A MULTICENTER, OPEN LABEL, UNCONTROLLED, PHASE II TRIAL EVALUATING SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF VENETOCLAX, ATEZOLIZUMAB ANDOBINUTUZUMAB IN RICHTER TRANSFORMATION FROM CLL

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 557-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Montillo ◽  
D. Rossi ◽  
E. Zucca ◽  
A.M. Frustaci ◽  
S. Pileri ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0235381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabella Picinin Safe ◽  
Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda ◽  
Vitoria Silva Printes ◽  
Adriana Ferreira Praia Marins ◽  
Amanda Lia Rebelo Rabelo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8588-8588 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Samuel DiCapua Siegel ◽  
Paul Gerard Guy Richardson ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
Rachid C. Baz ◽  
...  

8588 Background: MM-002 is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of POM with or without LoDEX in advanced RRMM pts. Methods: Pts who had received ≥ 2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), and were refractory to their last treatment were randomized to POM+LoDEX (POM 4 mg/day, days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle; LoDEX 40 mg/week) or POM alone. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (according to EBMT criteria and investigator assessment), response duration, overall survival (OS), and safety. The efficacy outcomes are based on the intent-to-treat population (POM+LoDEX, n = 113; POM, n = 108). Results: The median number of prior therapies in each group was 5 (range 1–13). In the POM+LoDEX arm, 30 (27%) pts had high-risk cytogenetics, including del(17p13) and/or t(4p16/14q32). The overall response rate (≥ partial response) was 34% and 15% with POM+LoDEX and POM, respectively, with a median duration of 8.3 (95% CI: 5.8–10.1) and 8.8 (95% CI: 5.5–11.4) mos, respectively. At least minimal response was observed in 45% and 31% of pts, respectively. Median PFS was 4.6 (95% CI: 3.6–5.5) and 2.6 (95% CI: 1.9–2.8) mos with POM+LoDEX and POM, respectively, with a median follow-up of 16.0 and 12.2 mos. Median OS was 16.5 (95% CI: 12.4–18.5) and 13.6 (95% CI: 9.6–18.1) mos, respectively. The most common treatment emergent Gr 3/4 adverse events (AEs) reported in the safety population (n = 219) were neutropenia (44%), anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (21%), and pneumonia (18%); there were no reports of Gr 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis was low (2%). AEs were managed through dose reductions or interruptions, and supportive care with G-CSF (52%), RBC transfusions (47%), and platelet transfusions (17%). Discontinuations due to AEs were 10%. Conclusions: POM with or without LoDEX is clinically effective and generally well tolerated in RRMM pts who have received multiple prior treatments, including LEN and BORT. AEs were predictable and manageable. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00833833.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1050-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jean Khoury ◽  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Selim Corm ◽  
Lydia Roy ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
...  

Abstract HHT [USAN/INN designation - omacetaxine mepesuccinate] is an ester of cephalotaxine with activity in CML independent from tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibition. HHT is also active against Ba/F3 cell lines transfected with various BCR-ABL kinase domain (KD) mutants, including the T315I mutation. BCR-ABL positive cells with the T315I mutation are resistant, both in vitro and in vivo, to IM, as well as 2nd generation TK inhibitors (TKIs), such as dasatinib, nilotinib and bosutinib. Given the lack of active agents in this unique patient (Pt) population, we are conducting a multicenter open-label phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of SC HHT in Pts with IM-resistant T315I+ CML in all phases of the disease. The presence of T315I is confirmed at 2 reference labs. Peripheral blood BCR-ABL transcript levels are determined during HHT therapy by qRT-PCR and BCR-ABL KD mutation analyses. Induction consists of repeated cycles of HHT, 1.25 mg/m2 twice daily SC for 14 consecutive days every (q) 28 days until complete hematologic response (CHR) or hematologic improvement. Pts can receive maintenance HHT, 1.25 mg/m2 twice daily SC for 7 days q 28 days, until progression or for up to 24 mo. To date, 19 Pts with Ph+ CML with T315I have been enrolled, 11 in chronic (CP), 4 in accelerated (AP), 4 in blast (BP) phase. Median age is 56 yrs (23 to 79). Pts have failed a median 2 (1 to 8+) prior therapies, including IM (19), dasatinib (10), nilotinib (8), MK-0457 (3), ara-C (5), anthracyclines (3), interferon (2). Median T315I transcript level at baseline is 50% (20–100%). All Pts have completed at least one induction course of HHT, 10 Pts completed 2 courses, 2 Pts 3, and 1 Pt 4. Five Pts are on maintenance HHT (1–7+ mo). SC HHT is well tolerated; no Pt has discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Hyperglycemia, cardiac arrhythmia, and hypotension have not been reported, and local injection reactions are uncommon. One Pt experienced acute coronary syndrome due to HHT-induced anemia. Cycle 2 treatment delays due to neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia have occurred in 7 of 14 Pts (1–41 days). 4 Pts have experienced progressive disease [1 in CP (splenomegaly, ↑BCR-ABL), 1 AP, 2 BP] after 1–2 induction cycles and were taken off study. T315I transcript levels are no longer detectable in 1 AP and 4 CP Pts, 2 of whom have achieved CHR (1 recently achieved, 1 maintained 7+ mo). In summary, current data from this phase II trial indicate that HHT has an acceptable safety profile and activity in Pts with IM-resistant CML. The SC route offers a convenient dosing format for self administration. Additional enrollment and longer follow-up will determine whether HHT provides a therapeutic option in highly-resistant CML Pts with T315I BCR-ABL KD mutation who have failed one or more TKIs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Amaral ◽  
Heike Niessner ◽  
Tobias Sinnberg ◽  
Ioannis Thomas ◽  
Andreas Meiwes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) still carry a dismal prognosis. Preclinical data originated in xenograft models showed that buparlisib therapy was highly effective in therapy-naïve MBM. Patients and Methods In this open-label, phase II trial, we investigate the safety and efficacy of monotherapy with buparlisib, a PI3K inhibitor, in patients with asymptomatic MBM who were not candidates for local therapy. These patients had also progressed under immunotherapy if BRAF wild-type or under targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors if carrying a BRAFV600E/K mutation. The primary endpoint was the intracranial disease control rate assessed by the investigators. The secondary endpoints were overall response rate, duration of response (DOR) of intracranial disease, overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability of buparlisib. Results A total of 20 patients were screened and 17 patients were treated with buparlisib. Twelve patients had progressed under more than 2 systemic therapy lines and 17 had received at least 1 previous local therapy. There were no intracranial responses. Three patients achieved intracranial stable disease; the median DOR was 117 days. The median PFS was 42 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23–61 days) and the median OS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.24–7.76 months). No new safety signs were observed. Conclusions Buparlisib was well tolerated but no intracranial responses were observed. These results might be explained in part by the inclusion of only heavily pretreated patients. However, preclinical data strongly support the rationale to explore PI3K inhibitor-based combinations in patients with MBM displaying hyperactivation of the PI3K–AKT pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document