Proton‐pump inhibitors elevate infection rate in cardiothoracic surgery patients by influencing PMN function in vitro and in vivo

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolin Maria Haas ◽  
Martina Maywald ◽  
Andreas Goetzenich ◽  
Christian Stoppe ◽  
Lothar Rink
2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao Yan ◽  
Zhu-feng Wu ◽  
Dan Tang ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Yi-wen Xiao ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1475-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Shin ◽  
J.Y. Lee ◽  
D.Y. Lee ◽  
T.Y. Yoon ◽  
J.C. Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 309-309
Author(s):  
Hanan Goldberg ◽  
Faizan Moshin ◽  
Refik Saskin ◽  
Girish S. Kulkarni ◽  
Alejandro Berlin ◽  
...  

309 Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a commonly prescribed class of medications. Although in-vitro and in-vivo data have shown PPIs to have anti-tumor effects, more recent studies suggest an increased cancer risk in several solid organs. Pantoprazole, a commonly prescribed PPI, has been shown to harbor a protective effect in human prostate cancer (PCa) cells. We aimed to investigate the effect of pantoprazole and other PPIs on PCa-specific death and additional PCa outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, data were incorporated from the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences to identify all men aged 66 and above with a history of a single negative prostate biopsy between 1994 and 2016. We used multivariable Cox regression models with time-dependent covariates, to assess the effect of PPIs on PCa diagnosis, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use, and PCa-specific death. All models included other medications with a putative effect on PCa. All models were adjusted for age, rurality, comorbidity, and year of patient study inclusion. Results: Overall, 21,512 men were included, with a mean follow-up time of 8.06 years (SD 5.44 years). A total of 10,999 patients (51.1%) used a PPI. A total of 5,187 patients (24.1%) were diagnosed with PCa, 2,043 patients (9.5%) were treated with ADT, and 805 patients (3.7%) died from PCa. Pantoprazole was associated with a 3.0% (95% CI 0.3%-6,0%) increased rate of being treated with ADT for every six months of cumulative use, while any use of all other PPIs was associated with a 39.0% (95% CI 18.0%-64.0%) increased PCa-specific mortality. No significant association was found with PCa diagnosis. Conclusions: Upon validation of the potentially negative association of PPIs with PCa outcomes, the expansive use of PPIs may need to be reassessed, especially in PCa patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard Ollier ◽  
Sophie Hodin ◽  
Thierry Basset ◽  
Sandrine Accassat ◽  
Laurent Bertoletti ◽  
...  

Digestion ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Jeong Lim ◽  
Tri M. Phan ◽  
Elizabeth J. Dial ◽  
David Y. Graham ◽  
Lenard M. Lichtenberger

Drug Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 484-488
Author(s):  
Avik Ray ◽  
Swati Sharma ◽  
Balakrishnan Sadasivam

AbstractAlthough the major therapeutic uses of the proton pump inhibitors are in gastric-acid related diseases, evidences are suggestive of a pleiotropic nature of the compounds. We comment on the probable pathways and cellular machineries via which proton pump inhibitors could show beneficial therapeutic effects against SARS-CoV-2 based on the existing evidences. Proton pump inhibitors have shown antiviral potencies in various in vivo and in vitro studies. Some of the major possible ways through which they can act against SARS-CoV-2 are by exerting anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects, via vacuolar ATPase pumps leading to raised endolysosomal pH and by targeting endosomal complexes. The current pandemic has put forward a challenge to find treatment options. Although the potential roles of proton pump inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 have been discussed in recent publications, the clinical evidences for their real-world effectiveness do not point towards a beneficial effect clearly yet. We suggest that although proton pump inhibitors should strongly be considered as potential therapeutic options for COVID-19, larger studies in the form of randomized controlled trials would be required to arrive at a definite conclusion.


1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
J E Sjöström ◽  
J Fryklund ◽  
T Kühler ◽  
H Larsson

Factors affecting the in vitro antibacterial activity of omeprazole were studied. Our data show that 3H-labeled omeprazole covalently bound to Helicobacter pylori and to other gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. The compound was found to bind to a broad range of proteins in H. pylori, and at pH 5, binding was enhanced 15-fold compared with binding at pH 7. The bactericidal activity correlated to the degree of binding, and at pH 5, a pH at which omeprazole readily converts to the active sulfenamide form, beta-mercaptoethanol, a known scavenger of sulfenamide, and fetal calf serum, to which noncovalent protein binding of omeprazole is known to occur, reduced the level of binding and almost entirely abolished the bactericidal activity. At pH 7 the killing activities of omeprazole and structural analogs (e.g., proton pump inhibitors) were dependent on the time-dependent conversion (half-life) to the corresponding sulfenamide. The bactericidal activity exerted by the sulfenamide form at pH 5 was not specific for the genus Helicobacter. However, in brucella broth at pH 7 with 10% fetal calf serum, only Helicobacter spp. were susceptible to omeprazole, with MBCs in the range of 32 to 64 micrograms/ml, and MBCs for more stable proton pump inhibitors were higher. Wild-type H. pylori and its isogenic urease-deficient mutant were equally susceptible to omeprazole. Thus, the urease is not a lethal target for omeprazole action in H. pylori. In conclusion, the antibacterial activities of omeprazole and analogs are dependent on pH and the composition of the medium used. Thus, at a low pH in buffer, these compounds have a nonselective action, whereas in broth at neutral pH, the mechanism of action is selective for Helicobacter spp.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document