Investigating the effects of compound paralogous EPHB receptor mutations on mouse facial development

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Mincer ◽  
Terren K. Niethamer ◽  
Teng Teng ◽  
Jeffrey O. Bush ◽  
Christopher J. Percival
1997 ◽  
Vol 191 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet E. Braisted ◽  
Todd McLaughlin ◽  
Hai U. Wang ◽  
Glenn C. Friedman ◽  
David J. Anderson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
Shahista Parveen ◽  
Rohan Mascarenhas ◽  
Akhter Husain ◽  
Devadas Acharya

Background Understanding facial development requires sound knowledge of growth at different stages. Although studies in the past have established the relationship between prenatal and postnatal growth, little research has been done using noninvasive ultrasound. The purpose of this study is to evaluate correlation between prenatal and postnatal growths using ultrasound as a fetal growth assessment tool. Study Settings: It is a hospital-based study where prenatal growth is measured at different intervals of gestational period and compared with the growth at birth. Materials and Methods: Ten subjects with normal pregnancy were studied using ultrasound. Cephalocaudal growth gradient, body proportions of the fetus were assessed and compared at different stages. Growth was also evaluated at birth and compared with the predicted growth. Results The growth rate of estimated fetal weight is at maximum between the 28th and 32nd week of the fetal life (P ≤ 0.001). The growth rate of head circumference, occipitofrontal diameter, and femur length is maximum between the 20th and 28th week of the fetal life (P < 0.001). Cephalocaudal growth gradient decreases with increased age of the fetus. Conclusions Prenatal growth is correlated with postnatal growth. Ultrasound can be used as a tool for the measurement and prediction of prenatal and postnatal growths.


PROTEOMICS ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 2542-2550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Mangum ◽  
Peter G. Farlie ◽  
Michael J. Hubbard

Author(s):  
Carolyn R. Hodges-Simeon ◽  
Graham Albert ◽  
George B. Richardson ◽  
Timothy S. McHale ◽  
Seth M. Weinberg ◽  
...  

AbstractSexual selection researchers have traditionally focused on adult sex differences; however, the schedule and pattern of sex-specific ontogeny can provide insights unobtainable from an exclusive focus on adults. Recently, it has been debated whether facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR; bi-zygomatic breadth divided by midface height) is a human secondary sexual characteristic (SSC). Here, we review current evidence, then address this debate using ontogenetic evidence, which has been under-explored in fWHR research. Facial measurements collected from males and females aged 3 to 40 (Study 1; US, n=2449), and 7 to 21 (Study 2; Bolivia, n=179) were used to calculate three fWHR variants (which we call fWHRnasion, fWHRstomion, and fWHRbrow) and two other common facial masculinity ratios (facial width-to-lower-face-height ratio, fWHRlower, and cheekbone prominence). We test whether the observed pattern of facial development exhibits patterns indicative of SSCs, i.e. differential adolescent growth in either male or female facial morphology leading to an adult sex difference. Results showed that only fWHRlower exhibited both adult sex differences as well as the classic pattern of ontogeny for SSCs—greater lower-face growth in male adolescents relative to females. fWHRbrow was significantly wider among both pre- and post-pubertal males in the 2D sample; post-hoc analyses revealed that the effect was driven by large sex differences in brow height, with females having higher placed brows than males across ages. In both samples, all fWHR measures were inversely associated with age; that is, human facial growth is characterized by greater relative growth in the mid-face and lower face relative to facial width. This trend continues even into middle adulthood. BMI was also a positive predictor of most of the ratios across ages, with greater BMI associated with wider faces. Researchers collecting data on fWHR should target fWHRlower and fWHRbrow and should control for both age and BMI.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0233377
Author(s):  
David C. Katz ◽  
J. David Aponte ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Rebecca M. Green ◽  
Jessica M. Mayeux ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1326-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Oike ◽  
Yasuhiro Ito ◽  
Koichi Hamada ◽  
Xiu-Qin Zhang ◽  
Keishi Miyata ◽  
...  

Although the cellular and molecular mechanisms governing angiogenesis are only beginning to be understood, signaling through endothelial-restricted receptors, particularly receptor tyrosine kinases, has been shown to play a pivotal role in these events. Recent reports show that EphB receptor tyrosine kinases and their transmembrane-type ephrin-B2 ligands play essential roles in the embryonic vasculature. These studies suggest that cell-to-cell repellent effects due to bidirectional EphB/ephrin-B2 signaling may be crucial for vascular development, similar to the mechanism described for neuronal development. To test this hypothesis, we disrupted the precise expression pattern of EphB/ephrin-B2 in vivo by generating transgenic (CAGp-ephrin-B2 Tg) mice that express ephrin-B2 under the control of a ubiquitous and constitutive promoter, CMV enhancer-β-actin promoter-β-globin splicing acceptor (CAG). These mice displayed an abnormal segmental arrangement of intersomitic vessels, while such anomalies were not observed in Tie-2p-ephrin-B2 Tg mice in which ephrin-B2 was overexpressed in only vascular endothelial cells (ECs). This finding suggests that non-ECs expressing ephrin-B2 alter the migration of ECs expressing EphB receptors into the intersomitic region where ephrin-B2 expression is normally absent. CAGp-ephrin-B2 Tg mice show sudden death at neonatal stages from aortic dissecting aneurysms due to defective recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells to the ascending aorta. EphB/ephrin-B2 signaling between endothelial cells and surrounding mesenchymal cells plays an essential role in vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vessel maturation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen‐Tao Liu ◽  
Hao‐Chuan Li ◽  
Xue‐Song Song ◽  
Zhi‐Jiang Huang ◽  
Xue‐Jun Song

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document