scholarly journals Effect of aspirin and other NSAIDs on postmenopausal breast cancer incidence by hormone receptor status: results from a prospective cohort study

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Janet E. Olson ◽  
Celine M. Vachon ◽  
DeAnn Lazovich ◽  
Robert A. Vierkant ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher I. Li ◽  
Janet R. Daling ◽  
Kathleen E. Malone

Purpose: Between 1987 and 1998, breast cancer incidence rates rose 0.5%/yr in the United States. A question of potential etiologic and clinical importance is whether the hormone receptor status of breast tumors is also changing over time. This is because hormone receptor status may reflect different etiologic pathways and is useful in predicting response to adjuvant therapy and prognosis. Methods: Age-adjusted, age-specific breast cancer incidence rates by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status from 1992 to 1998 were obtained and compared from 11 population-based cancer registries in the United States that participate in the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Results: From 1992 to1998, the overall proportion of breast cancers that were ER-positive and PR-positive increased from 75.4% to 77.5% (P = .0002) and from 65.0% to 67.7% (P < .0001), respectively, continuing trends observed before 1992. These increases were limited to women 40 to 69 years of age. The proportions of ER-positive/PR-positive tumors increased from 56.7% to 62.3% (P = .0010) among 40- to 49-year-olds, from 58.0% to 63.2% (P = .0002) among 50- to 59-year-olds, and from 63.2% to 67.9% (P = .0020) among 60- to 69-year-olds. Conclusion: From 1992 to 1998, the proportion of tumors that are hormone receptor–positive rose as the proportion of hormone receptor–negative tumors declined. Because the incidence rates of hormone receptor–negative tumors remained fairly constant over these years, the overall rise in breast cancer incidence rates in the United States seems to be primarily a result of the increase in the incidence of hormone receptor–positive tumors. Hormonal factors may account for this trend.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10573-10573
Author(s):  
Shuai Xu ◽  
Yunan Han ◽  
Fei Wan ◽  
Adetunji T. Toriola

10573 Background: Breast cancer in young women is diagnosed at more advanced stages and has a less favorable prognosis. We investigated trends in breast cancer incidence by race/ethnicity, hormone receptor status, and tumor stage in women aged 20-49 years over the past 25 years, as well as the impact of period and cohort effects on these trends. Methods: We used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 13 registries for 1993-2002 and SEER 18 registries for 2003-2017. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates and annual percent change (APC), and stratified by race/ethnicity, hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]), and tumor stage (I-IV) for 222,424 women aged 20-49 years with a primary invasive breast cancer. We performed age-period-cohort analysis (presented as incidence rate ratios [IRR]) to investigate the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence trends using the 1948 cohort and 1993-1997 period as the reference groups, respectively. Results: Between 2010-2017, invasive breast cancer incidence increased (APC = 0.67%, 95%CI: 0.32 to 1.03) among women aged 20-49 years, after being stable from 1993-2010. There were differences by race over the 25-year period (1993-2017). We observed significant increases in incidence among non-Hispanic White (NHW) (APC = 0.25%, 95%CI: 0.16 to 0.34), non-Hispanic Asia/Pacific Islander (NHAPI) (APC = 0.58%, 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.82), and Hispanic women (APC = 0.59%, 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.83), but not among non-Hispanic black (NHB) women (APC = 0.14%, 95%CI: -0.06 to 0.34). Incidence increased for ER+ tumors but decreased for ER- tumors: ER+/PR+ (APC = 2.39%, 95%CI: 2.20 to 2.58), ER+/PR- (APC = 1.46%, 95%CI: 1.05 to 1.87), ER-/PR+ (APC = -6.33%, 95%CI: -7.31 to -5.33), and ER-/PR- (APC = -0.70%, 95%CI: -1.09 to -0.32). The decrease in ER-/PR- tumors appeared largely driven by decreases among HNW women. Incidence for stages I (APC = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.07 to 0.55), II (APC = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.82 to 1.16), and IV (APC = 2.88, 95%CI: 2.37 to 3.39) tumors increased while that for stage III tumors decreased (APC = 0.81%, 95%CI: -1.04 to -0.59). Both the cohort and period effects impacted incidence, with the cohort effect almost 10 times larger than the period effect. Age-specific relative risk by birth cohort initially decreased between 1948 and 1958 but steadily increased from 1958 to 1993. Breast cancer incidence was higher among women born in the 1988 (IRR = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.07 to 1.28) and 1993 (IRR = 1.22, 95%CI: 0.99 to 1.51) cohorts than for those born in 1948 cohort. Conclusions: Breast cancer incidence is increasing among young women, mainly driven by increases in ER+ tumors. Prevention efforts need to focus on how we can address factors driving the increase in ER+ tumors and also learn from what has worked for decreasing ER- tumors.


2009 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhojit Dey ◽  
Amr S. Soliman ◽  
Ahmad Hablas ◽  
Ibrahim A. Seifeldin ◽  
Kadry Ismail ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Mertens ◽  
Carol Sweeney ◽  
Eyal Shahar ◽  
Wayne D. Rosamond ◽  
and Aaron R. Folsom

2021 ◽  
pp. BJGP.2021.0475
Author(s):  
Rajiv Dave ◽  
Hannah Louise Bromley ◽  
Vicky Taxiarchi ◽  
Elizabeth Camacho ◽  
Nicola Barnes ◽  
...  

Background Women with breast pain constitute upto 20% of breast clinic attendees. Aim: To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care. Design & Setting: Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months. Methods: Women were categorised by presentation into 4 distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated. Results: Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms,1670 (15%) with ‘other’ symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in 8 (0.7%). In 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ~5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using ‘breast lump’ as reference, odds ratio (OR) of women referred with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09; P<0.001). Compared to reassurance in primary-care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss -0.012) Greatest impact on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss due to referral associated anxiety was excluded. Primary-care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45,528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service cost-effectiveness thresholds. Conclusions: This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document