P3793Spironolactone in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, possible heart failure protective potential

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Dabrowski ◽  
T Chwyczko ◽  
I Kowalik ◽  
E Smolis-Bak ◽  
A Borowiec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Minute Walk

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) promotes electrical, neurohormonal and structural remodeling of atria and ventricles. Long lasting AF leads to atrial interstitial fibrosis, apoptosis, loss of myofibrils and finally to heart failure (HF). Purpose The aim of the study was impact of aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone, on exercise tolerance and neurohormonal activity in patients with permanent AF without symptoms of HF. Methods In prospective, randomized study patients with permanent AF at least for 1 year, no signs and symptoms of HF and stable clinical condition were included. Patients were randomized to: beta-blocker plus spironolactone (dose: 25 mg) treatment and rate-control treatment with only beta-blocker. Propranolol, metoprolol and bisoprolol were used, doses were adjusted to achieve resting heart rate 60–80/min. Ergospirometry (CPX) and 6-minute walk (6-MWT) tests were performed during separate days. Results Study group consisted of 49 patients, 69% men, mean age 62.1±9.6 without structural and chronic active diseases, mean time of arrhythmia was 5.5 years, Q1: 2, Q3: 8 years. Follow-up was 11.2 months. All patients were treated with beta-blockers, 27 patients were treated with 25 mg spironolactone. Surprisingly physical capacity in 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) in studied patients was not significantly reduced in comparison with values ranges for healthy volunteers. After 11.2 months follow-up significantly longer exercise time (433±113 vs. 367±162 sec, p<0.05) and lower maximal HR (159±25 vs. 165±22 beats/min, p<0.0550) were observed in spironolactone treated group. Other CPX variables did not differ significantly between groups after 11,2 months: VO2: 20.7±5.1 vs. 20.1±4.8 [ml/kg/min]; VO2 as % of normal value: 78.4±15.2 vs. 76.8±15.2; O2 pulse: 12±2.8 vs. 12.7±3.6 [ml/beat]; AT: 1.4±0.3, 1.6±0.5 [L/min]; VE: 74.9±20.0, 72.6±17.9 [L/min]. All spirometric variables worsened after 11.2 months: VC: 4.3±1.1 vs. 3.8±0.8 [L], p<0.0005, FVC: 4.2±1.1 vs. 3.8±1.0 p<0.005 [L], FEV1: 3.1±0.8 vs. 2.8±0.7 [L], p<0.01. In spironolactone treated group after 11.2 months BNP concentrations were significantly lower: Q1: 54, Q2: 83, Q3: 100 vs. Q1: 42, Q2: 93; Q3: 184 ng/L (p=0.025) and aldosterone levels were markedly increased: Q1: 216, Q2: 266; Q3:443 vs. Q1: 169; Q2: 228; Q3:294 ng/dL (p=0.0007). Conclusions In patients with permanent atrial fibrillation cardiopulmonary exercise responses were markedly abnormal, but exercise capacity was increased after spironolactone treatment. Deterioration of spirometry results might be due to beta-blocker treatment. In spironolactone treated group BNP levels were significantly lower what may correspond to its heart failure protective activity.

scholarly journals Are the results of the RATE-AF trial reproducible in daily practice? Clinical outcomes with digoxin vs beta-blocker for heart rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Fauchier ◽  
A Bisson ◽  
A Bodin ◽  
P.H Spiesser ◽  
N Clementy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Heart Rate Control ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Yearly Rate

Abstract Background There is little evidence to support selection of heart rate control therapy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), in particular those with coexisting heart failure. In the recent RATE-AF trial that included patients with permanent AF and symptoms of heart failure, treatment with low-dose digoxin or bisoprolol did not result in statistically significant difference in quality of life at 6 months. The purpose of the study was to analyse whether the clinical outcomes may differ among unselected patients with permanent AF treated with digoxin or beta-blocker seen in daily practice. Methods All patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) seen in an academic institution were identified in a database. We examined the clinical course of 8962 consecutive patients with AF seen over a 10-year period. The adverse outcomes were investigated during follow-up and we identified the causes of death. Among them 1,787 patients had the RATE-AF criteria of inclusion (permanent AF, age ≥60 and NYHA ≥2), of whom 512 patients (29%) were treated with beta-blocker alone, 425 (24%) were treated with digoxin alone and 237 (13%) were treated with both a beta-blocker and digoxin. Outcomes in patients treated with beta-blocker alone or digoxin alone were compared after 1:1 propensity-score matching. Results After propensity score matching, 270 patients treated with beta-blocker were matched 1:1 with 270 patients treated with digoxin. In these patients (age 79±8 years, CHA2DS2VASc score 4.0±1.3), 125 deaths were recorded during a follow-up of 2.2±2.7 years (median 1.1, interquartile 0.1–3.5 years, yearly rate of death 10.4%) including 72 cardiovascular deaths (yearly rate 6.0%). Major clinical events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or major bleeding) were recorded in 192 patients (yearly rate 19.1%). In this matched analysis, risk was not statistically significant in the 2 groups for all-cause death (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.67–1.35 for beta-blocker use vs digoxin use), cardiovascular death (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.77–1.96 for beta-blocker use vs digoxin use) or major clinical events (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74–1.31 for beta-blocker use vs digoxin use). Conclusion Our analysis included more patients and had a longer follow-up than in the RATE-AF trial, resulting in a 10-fold higher number of clinical events. We found that among patients with permanent AF and symptoms of HF, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular mortality and major clinical events between those treated with digoxin or beta-blocker. Concerns regarding the use of digoxin, such as the narrow therapeutic window and drug interactions, were not issues resulting in worse clinically relevant cardiovascular outcomes with the approach used in the current study. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Prognosis with beta blocker and digoxin alone or in combination

