A comparison of physical characteristics, functions and quality of life between breast cancer survivor women who had a mastectomy and healthy women

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 937-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdiye Zabit ◽  
Gozde Iyigun
2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Robyn Andersen ◽  
Deborah J. Bowen ◽  
Jessica Morea ◽  
Kevin D. Stein ◽  
Frank Baker

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A748
Author(s):  
L Balderas-Peña ◽  
D Sat-Muñoz ◽  
S Contreras-Contreras ◽  
A Novoa-Martínez ◽  
J Saucedo-Ortiz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
Victoria Raveis ◽  
Simona Kwon

Abstract Women have a 1-in-8 lifetime risk of breast cancer. Earlier diagnosis and treatment advances have improved 15- and 20-year survival rates. Increased survival can mean coping with the effects of cancer and its treatment over an extended period of time, while experiencing age-related changes in functioning and the emergence of other health issues. To explore breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on their issues and concerns across the life-course, focus groups were conducted with a culturally diverse sample (N=18) of survivors (72% white, 28% Black, 11% Hispanic). Participants were 44-82 years old. Most, 83% were 50 and older, 56% were 60 and older. The majority (83%) were diagnosed in their 40’s and 50’s. Two were diagnosed in their early 30’s and one at age 68. Participants reaffirmed the necessity, as a breast cancer survivor, of being a life-long health advocate on their own behalf, and the importance of being self-informed. As one woman commented: “Knowledge is power”. Survivors shared that their emergent health issues were complicated by their cancer history, and, that, as a cancer survivor, “I never stop worrying”. A widespread concern was not knowing if the health issues and co-morbidities they experienced (such as joint pain, neuropathy, tendinitis, heart disease), were age-related, a consequence of their cancer, or a late treatment effect. An overriding sentiment expressed was that clinicians have not recognized the importance of quality of life in cancer survival. As a survivor succinctly stated: “We are living longer, but we need to live long with quality of life.”


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiran Klein ◽  
Michal Braun

Abstract Purpose: Young breast cancer survivors often go through a rapid change in menopause status due to cancer treatment and suffer from abrupt symptoms. This transition compels them to deal with unique medical and psychological side effects on their quality of life. One of the most affected quality of life domains is sexual functioning.This study explored the differences in frequency of sexual activity between young breast cancer survivors and young healthy women. It also examined whether this difference in sexual activity frequency was mediated by discomfort and/or pleasure during intercourse, both of which are affected by early menopausal symptoms.Methods: 97 young breast cancer survivors and 75 young healthy women completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, The Fallowfield's Sexual Activity Questionnaire (FSAQ), and the Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS). Additionally, the breast cancer participants completed a medical data questionnaire.Results: Findings revealed a significant direct effect between group and menopausal symptoms, menopausal symptoms and pleasure, and pleasure and habit. Structural equation modeling explained the differences between the groups in sexual frequency (habit) as mediated by menopausal symptoms and both pleasure and discomfort. Conclusions and Implications: These results highlight the impact of pleasure on the frequency of young breast cancer survivors' sexual activity, and its relation to menopausal symptoms. These young women should be provided with appropriate information and interventions that will help them experience increased pleasure during sexual activity despite their early and induced menopausal symptoms.


Author(s):  
Jenna Smith-Turchyn ◽  
Michelle E. McCowan ◽  
Erin O’Loughlin ◽  
Angela J. Fong ◽  
Meghan H. McDonough ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peer-based exercise interventions that cultivate new opportunities for support with a fellow cancer survivor may result in increased exercise volume. It is not clear whether adding qualified exercise professional (QEP) support to peer-based interventions improves health outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine whether breast cancer survivor (BCS) dyads who receive 10 weekly sessions of virtually delivered QEP support have improved outcomes compared to BCS dyads who do not receive QEP support. Methods Participants Adult BCS with medical clearance for exercise, who have an internet-connected device, and currently engage in < 150 min of moderate-intensity exercise per week. Intervention BCS will be matched using evidence-based criteria. The intervention group will receive dyadic exercise information sessions and a program tailored by a QEP for 10 weeks (intervention period) and have access to the QEP for an additional 4 weeks (tapering period). The control will not receive any QEP support. Outcomes The primary outcome is post-intervention self-reported exercise volume. Secondary outcomes include device-assessed exercise volume (i.e., Fitbit), social support, and health-related quality of life. Randomization 108 participants, matched in dyads, will be randomized 1:1 to the MatchQEP or Match groups using a web-based scheme. Statistical analysis Outcomes will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, post-tapering, and at 12 weeks post-intervention follow-up. Discussion The findings from this RCT will determine if matched BCS dyads who receive 10 weeks of virtually delivered QEP support have higher levels of self-report and device-measured exercise, social support, and health related quality of life compared to matched dyads without QEP-delivered exercise guidance. To our knowledge this will be the first study to assess the combined effect of peer- and QEP support on exercise volume. Project findings will inform and optimize intervention methods aimed to increase exercise among BCS through accessible exercise supports. Trial Registration: The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier: NCT04771975, protocol Version Number: 2, date: July 22, 2021).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document