Commercial Humic Products

Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
M.Yu. KOSTENKO ◽  
G. RYMBALOVICH ◽  
I.N. GORYACHKINA ◽  
R.V. BEZNOSYUK ◽  
G.A. BORISOV

Целью исследований явилась оценкавлияния обработки горячим туманом биологического препарата Азотовит и гуминовых продуктовГумат калия, Экоростсемян ячменя перед посевом, а также сравнение результатов с общепринятымитехнологиями обработки с помощью протравителя семян этими же препаратами. Для полноты исследований обработку производили и химическим препаратом Атик. Высокодисперсный аэрозоль получали с помощью генератора горячего тумана GreenFogBF-130.Обработку производилис помощью устройства с наклонными полками, по которым зерно многократно пересыпалось под действием силы тяжести и подвергалось перемешиванию и воздействию горячего тумана. В результате разницы температур холодного семенного материала и горячего тумана происходил фазовый переход тумана в жидкость, что позволяло получить тонкую плёнку на обрабатываемой поверхности семянячменя.Это способствовало обеззараживанию и активизации физико-химических процессов в зерне. Экспериментальные исследования включали восемь вариантов обработки и один без обработки (контроль). Оценивались результаты продуктивности и структура урожая: число растений на 1 м2, число сорных растений на 1 м2, число продуктивных стеблей (колосьев) на 1 м2, кустистость на 1 м2, продуктивная кустистость на 1 м2,среднее число зерен в колосе, масса 1000 зерен, высота стеблей, биологическая урожайность. В соответствии с ГОСТ 53900-2010 Ячмень кормовой, ГОСТ 5060-86 Ячмень пивоваренный, ГОСТ 28672-90 Ячмень.Требования при заготовках и поставках,ТРТС 021/2011 О безопасности пищевой продукции из качественных показателей рассматривались массовая доля влаги, массовая доля протеина, массовая доля клетчатки, массовая доля сахара, массовая доля жира, массовая доля золы, массовая доля крахмала, обменная энергия, крупность, мелкие зерна, сорная и зерновая примесь, фузариозные зерна, общая токсичность, микотоксиндезоксиниваленол (DON). Лучшие показатели были получены в результате аэрозольной обработки гуминовыми продуктами Гумат калия и Экорост.The aim of the research was to assess the effect of hot mist treatment of the biological preparation Azotovit and humic products potassium HUMATE, barley seeds Ecorost before sowing, as well as to compare the results with conventional technologies of treatment with the help of seed protectant with the same drugs. To complete the research and produce treatment chemicals of Atik. The highly dispersed aerosol was obtained using The greenfogbf-130 hot mist generator. The treatment was carried out using a device with inclined shelves, on which the grain was repeatedly poured under the influence of gravity and was subjected to mixing and the influence of hot fog. As a result of the temperature difference between the cold and hot mist of the seed material, a phase transition of the mist into a liquid occurred, which allowed to obtain a thin film on the treated surface of the barley seeds. This contributed to the disinfection and activation of physical and chemical processes in the grain. Experimental studies included eight treatment options and one without treatment (control). The results of productivity and crop structure were evaluated: the number of plants per 1 m2, the number of weeds per 1 m2, the number of productive stems (ears) per 1 m2, bushiness per 1 m2, productive bushiness per 1 m2, the average number of grains per ear, the weight of 1000 grains, the height of stems, biological yield. In accordance with GOST 53900-2010 barley fodder, barley brewing GOST 5060-86, GOST 28672-90 Barley. Requirements for procurement and supply, TR CU 021/2011 on food safety from qualitative indicators considered the mass fraction of moisture, mass fraction of protein, mass fraction of fiber, mass fraction of sugar, mass fraction of fat, mass fraction of ash, mass fraction of starch, metabolic energy, size, small grains, weed and grain admixture, Fusarium grains, total toxicity, mycotoxindeoxynivalenol (don). The best results were obtained as a result of aerosol treatment with humic products potassium HUMATE and Ecorost.


Author(s):  
Maria Pukalchik ◽  
Kamila Kydralieva ◽  
Olga Yakimenko ◽  
Elena Fedoseeva ◽  
Vera Terekhova

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Olk ◽  
Dana L. Dinnes ◽  
J. Rene Scoresby ◽  
Jerald W. Darlington ◽  
Charles R. Hurburgh ◽  
...  

Despite growing interest in humic products as crop amendments, very few field evaluations have considered environmental factors of humic product efficacy. We determined the spatial and temporal variability in the efficacy of a micronized humic product on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and grain yield in two rainfed fields supporting a maize−soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation in 2012–2014, and 2016 in central Iowa, U.S. Crop management in both fields otherwise followed conventional farmer practices. In two dry growing seasons, mechanized combine measurements of grain yield increased significantly (P < 0.10) with humic product application on an eroded hilltop soil, amounting for two application rates to 930 and 1,600 kg ha–1 (11 and 19% of the control grain yield) in 2012, the droughtiest season, and 700 kg ha–1 (7% of the control) for the higher application rate in the somewhat droughty 2013 season. On a fertile side slope soil in the 2012 field, though, only a faint numeric response occurred in 2012, while on a toe slope soil the sole significant increase was in 2012, 870 kg ha–1 (14% increase above the control) for one application rate. With favorable rainfall in 2014 and 2016, significant grain yield increases with product application were small in the upland soil of 2014 and absent in 2016. Yield components analysis on 1-m row lengths of hand-collected samples attributed these yield boosts primarily to increased ear length, especially of the shorter ears. Combine grain yields, yield components, and total leaf area all demonstrated numerically slightly greater values for humic product treatments compared to the control in the vast majority of comparisons across years and soil types, with better distinction in the upland transects. Statistical significance, though, was reached only in the droughtier settings. The humic product had no consistent effects on nutrient concentrations of the grain, stover, or young leaves. Grain quality parameters showed a slight shift from protein to carbohydrates in the droughtier settings. Fifteen soil properties showed no response to the humic product. This humic product demonstrated the capability to improve maize growth in rainfed conditions in a high-yielding region, and its efficacy varied predictably with environmental conditions. This finding provides one potential explanation for inconsistent reports elsewhere of crop responses to humic products.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 2863-2867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Filcheva ◽  
Mariana Hristova ◽  
Pavlina Nikolova ◽  
Todorka Popova ◽  
Konstantin Chakalov ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
A.V. Andreev ◽  
◽  
N.N. Kinaev ◽  
E.A. Sagulenko ◽  
A.V. Belov ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 750-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Pukalchik ◽  
Maria Panova ◽  
Mikhail Karpukhin ◽  
Olga Yakimenko ◽  
Kamila Kydralieva ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1279-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Yakimenko ◽  
Daria Khundzhua ◽  
Aleksei Izosimov ◽  
Viktor Yuzhakov ◽  
Svetlana Patsaeva
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 884-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Yu. Gosteva ◽  
A. A. Izosimov ◽  
S. V. Patsaeva ◽  
V. I. Yuzhakov ◽  
O. S. Yakimenko

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 736-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Yakimenko ◽  
V. A. Terekhova ◽  
M. A. Pukalchik ◽  
M. V. Gorlenko ◽  
A. I. Popov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document