis was carried out in terms of the exploratory study, the design of the sample project and the literature review. Comparison will make it possible to point to a better performance framework and prolong its use.


2001 ◽  
Vol 356 (1412) ◽  
pp. 1209-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel H. Goddard ◽  
Michael Hucka ◽  
Fred Howell ◽  
Hugo Cornelis ◽  
Kavita Shankar ◽  
...  

Biological nervous systems and the mechanisms underlying their operation exhibit astonishing complexity. Computational models of these systems have been correspondingly complex. As these models become ever more sophisticated, they become increasingly difficult to define, comprehend, manage and communicate. Consequently, for scientific understanding of biological nervous systems to progress, it is crucial for modellers to have software tools that support discussion, development and exchange of computational models. We describe methodologies that focus on these tasks, improving the ability of neuroscientists to engage in the modelling process. We report our findings on the requirements for these tools and discuss the use of declarative forms of model description—equivalent to object–oriented classes and database schema—which we call templates. We introduce NeuroML, a mark–up language for the neurosciences which is defined syntactically using templates, and its specific component intended as a common format for communication between modelling–related tools. Finally, we propose a template hierarchy for this modelling component of NeuroML, sufficient for describing models ranging in structural levels from neuron cell membranes to neural networks. These templates support both a framework for user–level interaction with models, and a high–performance framework for efficient simulation of the models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian P. R. Pietsch ◽  
William F. Messier

ABSTRACT This study advances several propositions about the effects of time pressure on individuals' belief revisions within a pressure-arousal-effort-performance framework. There is a significant body of research that documents the importance of both time pressure and order effects in an accounting environment. However, prior research has not investigated how the order of information affects individuals' belief revision processes under varying levels of time pressure, even though the inclusion of a time pressure variable has been noted as relevant in belief revision research, both in general (Hogarth and Einhorn 1992) and in accounting (Kahle, Pinsker, and Pennington 2005; Trotman and Wright 2000). In this review, we extend prior belief revision research in accounting by describing how time pressure interacts with personal and task variables and the subprocesses described in the belief-adjustment model (Hogarth and Einhorn 1992). Propositions are advanced on the effects of time pressure on individuals' belief revisions. A better understanding of such interactive effects helps to explain the mixed results identified in prior studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document