Introduction to the Clinical Process

Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 188 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony J O’Connell ◽  
Jane E Bassham ◽  
Rod O Bishop ◽  
Christopher W Clarke ◽  
Carolyn J Hullick ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley B. Olswang ◽  
Barbara Bain

For many of us, not having data concerning a client’s progress during treatment is tantamount to being unprepared for a lecture, or showing up at a birthday party without a present—totally unthinkable. This zealous position is based on the assumption that clinical decisions regarding treatment efficacy should be based on data. Data, in this case, refers to both quantitative and qualitative information that provides evidence for deciding the course of treatment. This is not to say that data can and should be collected on every aspect of the clinical process. Indeed, intuitive decision-making on the part of the speech-language pathologist is often warranted. But in general, a series of decisions regarding whether or not treatment is working, can and should be based on data. This article examines the ways in which we can measure treatment progress, and provides guidelines for the reader in the use of a data-based, decision-making model.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masako Fujiwara ◽  
Tohru Kobayashi ◽  
Satoko Tsuru ◽  
Hiroyuki Ida

Background: In Japan, 2 guidelines are published, the clinical guidelines for medical treatment of acute stage Kawasaki disease(KD)(2012) and guidelines for diagnosis and management of cardiovascular sequelae in KD(2013). Patient Condition Adaptive Path System (PCAPS) is a technique to structure clinical knowledge. It places “patient condition” as a core, to which multiple “target conditions” are linked. On the other hand, patients of KD ware focused the severity of the disease and therapeutic strategy influences the improvement. Purpose: The purpose is confirming the PCAPS KD contents, which complied two Japanese Guidelines and to evaluate adaption of the contents. Methods: PCAPS content is composed of Clinical Process Chart (CPC) and Unit Sheet (US).CPC is an overhead view of clinical path consisting of a chain of units. CPC was made according the guidelines, and coronary evaluation, CHF, cardiac catheterization and ACS unit can activate on time. CPC stratify the patient’s severity. US are composed of specific healthcare tasks in a unit. Results: We confirm PCAPS KD contents on the base of 2 guidelines. We can evaluate diagnostic process and severity of KD by route analysis using CPC (figure). We can visualize relationship between treatments and severity by US. US are effective to support the decision on treatment and examinations. From the analysis, there are no lack of the unit and route, and confirm the advice to decision making. Conclusions: PCAPS can easily analyze the severity and clinical process from CPC route analysis because PCAPS is electrical path which can automatically store the data of each hospital. From US data, there are possibilities to find new severity score.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (49) ◽  
pp. 69-89
Author(s):  
sofía De la Puerta ◽  
Carolina Correa

The objective of this work is to understand a clinical process of systemic orientation from the perspective of subjective temporality. The work is based on the theory of subjective time and considers its historical and sociocultural dimension, reviewing its main theoretical constructs that will understand couple relationships and therapeutic processes. A clinical case was analyzed a from the perspective of subjective temporality, based on the main antecedents of the case and using clinical vignettes. Participants were a 36- and 37-year-old heterosexual couple who participated in a couple therapy with two therapists trained in systemic therapy for approximately one year. The sessions were videotaped and analyzed through the theory of subjective temporality. The analysis of the subjective temporality constitutes a contribution to the clinical practice, since it allows to understand and to develop an approach centered in the present moment and that allows analyzing the synchrony and encounter of the members of the system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-360
Author(s):  
Monica Carsky

The clinical and technical difficulties presented by patients with personality disorders are well documented. This article focuses on the challenges faced by therapists when managing their emotional reactions, that is, their countertransferences, to patients with personality disorders. While leaving room for therapists' unique and idiosyncratic countertransferences to the patient with personality pathology, Kernberg emphasized the role of a more general form of countertransference, one reflective largely of the patient's conflicts and defenses, in the treatments of personality disordered individuals. Here, the nature of the patient's internal and external functioning can be seen to lead to similar reactions among different therapists, opening the possibility of utilizing countertransference to better understand the patient's difficulties. In transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP), countertransferences arising in the patient–therapist interaction are first identified and contained by the therapist and then utilized to clarify and explore how the patient's internal object relations are being enacted in the clinical process. This article describes this process and how TFP therapists work with their countertransference to help illuminate the patient's split representational world, paving the way for interpretation and integration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document