scholarly journals Evaluation of calibration factor of OSLD toward eye lens exposure dose measurement of medical staff during IVR

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 263-271
Author(s):  
Takashi Asahara ◽  
Hiroaki Hayashi ◽  
Sota Goto ◽  
Natsumi Kimoto ◽  
Kazuki Takegami ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-171
Author(s):  
Toshioh Fujibuchi ◽  
Katsuya Fujita ◽  
Takayuki Igarashi ◽  
Eiji Nishimaru ◽  
Shogo Horita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
C Yamauchi-Kawaura ◽  
K Fujii ◽  
M Yamauchi ◽  
K Imai ◽  
M Ikeda ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of this study was to develop a head–chest phantom that could mimic the physique of a Japanese 0.5-year-old child and to investigate the current status of exposure dose in infant head computed tomography examinations in Japan. The phantom was produced by machine processing, and radiophotoluminescence glass dosemeters were installed in the phantom for dose measurement. Organ doses were measured for seven different head scan protocols routinely used in three hospitals. In this study, the average dose of the brain and lens within the scan region was equivalent to that measured using infant phantoms in previous studies. In contrast, the doses of both salivary glands and thyroid glands adjacent to the scan region were 1.4–1.8 times higher than those in previous studies. Expansion of the scan area accompanied by a transition of the scan mode from non-helical to helical may have resulted in the differences in organ doses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-184
Author(s):  
C Lindholm ◽  
A Pekkarinen ◽  
O Sipilä ◽  
A-L Manninen ◽  
M Lehtinen ◽  
...  

Abstract The eye lens exposure among 16 technicians in two nuclear medicine departments at university hospitals in Finland was investigated by measuring the operational quantity Hp(3) using EYE-D dosemeters. For all workers, the annual mean Hp(3) was estimated to be 1.1 mSv (max. 3.9 mSv). The relation between Hp(3) to routinely monitored personal dose equivalent Hp(10) was clearly correlated. Considering individual dose measurement periods (2–4 weeks), the Hp(3)/Hp(10) ratio was 0.7 (Pearson’s coefficient r = 0.90, p < 0.001, variation of ratio 0.1–2.3). The variation decreased considerably with increasing Hp(10) (σ2 = 0.04 vs. 0.43 for Hp(10) > 0.1 mSv vs. < 0.1 mSv, respectively), i.e. higher Hp(10) predicts Hp(3) more reliably. Moreover, annual Hp(10) data from national dose register during 2009–2018 were used to derive the annual Hp(3) applying the Hp(3)/Hp(10) ratio. The data from Finnish nuclear medicine departments imply that routine measurements of Hp(3) among nuclear medicine technicians are not justified.


2011 ◽  
Vol 144 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Fujii ◽  
S. Ko ◽  
Y. Nako ◽  
A. Tonari ◽  
K. Nishizawa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Anna Zagorska ◽  
Kristina Bliznakova ◽  
Annalisa Trianni ◽  
Jenia Vassileva

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Struelens ◽  
W Schoonjans ◽  
F Schils ◽  
K De Smedt ◽  
F Vanhavere
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4448
Author(s):  
Minoru Osanai ◽  
Hidenori Sato ◽  
Kana Sato ◽  
Kohsei Kudo ◽  
Masahiro Hosoda ◽  
...  

Radiation dose management of medical staff has become increasingly important. Particularly, based on the statement by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in 2011, a new lower equivalent dose limit for the eye lens is being established in each country. Although many reports have discussed the occupational radiation dose in interventional radiology (IR), few studies have examined the dose during computed tomography (CT) examinations. This study investigated the radiation dose exposure to medical staff present in the CT room during irradiation, with particular focus on the exposure to eye lens. The radiation dose exposure to those who assist patients during head, chest and upper abdomen CT examination was measured in a phantom study. The radiation dose exposure with scattered radiation was never negligible (i.e., high); Hp(3) was the highest in head CT examination, at 0.44 mSv per examination. Furthermore, the shielding effect of radiation protection glasses was large, and radiation protection glasses are useful tools for the medical staff who are involved in CT examinations. The justification and optimisation should be carefully considered in assistant actions.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Kosuke Matsubara ◽  
Sayu Yoshida ◽  
Ayaka Hirosawa ◽  
Thunyarat Chusin ◽  
Yasushi Furukawa

This study aimed to evaluate the property of small dosimeters used for measuring eye lens doses for medical staff during fluoroscopic examination. Dose linearity, energy dependence, and directional dependence of scattered X-rays were evaluated for small radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters (RPLDs), those with a tin filter (Sn-RPLDs), and small optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). These dosimeters were pasted on radioprotective glasses, and accumulated air kerma was obtained after irradiating the X-rays to a patient phantom. Strong correlations existed between fluoroscopic time and accumulated air kerma in all types of dosimeters. The energy dependence of Sn-RPLD and OSLD was smaller than that of RPLD. The relative dose value of the OSLD gradually decreased as the angle of the OSLD against the scattered X-rays was larger or lower than the right angle in the horizontal direction. The ranges of relative dose values of RPLD and Sn-RPLD were larger than that of OSLD in the vertical direction. The OSLDs showed lower doses than the RPLDs and Sn-RPLDs, especially on the right side of the radioprotective glasses. These results showed that RPLDs, Sn-RPLDs, and OSLDs had different dosimeter properties, and influence measured eye lens doses for the physician, especially on the opposite side of the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document