Age, sex and clinical outcomes with digoxin vs beta‐blocker in permanent atrial fibrillation with heart failure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Fauchier ◽  
Arnaud Bisson ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

P3793Spironolactone in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, possible heart failure protective potential

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Dabrowski ◽  
T Chwyczko ◽  
I Kowalik ◽  
E Smolis-Bak ◽  
A Borowiec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Minute Walk

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) promotes electrical, neurohormonal and structural remodeling of atria and ventricles. Long lasting AF leads to atrial interstitial fibrosis, apoptosis, loss of myofibrils and finally to heart failure (HF). Purpose The aim of the study was impact of aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone, on exercise tolerance and neurohormonal activity in patients with permanent AF without symptoms of HF. Methods In prospective, randomized study patients with permanent AF at least for 1 year, no signs and symptoms of HF and stable clinical condition were included. Patients were randomized to: beta-blocker plus spironolactone (dose: 25 mg) treatment and rate-control treatment with only beta-blocker. Propranolol, metoprolol and bisoprolol were used, doses were adjusted to achieve resting heart rate 60–80/min. Ergospirometry (CPX) and 6-minute walk (6-MWT) tests were performed during separate days. Results Study group consisted of 49 patients, 69% men, mean age 62.1±9.6 without structural and chronic active diseases, mean time of arrhythmia was 5.5 years, Q1: 2, Q3: 8 years. Follow-up was 11.2 months. All patients were treated with beta-blockers, 27 patients were treated with 25 mg spironolactone. Surprisingly physical capacity in 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) in studied patients was not significantly reduced in comparison with values ranges for healthy volunteers. After 11.2 months follow-up significantly longer exercise time (433±113 vs. 367±162 sec, p<0.05) and lower maximal HR (159±25 vs. 165±22 beats/min, p<0.0550) were observed in spironolactone treated group. Other CPX variables did not differ significantly between groups after 11,2 months: VO2: 20.7±5.1 vs. 20.1±4.8 [ml/kg/min]; VO2 as % of normal value: 78.4±15.2 vs. 76.8±15.2; O2 pulse: 12±2.8 vs. 12.7±3.6 [ml/beat]; AT: 1.4±0.3, 1.6±0.5 [L/min]; VE: 74.9±20.0, 72.6±17.9 [L/min]. All spirometric variables worsened after 11.2 months: VC: 4.3±1.1 vs. 3.8±0.8 [L], p<0.0005, FVC: 4.2±1.1 vs. 3.8±1.0 p<0.005 [L], FEV1: 3.1±0.8 vs. 2.8±0.7 [L], p<0.01. In spironolactone treated group after 11.2 months BNP concentrations were significantly lower: Q1: 54, Q2: 83, Q3: 100 vs. Q1: 42, Q2: 93; Q3: 184 ng/L (p=0.025) and aldosterone levels were markedly increased: Q1: 216, Q2: 266; Q3:443 vs. Q1: 169; Q2: 228; Q3:294 ng/dL (p=0.0007). Conclusions In patients with permanent atrial fibrillation cardiopulmonary exercise responses were markedly abnormal, but exercise capacity was increased after spironolactone treatment. Deterioration of spirometry results might be due to beta-blocker treatment. In spironolactone treated group BNP levels were significantly lower what may correspond to its heart failure protective activity.

Heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Prognosis with beta blocker and digoxin alone or in combination

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 161-162
Author(s):  
L FAUCHIER ◽  
B RAUZY ◽  
E NONIN ◽  
L GORIN ◽  
O MARIE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Beta Blocker

Fluid retention in patients with paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation and heart failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 2402
Author(s):  
V. V. Kirillova ◽  
L. A. Sokolova ◽  
A. A. Garganeyeva ◽  
V. N. Meshchaninov ◽  
R. E. Batalov
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Fluid Retention ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Discharge heart rate and clinical outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients with coexisted atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Xing ◽  
X Bai ◽  
J Li
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard