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 161-162
Author(s):  
L FAUCHIER ◽  
B RAUZY ◽  
E NONIN ◽  
L GORIN ◽  
O MARIE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Beta Blocker

Fluid retention in patients with paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation and heart failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 2402
Author(s):  
V. V. Kirillova ◽  
L. A. Sokolova ◽  
A. A. Garganeyeva ◽  
V. N. Meshchaninov ◽  
R. E. Batalov
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Fluid Retention ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

scholarly journals POSTERS (2)96CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT MONITORING FOR DETECTION OF SUBCLINICAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS97HIGH DAY-TO-DAY INTRA-INDIVIDUAL REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE HEART RATE RESPONSE TO EXERCISE IN THE UK BIOBANK DATA98USE OF NOVEL GLOBAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING AND CONTINUEOUS DIPOLE DENSITY MAPPING TO GUIDE ABLATION IN MACRO-REENTRANT TACHYCARDIAS99ANTICOAGULATION AND THE RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VT AND PVC ABLATION100NON-SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA FREQUENTLY PRECEDES CARDIAC ARREST IN PATIENTS WITH BRUGADA SYNDROME101USING HIGH PRECISION HAEMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS TO ASSESS DIFFERENCES IN AV OPTIMUM BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD POSITIONS IN BIVENTRICULAR PACING102CAN WE PREDICT MEDIUM TERM MORTALITY FROM TRANSVENOUS LEAD EXTRACTION PRE-OPERATIVELY?103PREVENTION OF UNECESSARY ADMISSIONS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION104EPICARDIAL CATHETER ABLATION FOR VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ON UNINTERRUPTED WARFARIN: A SAFE APPROACH?105HOW WELL DOES THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) GUIDENCE ON TRANSIENT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS (T-LoC) WORK IN A REAL WORLD? AN AUDIT OF THE SECOND STAGE SPECIALIST CARDIOVASCULAT ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSIS106DETECTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN COMMUNITY LOCATIONS USING NOVEL TECHNOLOGY'S AS A METHOD OF STROKE PREVENTION IN THE OVER 65'S ASYMPTOMATIC POPULATION - SHOULD IT BECOME STANDARD PRACTISE?107HIGH-DOSE ISOPRENALINE INFUSION AS A METHOD OF INDUCTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A MULTI-CENTRE, PLACEBO CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH VARYING ARRHYTHMIC RISK108PACEMAKER COMPLICATIONS IN A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL109CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY: A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLTAGE OUTPUT AND EJECTION FRACTION?110RAPID DETERIORATION IN LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AND ACUTE HEART FAILURE AFTER DUAL CHAMBER PACEMAKER INSERTION WITH RESOLUTION FOLLOWING BIVENTRICULAR PACING111LOCALLY PERSONALISED ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MODELS FROM PENTARAY CATHETER MEASUREMENTS112EVALUATION OF SUBCUTANEOUS ICD VERSUS TRANSVENOUS ICD- A PROPENSITY MATCHED COST-EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS & OUTCOMES113LOCALISING DRIVERS USING ORGANISATIONAL INDEX IN CONTACT MAPPING OF HUMAN PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION114RISK FACTORS FOR SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH IN PAEDIATRIC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS115EFFECT OF CATHETER STABILITY AND CONTACT FORCE ON VISITAG DENSITY DURING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION116HEPATIC CAPSULE ENHANCEMENT IS COMMONLY SEEN DURING MR-GUIDED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER: A MECHANISTIC INSIGHT INTO PROCEDURAL PAIN117DOES HIGHER CONTACT FORCE IMPAIR LESION FORMATION AT THE CAVOTRICUSPID ISTHMUS? INSIGHTS FROM MR-GUIDED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER118CLINICAL CHARACTERISATION OF A MALIGNANT SCN5A MUTATION IN CHILDHOOD119RADIOFREQUENCY ASSOCIATED VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION120CONTRACTILE RESERVE EXPRESSED AS SYSTOLIC VELOCITY DOES NOT PREDICT RESPONSE TO CRT121DAY-CASE DEVICES - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY USING PATIENT CODING DATA122PATIENTS UNDERGOING SVT ABLATION HAVE A HIGH INCIDENCE OF SECONDARY ARRHYTHMIA ON FOLLOW UP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRE-PROCEDURE COUNSELLING123PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF HAEMOGLOBINN AND RED BLOOD CELL DITRIBUTION WIDTH IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE UNDERGOING CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY124REMOTE MONITORING AND FOLLOW UP DEVICES125A 20-YEAR, SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS (ICD) IN CHILDREN: TIME TO CONSIDER THE SUBCUTANEOUS ICD?126EXPERIENCE OF MAGNETIC REASONANCE IMAGING (MEI) IN PATIENTS WITH MRI CONDITIONAL DEVICES127THE SINUS BRADYCARDIA SEEN IN ATHLETES IS NOT CAUSED BY ENHANCED VAGAL TONE BUT INSTEAD REFLECTS INTRINSIC CHANGES IN THE SINUS NODE REVEALED BY I (F) BLOCKADE128SUCCESSFUL DAY-CASE PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION - AN EIGHT YEAR SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE129LEFT VENTRICULAR INDEX MASS ASSOCIATED WITH ESC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY RISK SCORE IN PATIENTS WITH ICDs: A TERTIARY CENTRE HCM REGISTRY130A DGH EXPERIENCE OF DAY-CASE CARDIAC PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION131IS PRE-PROCEDURAL FASTING A NECESSITY FOR SAFE PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION?

