scholarly journals Dietary cadmium and risk of breast cancer subtypes defined by hormone receptor status: A prospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (9) ◽  
pp. 2153-2160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Grioni ◽  
Claudia Agnoli ◽  
Vittorio Krogh ◽  
Valeria Pala ◽  
Sabina Rinaldi ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan E. Cunningham ◽  
Alberto J. Montero ◽  
Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Hans J. Berkel ◽  
Bert Ely

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e000829
Author(s):  
Mariana Brandão ◽  
Assucena Guisseve ◽  
Genoveva Bata ◽  
Matos Alberto ◽  
Josefo Ferro ◽  
...  

BackgroundData regarding breast cancer epidemiology, treatment and survival in Africa are scarce. We aimed to assess the distribution of breast cancer subtypes in Mozambique and its impact on patients’ treatment and survival. The concordance of biomarker assessment between cytological and histological samples was also evaluated.MethodsProspective cohort study including 210 patients diagnosed between January 2015 and August 2017, followed to November 2019. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared across classic tumour subtypes (oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)) and surrogate intrinsic subtypes (St. Gallen classification). Concordance was measured using Cohen’s κ statistics.ResultsA total of 51% of patients had ER-positive/HER2-negative tumours, 24% HER2-positive and 25% TNBC. Concordance between cytological and histological samples regarding ER and HER2 status was substantial (κ=0.762 and κ=0.603, respectively). There were no significant differences across subtypes regarding clinical characteristics and treatment, except for HIV positivity and high histological grade (more prevalent among TNBC) or endocrine therapy (higher use among ER-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive patients). Three-year OS was 52.5% (95% CI, 44.3% to 60.0%), being higher in ER-positive/HER2-negative (61.1%) compared with HER2-positive (53.2%) and TNBC (31.9%) patients. Adjusted HRs were 1.96 (95% CI, 1.13 to 3.39) among HER2-positive and 3.10 (95% CI, 1.81 to 5.31) among TNBC versus ER-positive/HER2-negative patients. Three-year DFS was 46.6% (95% CI, 38.0% to 54.8%), being lower among TNBC versus ER-positive/HER2-negative patients (HR 2.91; 95% CI, 1.64 to 5.16). Results were similar between surrogate intrinsic subtypes.ConclusionThere was a high proportion of HER2-positive and TNBC among Mozambican patients and their survival was poor compared with ER-positive/HER2-negative patients, partly due to the limited treatment options. A systematic assessment of ER, PR and HER2 status is feasible and may help tailoring and optimise the treatment of patients with breast cancer in low-resource settings, potentially leading to survival gains in this underserved population.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e0144680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loreta Strumylaite ◽  
Stephen J. Sharp ◽  
Rima Kregzdyte ◽  
Lina Poskiene ◽  
Algirdas Bogusevicius ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document