scholarly journals Animating predator and prey fish interactions

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. e1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahithi Podila ◽  
Ying Zhu
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e102002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Ranåker ◽  
Jens Persson ◽  
Mikael Jönsson ◽  
P. Anders Nilsson ◽  
Christer Brönmark


2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 1761-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
LYNN RANÅKER ◽  
MIKAEL JÖNSSON ◽  
P. ANDERS NILSSON ◽  
CHRISTER BRÖNMARK




2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Scharnweber ◽  
Kozo Watanabe ◽  
Jari Syväranta ◽  
Thomas Wanke ◽  
Michael T Monaghan ◽  
...  


1993 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. S. Johannes

Aggregations of prey fish, golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas), were examined during 7 yr of predator manipulations in two lakes to determine whether they responded to changes in predation pressure and varied with time-of-day, age, and habitat. Regression analysis was used to examine aggregation in 12 replicate prey densities from two time periods, two ages, two habitats, three sample series, and seven predator densities. Aggregation was assessed as the variance of mean densities for each treatment combination. Multiple regression and ANCOVA analyses indicated that (1) golden shiner aggregated more during day than night, (2) their aggregation was positively related to predator density, (3) young shiner aggregated more than older ones at low predator densities, and (4) aggregation in older shiner was more responsive to increased predator densities than aggregation in younger shiner. These results provide empirical evidence that golden shiner aggregation patterns respond to predation pressure and the response varies with time and age. These results also suggest that variance in net catches can provide an index of fish aggregation and that aggregation observed at the population level is not solely dependent on species and density, but is a behavioural response mediated by several factors including predators.



Ecology ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1457-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Safina ◽  
Joanna Burger


Author(s):  
Joshua T. Ackerman ◽  
C. Alex Hartman ◽  
Collin A. Eagles-Smith ◽  
Mark P. Herzog ◽  
Jay Davison ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1512-1516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie V. Klinard ◽  
Jordan K. Matley ◽  
Aaron T. Fisk ◽  
Timothy B. Johnson


PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong-Hua Tang ◽  
Qing Huang ◽  
Hui Wu ◽  
Lu Kuang ◽  
Shi-Jian Fu

Predation is one of the key factors governing patterns in natural systems, and adjustments of prey behaviors in response to a predator stimulus can have important ecological implications for wild fish. To investigate the effects of predators on the behavior of prey fish and to test whether the possible effects varied with predator size, black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus) and snakehead (Channa argus) (a size-matched predator treatment with a similar body size to prey fish and a larger predator treatment with approximately 2.7 times of the body mass of prey fish) were selected to function as prey and predator, respectively. Their spontaneous activities were videorecorded in a central circular arena surrounded by a ring holding the stimulus fish. The distance between prey and predator fish was approximately 200% of the distance between two prey fish, which suggested that black carp can distinguish their conspecifics from heterospecifics and probably recognize the snakehead as a potential predator. The prey fish spent substantially less time moving and exhibited an overall shorter total distance of movement after the size-matched or large predator was introduced, which possibly occurred due to increased vigilance or efforts to reduce the possibility of detection by potential predators. However, there was no significant difference in either distance or spontaneous activities between two predator treatments. These findings suggested that (1) an anti-predator strategy in black carp might involve maintaining a safe distance, decreasing activity and possibly increased vigilance and that (2) the behaviors of prey response to predators were not influenced by their relative size difference.



Hydrobiologia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 746 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno R. S. Figueiredo ◽  
Roger P. Mormul ◽  
Sidinei M. Thomaz
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document