EP Europace ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii47
Author(s):  
T. Philippsen ◽  
M. Orini ◽  
C.A. Martin ◽  
E. Volkova ◽  
J.O.M. Ormerod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Subcutaneous Icd

scholarly journals Plasma natriuretic peptide level is an independent determinant of major clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients without heart failure: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hamatani ◽  
M Iguchi ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of death, stroke/systemic embolism and heart failure (HF). Plasma natriuretic peptide (NP) level is an important prognostic marker in HF patients. However, little is known regarding the prognostic significance of plasma NP level in AF patients without HF. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between plasma NP level and clinical outcomes such as all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization during follow-up period in AF patients without HF. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in our city. The inclusion criterion of the registry is the documentation of AF at 12-lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring at any time, and there are no exclusion criteria. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. From the registry, we excluded 1,220 patients without a pre-existing HF (defined as having one of the following; prior hospitalization for HF, New York Heart Association class ≥2, or left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40%). Among 3,246 AF patients without HF, we investigated 1,189 patients with the data of plasma BNP (n=401) or N-terminal pro-BNP (n=788) level at the enrollment. We divided the patients according to the quartile of each plasma BNP or NT-pro BNP level and compared the backgrounds and outcomes between these 4 groups stratified by plasma NP level. Results Of 1,189 patients, the mean age was 72.1±10.2 years, 454 (38%) were female and 684 (58%) were paroxysmal AF. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score were 1.6±1.1 and 2.9±1.5, respectively. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed in 671 (56%) at baseline. The median (interquartile range) BNP and N-terminal pro-BNP level were 84 (38, 176) and 500 (155, 984) pg/ml, respectively. Patients with high plasma NP level were older, and demonstrated lower prevalence of paroxysmal AF, higher CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulants prescription (all P&lt;0.01). A total of 165 all-cause death, 114 stroke/systemic embolism and 103 HF hospitalization occurred during the median follow-up period of 5.0 years. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that higher plasma NP level was significantly associated with the incidences of all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF (Figure 1A). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that plasma NP level could stratify the risk of clinical outcomes even after adjustment by type of AF, CHA2DS2-VASc score, chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulant prescription (Figure 1B). Conclusion Plasma NP level is a significant prognostic marker for all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF, suggesting the importance of measuring plasma NP level in AF patients even without HF. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Long-term impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction on heart failure: insights from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L Xu ◽  
J Luo ◽  
H.Q Li ◽  
Z.Q Li ◽  
B.X Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with poor survival, but the clinical implication of NOAF on subsequent heart failure (HF) is still not well studied. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NOAF following AMI and HF hospitalization. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2014 and March 2018, using data from the New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in ShangHai registry, where all participants did not have a documented AF history. Patients with AMI who discharged alive and had complete echocardiography and follow-up data were analyzed. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization, which was defined as a minimum of an overnight hospital stay of a participant who presented with symptoms and signs of HF or received intravenous diuretics. Results A total of 2075 patients were included, of whom 228 developed NOAF during the index AMI hospitalization. During up to 5 years of follow-up (median: 2.7 years), 205 patients (9.9%) experienced HF hospitalization and 220 patients (10.6%) died. The incidence rate of HF hospitalization among patients with NOAF was 18.4% per year compared with 2.8% per year for those with sinus rhythm. After adjustment for confounders, NOAF was significantly associated with HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.30–4.28; p&lt;0.001). Consistent result was observed after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause death (subdistribution HR: 3.06, 95% CI: 2.18–4.30; p&lt;0.001) or performing a propensity score adjusted multivariable model (HR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.39–4.50; p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, the risk of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with persistent NOAF (HR: 5.81; 95% CI: 3.59–9.41) compared with that in those with transient NOAF (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.84–3.70; p interaction = 0.008). Conclusion NOAF complicating AMI is strongly associated with an increased long-term risk of heart. Cumulative incidence of outcome Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): 1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document