#ThisIsOurLane: Time for pediatric hematology/oncology providers to join gun violence prevention efforts

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen E. Ronca ◽  
Nancy A. Dodson ◽  
Daniel A. Weiser ◽  
Alyssa H. Silver
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (S4) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Hannah Abelow ◽  
Cassandra Crifasi ◽  
Daniel Webster

This article argues that state government actors concerned about gun violence prevention should prioritize enactment of robust firearm purchaser regimes at the state level. First, the article outlines the empirical evidence base for purchaser licensing. Then, the article describes how state governments can design this policy. Next, the article assesses the likelihood that purchaser licensing legislation will continue to be upheld by federal courts. Finally, the article addresses the implications of this policy, aimed at curbing gun deaths, for equally important racial justice priorities. Taken together, these various considerations indicate that purchaser licensing policies are among the most effective firearm-focused laws state governments can enact to reduce gun deaths within the existing federal legislative and legal frameworks.


The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10041) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Alcorn ◽  
Scott Burris

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee Dinnin Huff ◽  
Michelle Barnhart ◽  
Brandon McAlexander ◽  
Jim McAlexander

Building on work on social and macro-social marketing, we provide an empirical account of ways in which American gun violence prevention groups (GVPGs) act as macro-social marketers as they address the wicked problem of gun violence, which they define as deaths and injuries with firearms. We find that, as a collective, GVPGs attempt to change the culture related to guns by targeting up-, mid-, and downstream agents. We contribute to theory by (1) expanding the concept of macro-social marketing beyond government entities to include consumer interest groups and collectives; (2) introducing internal marketing as a macro-social marketing tool critical for macro-social marketers dependent largely on volunteers; (3) elucidating ways that macro-social marketers can accomplish upstream changes indirectly, by encouraging consumers and citizens to influence policy makers; and (4) revealing marketing tactics that can be leveraged across up-, mid-, downstream, and internal efforts.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2552-2552
Author(s):  
Majd T Ghanim ◽  
Jennifer H Voeks ◽  
Julie Kanter

Abstract Introduction/Background: There are no evidence-based guidelines for optimal transfusion practices for patients undergoing chemotherapy and stem cell transplant. There are minimal low-quality studies regarding transfusion thresholds as well as the efficacy of pre-transfusion medications (to reduce febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions) for these patients. To pursue a prospective quality improvement study, it is important to know the current transfusion standards used by practitioners regarding: 1) transfusion thresholds for platelets and red blood cells and 2) routine use of pre medications prior to transfusions. Additional research questions included differences in the above standards by region or by pediatrics vs. adult providers. Study Design and Methods: Expedited IRB approval was obtained. We conducted a REDCap survey from 3/1/18-4/12/18 targeting hematology oncology providers of both pediatric and adult providers. The survey was emailed through multiple databases with members form several countries that included both adult and pediatric hematology/oncology practitioners. Results: One hundred and nineteen hematology/oncology practitioners completed the survey: 94 attending physicians, 19 fellows and 6 nurse practitioners. Most respondents practiced in United States (90 %, 107/119), the rest practiced in Canada, India, Italy and Iran. The majority of participants were pediatric hematology/oncology providers (84 %, 100/119). Of the remaining providers 10 treated only adults and 9 treated both adults and children. The vast majority (97%, 115/119) of participants did not utilize a standard policy for premedication prior to red blood cell transfusions. Similarly, 95 % (111/117) or participants made individual decisions on premedication with platelet transfusions rather than using an institutional policy. When asked about the threshold to transfuse blood products, 71% (75/105) of those who treated patients undergoing chemotherapy said they would transfuse red blood cells when patients had a hemoglobin of</= 7 g/dL, and 79% (82/104) would transfuse platelets when patients had a platelet count <10 K/mL. Practitioners treating bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients had more variability and used higher transfusion thresholds. Fifty-two percent (33/64) of them would transfuse red blood cells for patients undergoing BMT with a higher threshold of hemoglobin of 8 g/dL while only 36% used the lower threshold of 7 g/dL. Similarly, for platelet transfusions for patients undergoing BMT, 47% (31/66) would use a 20K/mL threshold, and 45% would transfuse platelets at a threshold of 10 K/mL. Conclusion: There is currently no routine practice of utilizing pre-medications prior to transfusions of red blood cells or platelets. Instead, practitioners surveyed indicated a preference for individualizing the use of pre-medications only if patients had a previous transfusion reaction. As the use of these medications is not evidence-based, additional studies are needed to determine their efficacy. Transfusion thresholds are relatively consistent among providers with the majority aiming for more liberal thresholds in patients undergoing chemotherapy and more conservative for those undergoing BMT. More studies are needed to evaluate the risks and benefits of using different transfusion thresholds. Disclosures Kanter: Sancilio: Research Funding; ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document