scholarly journals Quality of life in survivors of multiple primary cancers compared with cancer survivor controls

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (9) ◽  
pp. 2101-2109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn C. Gotay ◽  
Sean Ransom ◽  
Ian S. Pagano
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
Victoria Raveis ◽  
Simona Kwon

Abstract Women have a 1-in-8 lifetime risk of breast cancer. Earlier diagnosis and treatment advances have improved 15- and 20-year survival rates. Increased survival can mean coping with the effects of cancer and its treatment over an extended period of time, while experiencing age-related changes in functioning and the emergence of other health issues. To explore breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on their issues and concerns across the life-course, focus groups were conducted with a culturally diverse sample (N=18) of survivors (72% white, 28% Black, 11% Hispanic). Participants were 44-82 years old. Most, 83% were 50 and older, 56% were 60 and older. The majority (83%) were diagnosed in their 40’s and 50’s. Two were diagnosed in their early 30’s and one at age 68. Participants reaffirmed the necessity, as a breast cancer survivor, of being a life-long health advocate on their own behalf, and the importance of being self-informed. As one woman commented: “Knowledge is power”. Survivors shared that their emergent health issues were complicated by their cancer history, and, that, as a cancer survivor, “I never stop worrying”. A widespread concern was not knowing if the health issues and co-morbidities they experienced (such as joint pain, neuropathy, tendinitis, heart disease), were age-related, a consequence of their cancer, or a late treatment effect. An overriding sentiment expressed was that clinicians have not recognized the importance of quality of life in cancer survival. As a survivor succinctly stated: “We are living longer, but we need to live long with quality of life.”


Author(s):  
Maria Mitus-Kenig ◽  
Marcin Derwich ◽  
Ewa Czochrowska ◽  
Elzbieta Pawlowska

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors with a control group of healthy subjects before, during, and after the orthodontic treatment. Methods: Consecutive cancer survivors (40 people) who were looking for orthodontic treatment between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled into the study. Healthy orthodontic patients matched for age (±4 years), sex, and malocclusion served as controls. The 14-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile was used to assess the effect of orthodontic treatment on QoL before, during, and after the orthodontic treatment. Results: There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the cast model, cephalometric analysis, and photographic documentation analysis. There was a significant worsening of QoL after the onset of the orthodontic treatment with a significant improvement after the treatment. Male cancer survivor patients reported significantly lower QoL during the treatment time, which was not observed in the male control group. Conclusions: The outcome of orthodontic treatment in cancer survivors did not differ from the healthy orthodontic patients. The orthodontic treatment had an impact on the oral health quality of life both in the cancer and the control groups with a significantly higher impact in male cancer survivor patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1607-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Femke W. van Dis ◽  
Floortje Mols ◽  
Ad J.J.M. Vingerhoets ◽  
Betty Ferrell ◽  
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 238-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad J. Zebrack

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Robyn Andersen ◽  
Deborah J. Bowen ◽  
Jessica Morea ◽  
Kevin D. Stein ◽  
Frank Baker

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Ruiyin Ge ◽  
Aixia Gong ◽  
Kang Sun ◽  
Jingwen Zhang ◽  
Jing Ma

Multiple colorectal cancers are extremely rare, few cases can be searched in the literature. Our group only found 6 cases published. We report a case where 3 diseases coexisted summarize the currently available literature. A 75-year-old man presented with changes in his bowel habits and hematochezia. After a colonoscopy with biopsies in a community hospital, he was diagnosed with a descending adenocarcinoma patient. To get further treatment, he came to our hospital. Colonoscopy revealed ulcerative lesions in the descending colon, 2 polypoid lesions in the sigmoid colon, and a protruded lesions in the anorectal. The ulcerative lesions were already diagnosed as adenocarcinoma at the descending colon. So biopsies were taken in the anorectal region, which revealed poorly differentiated melanoma of the anorectal. Computed tomography did not find distant metastases and regional lymphadenopathy. A laparoscopic resection was undertaken to relieve his symptoms and improve the quality of life. The mass showed descending adenocarcinoma, sigmoid multiple early cancers, and poorly differentiated melanoma of the anorectal region. What we can learn is that endoscopy doctors should always be aware of the possibilities of multiple primary cancers for this is important to the treatment and prognosis of patients, standard colonoscopy examination is necessary and returning a enteroscope from cecum should be more than 8 minutes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Robyn Andersen ◽  
Erin Sweet ◽  
Kimberly A. Lowe ◽  
Leanna J. Standish ◽  
Charles W. Drescher ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 506 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Van Ba ◽  
Ho Viet Hoanh ◽  
Tran Van Ha ◽  
Dang Quang Vinh

Multiple primary neoplasms are relatively rare, but their incidence has increased because of aging and improvements in diagnostic imaging. There are many ways to classify, but nowadays, multiple primary cancers are again classified as synchronous and metachronous, the time is 6 months after the first primary injury detection, some authors get 12 months.  Our clinical case is a 66-year-old man, prolonged exposure to risk factors for cancer. The patient was diagnosed with different types of primary cancer, colon cancer, thyroid cancer, lung cancer, and stomach cancer. The patient was treated according to the general clinical guidelines suitable for the disease type and the stage of the disease at the time of detection. Lesson learned is the importance of screening tests, attitudes, and comprehensive views of doctors for cancer patients, avoiding missing injuries, affecting the quality of treatment for patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document