scholarly journals Appendix 12: X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Thin-Film Residual Stresses

Glass ◽  
2007 ◽  
pp. 335-339
2006 ◽  
Vol 201 (7) ◽  
pp. 4372-4376 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Girault ◽  
P. Villain ◽  
E. Le Bourhis ◽  
P. Goudeau ◽  
P.-O. Renault

Author(s):  
Marc Seefeldt ◽  
Artur Walentek ◽  
Paul Van Houtte ◽  
Miroslav Vrána ◽  
Petr Lukáš

1997 ◽  
Vol 251 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Linker ◽  
D. Hüttner ◽  
O. Meyer ◽  
M. Ohkubo ◽  
J. Reiner

2016 ◽  
Vol 368 ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
Lukáš Zuzánek ◽  
Ondřej Řidký ◽  
Nikolaj Ganev ◽  
Kamil Kolařík

The basic principle of the X-ray diffraction analysis is based on the determination of components of residual stresses. They are determined on the basis of the change in the distance between atomic planes. The method is limited by a relatively small depth in which the X-ray beam penetrates into the analysed materials. For determination of residual stresses in the surface layer the X-ray diffraction and electrolytic polishing has to be combined. The article is deals with the determination of residual stress and real material structure of a laser-welded steel sample with an oxide surface layer. This surface layer is created during the rolling and it prevents the material from its corrosion. Before the X-ray diffraction analysis can be performed, this surface layer has to be removed. This surface layer cannot be removed with the help of electrolytic polishing and, therefore, it has to be removed mechanically. This mechanical procedure creates “technological” residual stress in the surface layer. This additional residual stress is removed by the electrolytic polishing in the depth between 20 and 80 μm. Finally, the real structure and residual stresses can be determined by using the X-ray diffraction techniques.


2017 ◽  
Vol 395 ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dobročka ◽  
P. Novák ◽  
D. Búc ◽  
L. Harmatha ◽  
J. Murín

2007 ◽  
Vol 567-568 ◽  
pp. 237-240
Author(s):  
Galina Gosmanová ◽  
Ivo Kraus ◽  
Michal Kolega ◽  
Věra Vrtílková

The results of X-ray diffraction analysis of macroscopic stresses σ and crystallite size D in oxide layers are presented in this contribution. The oxide layers were formed on tubular specimens of Zircaloy 4 and Zr1Nb alloys which were simultaneously oxidized for various times under temperature transient conditions (oxidation in water at 360 °C with a short-time shock in steam at 500 °C). A qualitative relation was outlined between the residual stresses in oxide layers and corrosion kinetics of the alloys under investigation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 681 ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Renaud ◽  
Philippe Bristiel ◽  
Laurent Barrallier ◽  
Marc Desvignes ◽  
Regis Kubler

This experimental study focuses on the influence of shot peening on parts initially treated by carburizing or carbonitriding. Experimental investigations have been carried out: optical observations of the microstructures, in-depth hardness measurement, X-ray diffraction analysis of residual stresses. A comparison is made between the carburizing anad the carbonitriding treatments.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Fang ◽  
Jing Huo ◽  
Jinyuan Zhang ◽  
Yi Zheng

The structure of a chemical-vapor-deposited (CVD) diamond thin film on a Mo substrate was studied using quasi-parallel X-ray and glancing incidence techniques. Conventional X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the sample consists of a diamond thin film, a Mo2C transition layer, and Mo substrate. The Mo2C transition layer was formed by a chemical reaction between the diamond film and the Mo substrate during the CVD process. A method for layer-thickness determination of the thin film and the transition layer was developed. This method was based on a relationship between X-ray diffraction intensities from the transition layer or its substrate and a function of grazing incidence angles. Results of glancing incidence X-ray diffraction analysis showed that thicknesses of the diamond thin film and the Mo2C transition layer were determined successfully with high precision.


2002 ◽  
Vol 404-407 ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Geandier ◽  
Patrick Weisbecker ◽  
S. Denis ◽  
Alain Hazotte ◽  
A. Mocellin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document