Heat‐in‐leak and longitudinal wall heat conduction influence on three‐fluid cross‐flow heat exchanger performance

Heat Transfer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyothiprakash K. H. ◽  
Seetharamu K. N.



2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 981-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. B. Younis


1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 746-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Baclic


1964 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Bahnke ◽  
C. P. Howard

A numerical finite-difference method of calculating the effectiveness for the periodic-flow type heat exchanger accounting for the effect of longitudinal heat conduction in the direction of fluid flow is presented. The method considers the metal stream in crossflow with each of the gas streams as two separate but dependent heat exchangers. To accommodate the large number of divisions necessary for accuracy and extrapolation to zero element area, use was made of a general purpose digital computer. The values of the effectiveness thus obtained are good to four significant figures while those values for the conduction effect are good to three significant figures. The exchanger effectiveness and conduction effect have been evaluated over the following range of dimensionless parameters. 1.0⩾Cmin/Cmax⩾0.901.0⩽Cr/Cmin⩽∞1.0⩽NTU0⩽1001.0⩾(hA)*⩾0.251.0⩾As*⩾0.250.01⩽λ⩽0.32



2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Diani ◽  
Luisa Rossetto ◽  
Roberto Dall’Olio ◽  
Daniele De Zen ◽  
Filippo Masetto

Cross flow heat exchangers, when applied to cool data center rooms, use external air (process air) to cool the air stream coming from the data center room (primary air). However, an air–air heat exchanger is not enough to cope with extreme high heat loads in critical conditions (high external temperature). Therefore, water can be sprayed in the process air to increase the heat dissipation capability (wet mode). Water evaporates, and the heat flow rate is transferred to the process air as sensible and latent heat. This paper proposes an analytical approach to predict the behavior of a cross flow heat exchanger in wet mode. The theoretical results are then compared to experimental tests carried out on a real machine in wet mode conditions. Comparisons are given in terms of calculated versus experimental heat flow rate and evaporated water mass flow rate, showing a good match between theoretical and experimental values.





1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. E. M. Saboya ◽  
C. E. S. M. da Costa

From the second law of thermodynamics, the concepts of irreversibility, entropy generation, and availability are applied to counterflow, parallel-flow, and cross-flow heat exchangers. In the case of the Cross-flow configuration, there are four types of heat exchangers: I) both fluids unmixed, 2) both fluids mixed, 3) fluid of maximum heat capacity rate mixed and the other unmixed, 4) fluid of minimum heat capacity rate mixed and the other unmixed. In the analysis, the heat exchangers are assumed to have a negligible pressure drop irreversibility. The Counterflow heat exchanger is compared with the other five heat exchanger types and the comparison will indicate which one has the minimum irreversibility rate. In this comparison, only the exit temperatures and the heat transfer rates of the heat exchangers are different. The other conditions (inlet temperatures, mass flow rates, number of transfer units) and the working fluids are the same in the heat exchangers.



2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Delnero ◽  
Dave Dreisigmeyer ◽  
Douglas Hittle ◽  
Peter Young ◽  
Charles Anderson ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document