scholarly journals Asian cohort for Alzheimer’s disease (ACAD) data collection: Rationale, design and validation

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany W Chow ◽  
Dolly Reyes‐Dumeyer ◽  
Yian Gu ◽  
Clara Li ◽  
Boon Lead Tee ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li‐San Wang ◽  
Boon Lead Tee ◽  
Yian Gu ◽  
Clara Li ◽  
Briana Vogel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sander Lamballais ◽  
Maria C. Adank ◽  
Rowina F. Hussainali ◽  
Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans ◽  
Meike W. Vernooij ◽  
...  

AbstractBrain development and deterioration across the lifespan are integral to the etiology of late-life neurodegenerative disease. Factors that influence the health of the adult brain remain to be elucidated and include risk factors, protective factors, and factors related to cognitive and brain reserve. To address this knowledge gap we designed a life-course study on brain health, which received funding through the EU ERC Programme under the name Origins of Alzheimer’s Disease Across the Life course (ORACLE) Study. The ORACLE Study is embedded within Generation R, a prospective population-based cohort study of children and their parents, and links this with the Rotterdam Study, a population-based study in middle-aged and elderly persons. The studies are based in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Generation R focuses on child health from fetal life until adolescence with repeated in-person examinations, but has also included data collection on the children’s parents. The ORACLE Study aims to extend the parental data collection in nearly 2000 parents with extensive measures on brain health, including neuroimaging, cognitive testing and motor testing. Additionally, questionnaires on migraine, depressive symptoms, sleep, and neurological family history were completed. These data allow for the investigation of longitudinal influences on adult brain health as well as intergenerational designs involving children and parents. As a secondary focus, the sampling is enriched by mothers (n = 356) that suffered from hypertensive disorders during pregnancy in order to study brain health in this high-risk population. This article provides an overview of the rationale and the design of the ORACLE Study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 277-277
Author(s):  
Alex Laffer ◽  
Hilary Hicks ◽  
Genna Losinski ◽  
Amber Watts

Abstract When recruited individuals decline to participate in research, it can lead to sampling bias, increased costs, and extended duration of data collection. Understanding reasons why eligible participants decline participation may improve study enrollment rates. We aimed to understand barriers to recruitment and data collection in older adults with and without Alzheimer’s disease in the University of Kansas Alzheimer’s Disease Center Registry annual visit. We recruited Registry participants to join an observational sub-study using wrist-worn actigraphy to measure physical activity and sleep. We analyzed reasons for non-enrollment from encounters with non-participating individuals. Of 104 encounters, 37 were never recruited due to appointment cancellation, rescheduling, or no-show. Of the remaining encounters, the most common reasons for non-participation were physical limitations (N = 13), study logistics (e.g., limited supplies; N = 12), participant travel plans (N = 10), and unknown (N = 8). Other categories (N = 6) included disinterest, study partner concerns about pragmatics (e.g., fear that an individual with AD would lose the ActiGraph), problems with the study design (e.g., lack of feedback to participants), and participants’ limited availability or deferment to a later date. These findings offer insight into potential avenues to overcome barriers to participation in older adults already engaged in ongoing research through an Alzheimer’s Disease Center Registry. Researchers could benefit from adapting study procedures to correct for reasons of non-participation. For example, giving more education and reassurance to potential participants about observation and giving feedback regarding activity patterns.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Haung Yu ◽  
Marian Tzuang ◽  
Carlos Thomas ◽  
Briana Vogel ◽  
Anna T Lu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document