scholarly journals Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: A case-control study

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 3172-3182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doherty ◽  
Philip Courtney ◽  
Sally Doherty ◽  
Wendy Jenkins ◽  
Rose A. Maciewicz ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110130
Author(s):  
Leigh-Anne Tu ◽  
Douglas S Weinberg ◽  
Raymond W Liu

Background: While the influences of acetabular dysplasia and overcoverage on hip arthritis have been studied, the impact of femoral neck-shaft angle on hip arthritis is much more poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between neck shaft angle and the development of osteoarthritis, a better understanding of which would be useful to surgeons planning osteotomies about the hip. Methods: 533 cadaveric femora and acetabulae (1066 total) from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection (Cleveland, OH) were acquired. We measured true neck shaft angle using an AP photograph with the femoral neck parallel to the table. Femoral head volume to acetabular volume ratio, representing femoral head coverage, as well as femoral version were utilised. Correlation between neck shaft angle, femoral version, femoral head coverage and osteoarthritis were evaluated with multiple regression analysis. Results: The mean age and standard deviation was 56 ± 10 years. There were 64 females (12%) and 469 males. There were 380 Caucasians (71%) and 153 African-Americans. Mean femoral version was 11° ± 12° and mean true neck shaft angle was 127.7° ± 5.9° There was a strong correlation between age and arthritis (standardised beta 0.488, p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between increasing true neck shaft angle and decreasing hip arthritis (standardised beta -0.024, p = 0.038). In the femoral head overcoverage subset, increasing true neck shaft angle was still significantly associated with decreasing hip arthritis (standardised beta −0.088, p = 0.018), although this relationship was not significant with femoral head undercoverage subset. Conclusions: With sufficient acetabular coverage, a relative increase in femoral neck shaft angle within the physiologic range is associated with decreased hip osteoarthritis. Clinical relevance: An understanding of the relationship between femoral neck shaft angle and hip osteoarthritis could be useful for surgeons planning pelvic or proximal femur osteotomies in children.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motonobu Sakaguchi ◽  
Takashi Tanaka ◽  
Wakaba Fukushima ◽  
Toshikazu Kubo ◽  
Yoshio Hirota

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus Klose-Jensen ◽  
Andreas Wiggers Nielsen ◽  
Louise Brøndt Hartlev ◽  
Jesper Skovhus Thomasen ◽  
Lene Warner Thorup Boel ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The objective of this cross-sectional case-control study was to determine the prevalence and size of marginal and subarticular osteophytes in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare these to that of a control group. Design We investigated femoral heads from 25 patients with OA following hip replacement surgery, and 25 femoral heads from a control group obtained post-mortem . The area and boundary length of the femoral head, marginal osteophytes, and subarticular osteophytes were determined with histomorphometry. Marginal osteophytes were defined histologically as bony projections at the peripheral margin of the femoral head, while subarticular osteophytes were defined as areas of bone that expanded from the normal curvature of the femoral head into the articular cartilage. Results The prevalence of OA patients with marginal- and subarticular osteophytes were 100% and 84%, respectively. Whereas the prevalence of the participants in the control group with marginal- and subarticular osteophytes were 56% and 28%, respectively. The area and boundary length of marginal osteophytes was (median (Interquartile range)) 165.3mm 2 (121.4 – 254.0) mm 2 and 75.1 mm (50.8 – 99.3) mm for patients with OA compared to 0 mm 2 (0 – 0.5) mm 2 and 0 mm (0 – 0.5) mm for the control group (P < 0.001). For the subarticular osteophytes, the area and boundary length was 1.0 mm 2 (0 – 4.4) mm 2 and 1.4 mm (0 – 6.5) mm for patients with OA compared to 0 mm 2 (0 – 0.5) mm 2 and 0 mm (0 – 0.5) mm for the control group (P < 0.001). Conclusion As expected, both marginal- and subarticular osteophytes at the femoral head, were more frequent and larger in patients with OA than in the control group. However, in the control group, subarticular osteophytes were more prevalent than expected from the minor osteophytic changes at the femoral head margin, which may suggest that subarticular osteophytes are an early degenerative phenomenon that ultimately might develop into clinical osteoarthritis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 2348-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin‐Yuan Wang ◽  
Bing‐Xuan Hua ◽  
Chang Jiang ◽  
Heng‐Feng Yuan ◽  
Liang Zhu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Slomka ◽  
Witold Rongies ◽  
Janusz Sierdzinski ◽  
Wlodzimierz Dolecki ◽  
Marta Worwag ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document