scholarly journals Metals fate and transport modelling in streams and watersheds: state of the science and USEPA workshop review

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 4011-4021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Caruso ◽  
T. J. Cox ◽  
R. L. Runkel ◽  
M. L. Velleux ◽  
K. E. Bencala ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 193-199
Author(s):  
Byung-Gi Hwang ◽  
Kwan-Soo Jun ◽  
Young-Dae Lee ◽  
Wu-Seng Lung

Contaminants in the interstitial waters are not only dissolved but also associated with a filterable colloidal phase such as DOC. The DOC plays an important role regulating the distribution of chemicals between particulate and dissolved phases since it binds chemicals and makes them unavailable for vertical diffusive exchange. A three-phase partitioning model that consists of free-dissolved, DOC-bound, particulate-bound components of the chemicals involved is used for the contaminant transport model in order to include the effect of DOC on the partition coefficient. The contaminant model is linked to WASP modeling framework to predict remobilization of PCBs in sediments and the fate and transport of the contaminant in overlying waters of the New Bedford Harbor where the harbor has been contaminated with PCBs and heavy metals released from electronic capacitor manufacturers. Simulation of remedial controls indicates that if no action is taken, PCB concentrations will continue to be at elevated levels. Several scenarios for the removal of contaminated sediments have been performed to reduce the elevated PCB concentrations to background levels.


2019 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 35-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Locatelli ◽  
Philip J. Binning ◽  
Xavier Sanchez-Vila ◽  
Gitte Lemming Søndergaard ◽  
Louise Rosenberg ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 38-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hwa Cho ◽  
Yakov A. Pachepsky ◽  
David M. Oliver ◽  
Richard W. Muirhead ◽  
Yongeun Park ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sharon P. Nappier ◽  
Krista Liguori ◽  
Audrey M. Ichida ◽  
Jill R. Stewart ◽  
Kaedra R. Jones

Ambient recreational waters can act as both recipients and natural reservoirs for antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria and antimicrobial resistant genes (ARGs), where they may persist and replicate. Contact with AMR bacteria and ARGs potentially puts recreators at risk, which can thus decrease their ability to fight infections. A variety of point and nonpoint sources, including contaminated wastewater effluents, runoff from animal feeding operations, and sewer overflow events, can contribute to environmental loading of AMR bacteria and ARGs. The overall goal of this article is to provide the state of the science related to recreational exposure and AMR, which has been an area of increasing interest. Specific objectives of the review include (1) a description of potential sources of antibiotics, AMR bacteria, and ARGs in recreational waters, as documented in the available literature; (2) a discussion of what is known about human recreational exposures to AMR bacteria and ARGs, using findings from health studies and exposure assessments; and (3) identification of knowledge gaps and future research needs. To better understand the dynamics related to AMR and associated recreational water risks, future research should focus on source contribution, fate and transport—across treatment and in the environment; human health risk assessment; and standardized methods.


1986 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. McCorquodale ◽  
Kamal Ibrahim ◽  
Yousry Hamdy

Abstract The response of the St. Clair River system (water column and bed sediments) to a spill of perchloroethylene (PERC) is predicted by application of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) TOXIWASP fate transport model. The spill occurred from August 13 to 16, 1986 at the Dow Chemical of Canada Inc. site. The estimated quantity of the spill was 18000 kg of which approximately 10,000 kg initially settled out In the vicinity of the Dow Chemical outfalls. At the end of 30 days the model indicated that about 12600 kg had been discharged to Lake St. Clair while 4500 kg and 90 kg remained on the river bed and in temporary storage in the water column respectively. Approximately 5% of the original spill was volatilized in the river during the 30 days after the spill.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document