Abstract Background Whether discharge heart rate for hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients with coexisted atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with long-term clinical outcomes and whether this association differs between patients with and without beta-blockers have not been well studied. Purpose We investigated the associations between discharge heart rate and clinical outcomes in hospitalized HF patients with coexisted AF, while stratified to beta-blockers at discharge. Methods The study cohort included 1631 HF patients hospitalized primarily with AF, which was from the China PEACE Prospective Heart Failure Study. Clinical outcome was 1-year combined all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization after discharge. We analyzed association between outcome and heart rate at discharge with restricted cubic spline and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). Results The median age was 68 (IQR: 60- 77) years, 41.9% were women, discharge heart rate was (median (IQR)) 75 (69- 84) beats per minute (bpm), and 60.2% received beta-blockers at discharge. According to the result of restricted cubic spline plot, the relationship between discharge heart rate and clinical outcome may be nonlinear (P&lt;0.01). Based on above result, these patients were divided into 3 groups: lowest &lt;65 bpm, middle 65–86 bpm and highest ≥87 bpm, clinical outcomes occurred in 128 (64.32%), 624 (53.42%) and 156 (59.32%) patients in the lowest, middle, and highest groups respectively. In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, the lowest and highest groups were associated with increased risks of clinical outcome compared with the middle group (HR: 1.289, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.056 - 1.573, p=0.013; HR: 1.276, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.537, p=0.01, respectively). And a significant interaction between discharge heart rate and beta-blocker use was observed (P&lt;0.001 for interaction). Stratified analysis showed the lowest group was associated with increased risks of clinical outcomes in patients with beta-blockers (HR: 1.584, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.215–2.066, p=0.001). Conclusion There may be a U-curve relationship between discharge heart rate and clinical outcomes in hospitalized HF patients with coexisted AF. They may have the best clinical outcomes with heart rates of 65 - 86 bpm. And strict heart rate control (&lt;65 bpm) may be avoided for patients who discharge with beta-blockers. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC1310803) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China; the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (2017-I2M-B&R-02); the 111 Project from the Ministry of Education of China (B16005).

scholarly journals Plasma natriuretic peptide level is an independent determinant of major clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients without heart failure: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hamatani ◽  
M Iguchi ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of death, stroke/systemic embolism and heart failure (HF). Plasma natriuretic peptide (NP) level is an important prognostic marker in HF patients. However, little is known regarding the prognostic significance of plasma NP level in AF patients without HF. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between plasma NP level and clinical outcomes such as all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization during follow-up period in AF patients without HF. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in our city. The inclusion criterion of the registry is the documentation of AF at 12-lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring at any time, and there are no exclusion criteria. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. From the registry, we excluded 1,220 patients without a pre-existing HF (defined as having one of the following; prior hospitalization for HF, New York Heart Association class ≥2, or left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40%). Among 3,246 AF patients without HF, we investigated 1,189 patients with the data of plasma BNP (n=401) or N-terminal pro-BNP (n=788) level at the enrollment. We divided the patients according to the quartile of each plasma BNP or NT-pro BNP level and compared the backgrounds and outcomes between these 4 groups stratified by plasma NP level. Results Of 1,189 patients, the mean age was 72.1±10.2 years, 454 (38%) were female and 684 (58%) were paroxysmal AF. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score were 1.6±1.1 and 2.9±1.5, respectively. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed in 671 (56%) at baseline. The median (interquartile range) BNP and N-terminal pro-BNP level were 84 (38, 176) and 500 (155, 984) pg/ml, respectively. Patients with high plasma NP level were older, and demonstrated lower prevalence of paroxysmal AF, higher CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulants prescription (all P&lt;0.01). A total of 165 all-cause death, 114 stroke/systemic embolism and 103 HF hospitalization occurred during the median follow-up period of 5.0 years. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that higher plasma NP level was significantly associated with the incidences of all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF (Figure 1A). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that plasma NP level could stratify the risk of clinical outcomes even after adjustment by type of AF, CHA2DS2-VASc score, chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulant prescription (Figure 1B). Conclusion Plasma NP level is a significant prognostic marker for all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF, suggesting the importance of measuring plasma NP level in AF patients even without HF. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Clinical Outcomes of Rivaroxaban Monotherapy in Heart Failure Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Disease: Insights From the AFIRE Trial

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (17) ◽  
pp. 1449-1451
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Yazaki ◽  
Masato Nakamura ◽  
Raisuke Iijima ◽  
Satoshi Yasuda ◽  
Koichi Kaikita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Disease ◽  
Heart Failure Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document