Can the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing flap reconstruction following soft tissue sarcoma resection?

2016 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Slump ◽  
Peter C. Ferguson ◽  
Jay S. Wunder ◽  
Anthony Griffin ◽  
Harald J. Hoekstra ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3683
Author(s):  
Prakash Dave ◽  
Krishna P. Kamisetty

Background: American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) risk calculator is a valuable tool exercised in the hospitals across the USA for predicting risk rates for 8 post-operative complications till the 30th post-operative day, taking into account 21 risk factors. Its applicability in the surgical practice in India has not been popular. This study explores, if this model is accurate in predicting risk of post-operative complications in surgical patients in India.  Methods: Retrospective study done on 368 patients who underwent elective and emergency surgical procedures in a medical college hospital. Demographic data, contemplated surgery, co-morbid factors entered into the risk calculator and predicted personal risk calculated and compared to average risk. Post-operative progress reports retrieved. Complications till 30th post op day compared with the predicted risk estimates. Brier score, sensitivity and specificity, PPV/NPV, z and p values calculated for the probabilistic, predictive values of the model for validation.Results: Emergency procedures done in 143 and elective in 225. 67 developed major, 35 minor, 11 fatal complications. The average Brier score was 0.00324. Mean sensitivity was 96.08 %, specificity 98.94%. Mean PPV 82.6%, NPV 99.6%. The predictions were inaccurate for serious, “any” complications, discharge to nursing and rehabilitative facility, the colectomy ileus and length of stay. The percentage of error ranged from 2.22 to 25.Conclusions: Overall, the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator very fairly predicted the complications till the 30th post-operative day which naturally matched with actual complications that were seen.


2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-002772
Author(s):  
Beryl Manning-Geist ◽  
Ann M Cathcart ◽  
Mackenzie W Sullivan ◽  
Andrea Pelletier ◽  
Stephanie Cham ◽  
...  

IntroductionIn gynecologic patients, few studies describe the accuracy of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) pre-operative risk calculator for women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.ObjectiveTo determine whether the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator accurately predicts post-operative complications and length of stay in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsFor this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study, pre-operative risk factors, post-operative complication rates, and Current Procedural Terminology codes were abstracted from records of patients with ovarian cancer managed with open interval debulking surgery from January 2010 to July 2015. A power calculation was done to estimate the minimum number of complications needed to evaluate the accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator. Predicted risk compared with observed risk was calculated using logistic regression. The predictive accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator in estimating post-operative complications or length of stay was assessed using c-statistics and Briar scores. Complications with a c-statistic of >0.70 and Brier score of <0.01 were considered to have high discriminative ability.ResultsA total of 261 patients underwent interval debulking surgery, encompassing 21 unique Current Procedural Terminology codes. Readmission (n=25), surgical site infection (n=35), urinary tract infection (n=12), and serious post-operative complications (n=57) met the minimum event threshold (n>10). All predicted complication rates fell within the IQR of the observed incidence rates. However, the ACS-NSQIP calculator demonstrated neither discriminative ability nor accuracy for any post-operative complications based on c-statistics and Brier scores. The calculator accurately predicted length of stay within 1 day for only 32% of patients and could not accurately predict which patients were likely to have a prolonged length of stay (c-statistic=0.65).ConclusionAmong patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, the ACS-NSQIP did not accurately discriminate which patients were at increased risk of complications or extended length of stay. The risk calculator should be considered to have limited utility in informing pre-operative counseling or surgical planning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Golden ◽  
Ashar Ata ◽  
Vinita Kusupati ◽  
Timothy Jenkel ◽  
Nidahs Khakoo ◽  
...  

The ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) is an evidence-based clinical tool commonly used for evaluating postoperative risk. The goal of this study was to validate SRC-predicted complications by comparing them with observed outcomes in the acute care surgical setting. In this study, pre- and postoperative data from 1693 acute care surgeries (hernia repair, enterolysis, intestinal incision/excision and enterectomy, gastrectomy, debridement, colectomy, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, gastrorrhaphy, and incision and drainage of soft tissue, breast abscesses, and removal of foreign bodies) performed at a Level I trauma center over a five-year time period were abstracted. Predictions for any and serious complications were based on SRC were compared with observed outcomes using various measures of diagnostic. When evaluated as one group, the SRC had good discriminative power for predicting any and serious complications after acute care surgeries (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.79, 0.81). In addition, the SRC met Brier score requirements for an informative model overall. However, the predictive accuracy of the SRC varied for various procedures within the acute care patient population. For serious complications, the diagnostic measures ranged from an AUC of 0.61 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.716 for incision & drainage soft tissue to AUC of 0.91 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.064 for gastrorrhaphy. Length of stay was significantly underestimated by the SRC overall (8.56 days, P < 0.01) and for individual procedures. The SRC performs well at predicting complications after acute care surgeries overall; however, there is great variability in performance between procedure types. Further refinements in risk stratification may improve SRC predictions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 818-824
Author(s):  
Sasha Vaziri ◽  
Joseph M. Abbatematteo ◽  
Max S. Fleisher ◽  
Alexander B. Dru ◽  
Dennis T. Lockney ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) online surgical risk calculator uses inherent patient characteristics to provide predictive risk scores for adverse postoperative events. The purpose of this study was to determine if predicted perioperative risk scores correlate with actual hospital costs.METHODSA single-center retrospective review of 1005 neurosurgical patients treated between September 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014, was performed. Individual patient characteristics were entered into the NSQIP calculator. Predicted risk scores were compared with actual in-hospital costs obtained from a billing database. Correlational statistics were used to determine if patients with higher risk scores were associated with increased in-hospital costs.RESULTSThe Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was used to assess the correlation between 11 types of predicted complication risk scores and 5 types of encounter costs from 1005 health encounters involving neurosurgical procedures. Risk scores in categories such as any complication, serious complication, pneumonia, cardiac complication, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, renal failure, return to operating room, death, and discharge to nursing home or rehabilitation facility were obtained. Patients with higher predicted risk scores in all measures except surgical site infection were found to have a statistically significant association with increased actual in-hospital costs (p < 0.0005).CONCLUSIONSPrevious work has demonstrated that the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator can accurately predict mortality after neurosurgery but is poorly predictive of other potential adverse events and clinical outcomes. However, this study demonstrates that predicted high-risk patients identified by the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator have a statistically significant moderate correlation to increased actual in-hospital costs. The NSQIP calculator may not accurately predict the occurrence of surgical complications (as demonstrated previously), but future iterations of the ACS universal risk calculator may be effective in predicting actual in-hospital costs, which could be advantageous in the current value-based healthcare environment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. S67
Author(s):  
H. Van der Hulst ◽  
J.W.T. Dekker ◽  
E. Bastiaannet ◽  
J. van der Bol ◽  
F. van den Bos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Neel P. Chudgar ◽  
Shi Yan ◽  
Meier Hsu ◽  
Kay See Tan ◽  
Katherine D. Gray ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Cusworth ◽  
Bradley A. Krasnick ◽  
Timothy M. Nywening ◽  
Cheryl A. Woolsey ◽  
Ryan C. Fields ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nyree Griffin ◽  
Jeremy Rabouhans ◽  
Lee A. Grant ◽  
Roy L. H. Ng ◽  
David Ross ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document