scholarly journals PROTOCOL: Mindfulness‐Based Interventions for Improving Academic Achievement, Behavior and Socio‐Emotional Functioning of Primary and Secondary Students: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandy R. Maynard ◽  
Michael R. Solis ◽  
Veronica L. Miller
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roya Sherafat ◽  
C. G. Venkatesha Murthy

The authors of this study have attempted to understand whether study habits affect academic achievement among secondary and senior secondary school students of Mysore. It is also attempted to know whether students at secondary level differ from senior secondary level on their study habits. The study was conducted on the sample of 625 students of Mysore City in India using stratified random sampling technique. Results indicated that the study habits facilitate higher academic achievement. Further, it was also found that secondary school students are significantly better than senior secondary students on study habits. The findings are analyzed and explained. Thus, study habit is found to be an important correlate of academic achievement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dena Sadeghi Bahmani ◽  
Parviz Faraji ◽  
Robab Faraji ◽  
Undine E. Lang ◽  
Edith Holsboer-Trachsler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (16) ◽  
pp. 1039-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adilson Marques ◽  
Diana A Santos ◽  
Charles H Hillman ◽  
Luís B Sardinha

ObjectiveThis report aimed to systematically review the evidence for a differential association between objective and self-reported physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness on academic achievement.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesStudies were identified from searches in Embase, Education Resources Information Center, PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTdiscus and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to December 2016.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesEligibility criteria included cross-sectional, longitudinal and interventional study designs. Outcomes included students’ school grade or a standardised test or measure of academic achievement. Explanatory variables were cardiorespiratory fitness and objective and self-reported physical activity. Inclusion criteria included school-aged children and adolescents aged–18 years (or students from primary to secondary school when student’s participants age was not described) and articles published in English, Portuguese or Spanish.ResultsA total of 51 articles met inclusion criteria: 41 cross-sectional, 2 intervention and 8 longitudinal studies. Results from 11 studies were inconsistent regarding the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and academic achievement. Ten of the 16 articles reported positive associations between self-reported physical activity and academic achievement. From the 22 studies that analysed the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and academic achievement, it was verified that they all generally support the beneficial effect of cardiorespiratory fitness on students’ academic achievement.ConclusionHigher cardiorespiratory fitness may be important to enhance children and adolescents’ health and, additionally, academic achievement. Due to a lack of consensus across studies, methodological issues associated with the assessment of physical activity should be considered when investigating physical activity and academic achievement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 590-607
Author(s):  
Victoria A. Sanderson ◽  
Amanda Digel Vandyk ◽  
Ian D. Graham ◽  
Sophie Lightfoot ◽  
Mackenzie Murawsky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rosemary Flanagan ◽  
Jeff A. Miller

Chapter 3 outlines the typical approach to psychoeducational assessment used by school psychologists and discusses the implications of this approach to case conceptualization. It then covers current measures commonly used in psychoeducational assessment across the domains of cognitive, academic achievement, and social-emotional functioning, including projective or performance-based measures, as well as tests and test batteries, behavioral observation, interviews, performance-based measures, adaptive functioning, and neuropsychological assessment. It concludes with a discussion of current controversies about the strengths and weaknesses of psychoeducational assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Burrows ◽  
S. Goldman ◽  
K. Pursey ◽  
R. Lim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document