Evaluation of GCF IL‐17, IL‐10, TWEAK and sclerostin levels after SRP and adjunctive use of diode laser application in periodontitis patients

Author(s):  
Ali Tugrul Gur ◽  
Guliz N. Guncu ◽  
Abdullah C. Akman ◽  
Asli Pinar ◽  
Erdem Karabulut ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 689-698
Author(s):  
Andrzej Klimpel ◽  
Damian Janicki ◽  
Aleksander Lisiecki ◽  
Ziemowit Wilk

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suné Mulder-van Staden ◽  
Haly Holmes ◽  
Jos Hille

AbstractAssessment of the efficacy of a single 810 nm diode laser application as an adjunctive treatment modality during the first intervention of non-surgical periodontal therapy (NPT). 25 patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis underwent a split-mouth randomised control trial. The periodontal pockets of the test quadrants were treated with an 810 nm diode laser as an adjunct to NPT (Picasso GaAlAs; AMD Lasers). The laser was set at 1.0 W continuous wave, 400 µm tip, 796 W/cm2 peak power density and a 32 J/cm2 energy density. Therapeutic outcomes were evaluated based on the clinical parameters, which included probing pocket depth, recession, clinical attachment level, full mouth plaque score, full mouth bleeding on probing and tooth mobility. The baseline bacterial collection was completed from the periodontal pockets and then re-evaluated at 6 weeks. Clinical parameters demonstrated no statistical difference, with the exception of a statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduction in bleeding on probing for the test side. The test side resulted in a statistical increase of Capnocytophagaspecies and Treponemadenticola. The single application of the diode laser did not significantly improve the bacterial nor the clinical parameters in patients with chronic periodontitis.Trial registration number: PACTR201909915338276.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafał Flieger ◽  
Tomasz Gedrange ◽  
Kinga Grzech-Leśniak ◽  
Marzena Dominiak ◽  
Jacek Matys

Background: The study aimed to clinically estimate an influence of a 635 nm diode laser on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants, to assess mini-implants loss, and to evaluate a pain level after the treatment. Materials and Methods: The randomized clinical split-mouth trial included 20 subjects (13 women and 7 men; age: 32.5 ± 6.1 years), 40 implants (RMO, West Colfax Ave., Denver, CO, USA) with a diameter 1.4 mm and length of 10 mm. Mini-implants were placed in the area of the attached gingiva between the second premolar and first molar teeth, 2 mm below the mucogingival junction of both sides of the maxilla. Each implant on the right side (G1, n = 20) of the maxilla was irradiated with a diode laser, and the implants on the opposite side (left, G2, n = 20) were a control group (without laser irradiation). The 635-nm laser parameters; dose: 10 J per point (20 J/cm2), time: 100 s per point, two points (irradiation on a buccal, and a palatal side of the alveolus/implant), the total energy per session 20 J. Laser application protocol: immediately and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 30 days after surgery. The total energy after all therapeutic sessions was 140 J. The implants’ stability was measured employing a Periotest device (Periotest Test Value—PTV) immediately and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, and 60 days after the insertion of the mini-implants. Results: We found significantly higher secondary stability, lower mean PTV (6.18 ± 5.30) and (1.51 ± 2.25), for self-drilling mini-implants (G1, test group) in contrast to the control, G2 group (9.17 ± 8.25) and (5.00 ± 3.24), after 30 (p = 0.0003) and 60 days (p = 0.0000). Moreover, the analysis of the mini-implants stability after 635-nm diode laser application revealed significant higher stability in comparison with none irradiated implants (G2 group) after 3 days. (p = 0.0000) There was no significant difference in pain level measured on the NRS-11 scale on both sides of the maxilla. (p = 0.3665) An important finding was that all inserted mini-implants survived during a two-month observation period. Conclusions: 635-nm diode laser at laser irradiation increases the secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Arslan ◽  
Serhat Köseoğlu ◽  
Ezgi Doğanay Yildiz ◽  
Taner Arabaci ◽  
Levent Savran ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Guelsoy ◽  
Kadir Durak ◽  
Adnan Kurt ◽  
Sacit Karamursel ◽  
Inci F. Cilesiz

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia M. Mariani ◽  
Elena Ercoli ◽  
Nicoletta Guzzi ◽  
Loretta Bongiovanni ◽  
Laura Bianco ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document