Entrustable professional activities framework for assessment in predoctoral dental education, developed using a modified Delphi process

Author(s):  
Vidya Ramaswamy ◽  
Mark Fitzgerald ◽  
Theodora Danciu ◽  
Romesh Nalliah ◽  
Tracy Peralta ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e047923
Author(s):  
Akihito Tanaka ◽  
Takeshi Kondo ◽  
Yuka Urushibara-Miyachi ◽  
Shoichi Maruyama ◽  
Hiroshi Nishigori

ObjectivesTraining strategies regarding entrustable professional activities (EPAs) vary from country to country; one such strategy is for residents. However, there are no reports of EPAs developed for residents who rotate to the nephrology departments. We aimed to construct such EPAs, which could be generalised to other institutions.DesignPurposive design and a modified Delphi method to build consensus.SettingThe department of nephrology in a university hospital in Aichi Prefecture, Japan.ParticipantsBased on the attainment goals used in our department, an initial list was developed within the research group. The expert panel included 25 nephrologists from our affiliate hospital. Responses were based on a 5-point method and agreement was reached if both (A) and (B) were met: (A) mean≥4 with a SD <1; (B) more than 75% of respondents rated the item 4 or more. With agreement, the item was left for the next round. This round was repeated.ResultsAn initial list of 11 items was developed; after three Delphi rounds and revisions, eight items remained that were then established as the final EPAs. These items can serve as a list of goals to be reached by residents who rotate to the department of nephrology. The results indicated that most of the experts believed residents should be able to perform tasks deemed necessary or urgent for all physicians, such as those that deal with hyperkalaemia and heart failure.ConclusionsThe concept of EPAs enabled us to develop goals and evaluation criteria for residents’ training in nephrology. This study can serve as a springboard for future discussions and contribute to the development of resident education in nephrology.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen F. Shaughnessy ◽  
Jennifer Sparks ◽  
Molly Cohen-Osher ◽  
Kristen H. Goodell ◽  
Gregory L. Sawin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project intended to move residency education toward assessing and documenting resident competence in 6 dimensions of performance important to the practice of medicine. Although the project defined a set of general attributes of a good physician, it did not define the actual activities that a competent physician performs in practice in the given specialty. These descriptions have been called entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Objective We sought to develop a list of EPAs for ambulatory practice in family medicine to guide curriculum development and resident assessment. Methods We developed an initial list of EPAs over the course of 3 years, and we refined it further by obtaining the opinion of experts using a Delphi Process. The experts participating in this study were recruited from 2 groups of family medicine leaders: organizers and participants in the Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice initiative, and members of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Task Force on Competency Assessment. The experts participated in 2 rounds of anonymous, Internet-based surveys. Results A total of 22 experts participated, and 21 experts participated in both rounds of the Delphi Process. The Delphi Process reduced the number of competency areas from 91 to 76 areas, with 3 additional competency areas added in round 1. Conclusions This list of EPAs developed through our Delphi process can be used as a starting point for family medicine residency programs interested in moving toward a competency-based approach to resident education and assessment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (9) ◽  
pp. 945-948
Author(s):  
Michael D. Wolcott ◽  
Rocio B. Quinonez ◽  
Vidya Ramaswamy ◽  
Carol Anne Murdoch‐Kinch

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaomi Kessoku ◽  
Yu Uneno ◽  
Yuka Urushibara-Miyach ◽  
Kiyofumi Oya ◽  
Akihiko Kusakabe ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Appropriate delivery of death pronouncements potentially affects bereaved families’ wellbeing positively. Younger physicians need to learn death pronouncement skills; currently, the competencies and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in death pronouncement practice have not been clarified.Therefore, this study aimed to develop a list of competencies and EPAs necessary for death pronouncement practice, which resident physicians need to acquire by the end of their residency training (postgraduate year 2).Methods: An anonymous modified Delphi study was conducted with a panel of 31 experts. The experts were invited online from general wards in hospitals with resident physicians across Japan to participate in the study using the purposive and snowball sampling method. A non-anonymous web conference was held with three additional external evaluators to finalize the item list. The consensus criterion was defined as a mean response of at least 4 points on a 5-point Likert scale for each competency and EPA item and a rating of 4 or 5 points by at least 80% of the participants.Results: Consensus was achieved, with consistently high levels of agreement across panel members, on 11 competencies and 9 EPA items. Additionally, a correspondence matrix table between competencies and EPAs was developed.Conclusions: This study clarified the standardized educational outcomes for knowledge, skills, and attitudes in death pronouncement practice and the level of physicians who can perform this practice independently, serving as a blueprint to aid the development of an educational model and evaluation method for clinical educational institutions and developers of medical school curriculums.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248565
Author(s):  
Marije P. Hennus ◽  
Anneliese Nusmeier ◽  
Gwen G. M. van Heesch ◽  
Maaike A. Riedijk ◽  
Nikki J. Schoenmaker ◽  
...  

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs), as a focus of learner assessment, are supported by validity evidence. An EPA is a unit of professional practice requiring proficiency in multiple competencies simultaneously, that can be entrusted to a sufficiently competent learner. Taken collectively, a set of EPAs define and inform the curriculum of a specialty training. The goal of this study was to develop a set of EPAs for Dutch PICU fellows. A multistage methodology was employed incorporating sequential input from task force members, a medical education expert, PICU fellowship program directors, and PICU physicians and fellows via a modified three-round Delphi study. In the first modified Delphi round, experts rated indispensability and clarity of preliminary EPAs. In the subsequent rounds, aggregated scores for each EPA and group comments were provided. In round two, respondents rated indispensability and clarity of revised EPAs. Round three was used to gain explicit confirmation of suitability to implement these EPAs. Based on median ratings and content validity index (CVI) analysis for indispensability in the first two rounds, all nine preliminary EPAs covered activities that were deemed essential to the clinical practice of PICU physicians. Based on median ratings and CVI analysis for clarity however, four EPAs needed revision. With an agreement percentage of 93–100% for all individual EPAs as well as the set as a whole, a high degree of consensus among experts was reached in the third round. The resulting nine PICU EPAs provide a succinct overview of the core tasks of Dutch PICU physicians. These EPAs were created as an essential first step towards developing an assessment system for PICU fellows, grounded in core professional activities. The robust methodology used, may have broad applicability for other (sub)specialty training programs aiming to develop specialty specific EPAs.


2006 ◽  
Vol 67 (S1) ◽  
pp. S14-S29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Brauer ◽  
Linda Dietrich ◽  
Bridget Davidson ◽  

Purpose: A modified Delphi process was used to identify key features of interdisciplinary nutrition services, including provider roles and responsibilities for Ontario Family Health Networks (FHNs), a family physician-based type of primary care. Methods: Twenty-three representatives from interested professional organizations, including three FHN demonstration sites, completed a modified Delphi process. Participants reviewed evidence from a systematic literature review, a patient survey, a costing analysis, and key informant interview results before undertaking the Delphi process. Statements describing various options for services were developed at an in-person meeting, which was followed by two rounds of e-mail questionnaires. Teleconference discussions were held between rounds. Results: An interdisciplinary model with differing and complementary roles for health care providers emerged from the process. Additional key features addressing screening for nutrition problems, health promotion and disease prevention, team collaboration, planning and evaluation, administrative support, access to care, and medical directives/delegated acts were identified. Under the proposed model, the registered dietitian is the team member responsible for managing all aspects of nutrition services, from needs assessment to program delivery, as well as for supporting all providers’ nutrition services. Conclusions: The proposed interdisciplinary nutrition services model merits evaluation of cost, effectiveness, applicability, and sustainability in team-based primary care service settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document