A meta‐analysis of Tier 2 interventions implemented within School‐Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-161
Author(s):  
Kwang‐Sun Cho Blair ◽  
Eun‐Young Park ◽  
Won‐Ho Kim
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 2 Interventions

Optimal Timing for Launching Installation of Tier 2 and 3 Systems of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.

Examining Teaming and Tier 2 and 3 Practices Within a PBIS Framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072110510
Author(s):  
Rhonda N. T. Nese ◽  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Data Use ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Behavior Support ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Core Feature

One core feature of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) is a systems-level teaming process for coordinating staff implementation of evidence-based practices and monitoring student progress across all three tiers. Prior research has shown schools that report regular teaming and team-based data use are more likely to successfully adopt and sustain implementation of multi-tiered systems of behavior support. However, more research is currently needed to better understand the various teaming configurations, structures, and practices commonly used by PBIS teams in typical schools, particularly at advanced tiers. For the current study, members of school and district PBIS teams representing 718 schools were surveyed to better understand (a) teaming configurations and practices currently being used in schools implementing PBIS and (b) common interventions that PBIS teams report implementing at Tiers 2 and 3. Survey findings are discussed, along with implications of those results for future research and practice in applied settings.

The Effects of Tier 2 Mathematics Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 001440292096918
Author(s):  
Asha K. Jitendra ◽  
Ahmed Alghamdi ◽  
Rebecca Edmunds ◽  
Nicole M. McKevett ◽  
John Mouanoutoua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Variance Estimation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Mathematics Interventions ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Tier 2 Interventions ◽  
Mathematics Difficulties ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of supplemental Tier-2 mathematics interventions for students with mathematics difficulties (MD). We reviewed 39 experimental and quasi-experimental studies that included 40 independent samples, with 61 treatment groups. Utilizing robust variance estimation (RVE), results revealed a treatment effect of 0.41. Mixed-effects meta-regression analyses revealed that Tier-2 interventions were moderated by intervention model type, group size, and type of measure. We present recommendations for future research and implementation of mathematics practices.

Reducing Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Late Elementary School: A Comparison of Two Targeted Interventions

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara C. McDaniel ◽  
John E. Lochman ◽  
Sara Tomek ◽  
Nicole Powell ◽  
April Irwin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Externalizing Behavior ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Tier 2 Interventions ◽  
Coping Power ◽  
And Coping

Students with elevated levels of risk require targeted Tier 2 behavioral interventions that are efficient and effective to prevent the need for more intensive, special education supports. Although Tier 2 is a critical component of multi-tiered systems of support, a paucity of research exists regarding how best to provide evidence-based Tier 2 interventions, particularly for students with comorbid deficit areas. The current trial involved 33 third- through fifth-grade participants who were assigned to one of three study groups: (a) control, (b) check-in/check-out, or (c) Coping Power. The Behavior Assessment of Children in Schools–2 (BASC-2) was used to measure changes in externalizing behavior, along with its three component subscales. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was used to examine change in broad emotional and behavioral risk profiles. Teachers rated participants on the SDQ and BASC-2 at preintervention, postintervention, and follow-up. Results indicate that both check-in/check-out and Coping Power yielded decreases in externalizing behavior, with Coping Power also resulting in significant decreases in overall emotional and behavioral risk. A discussion of these results along with implications for future research and study limitations are presented.

The Growth of Effective Mental Health Services in Schools in the United States

Education ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Weist ◽  
David Riddle ◽  
Ashley Quell ◽  
Cameron Massey ◽  
Crystal McWhirter
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Mental Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Based Health Centers ◽  
Tier 3 ◽  
Systems Framework

This chapter provides a review of the movement toward more comprehensive mental health systems in schools through mental health-education system partnerships. We review factors contributing to the growth of this field including experiences in school nursing, school-based health centers, regulations regarding special education, and progressively expanding federal support. We then discuss integration of these expanded school mental health (SMH) programs with multitiered systems of support (MTSS) in schools, such as Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). Specifically, the Interconnected Systems Framework (ISF) for SMH and PBIS represents a platform for effective programs and services at Tier 1, involving promotion/prevention; Tier 2, involving early intervention; and Tier 3, more intensive intervention. Key strategies associated with the ISF and effective practices at each of these tiers are reviewed, including emphases on effective team and culturally responsive and evidence-based practices. The chapter concludes with a review of future directions for SMH.

Strategies for Including Students With Extensive Support Needs in SWPBIS

2021 ◽  
pp. 273247452110003
Author(s):  
Virginia L. Walker ◽  
Sheldon L. Loman
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Needs ◽  
Tier 1

Schools that implement School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) offer a multitiered continuum of supports that increases in intensity to support the behavioral needs of all students within a school. Although the number of schools that have adopted SWPBIS continues to rise, students with extensive support needs (ESN) may be excluded from various aspects of SWPBIS at the Tier 1 and Tier 2 levels. Given that SWPBIS is intended to be fully inclusive, the purpose of this article is to provide educators and other staff with practical tools and guidelines for including students with ESN in Tiers 1 and 2 of SWPBIS. We also present additional considerations for self-assessment, collaborative teaming, and professional development for including students with ESN in SWPBIS.

Multitiered Systems of Supports, Response to Intervention, and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Samantha Bates ◽  
LaShonda Linnen ◽  
Stephanie Columbia ◽  
Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Keyword(s):  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Students At Risk ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Based ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

This chapter covers the Response to Intervention framework, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, and multitiered systems of supports (MTSS). The Response to Intervention framework is a central step in implementing a successful MTSS framework. MTSS delivers school-based supports across three tiers: tier 1 (universal), tier 2 (targeted), and tier 3 (individualized). The MTSS framework is a resource that enables schools to use data not only to identify students at risk for poor learning outcomes but also to monitor student progress and deliver evidence-based interventions. The chapter provides examples of ways social workers can maximize the utility of these models and school teams to improve student outcomes.

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Schools: A Tutorial

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Keller-Bell ◽  
Maureen Short
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Systems ◽  
Language Therapy ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Expectations ◽  
Outcomes For Children

Purpose Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) provide a framework for behavioral expectations in school systems for children with and without disabilities. Speech-language pathologists who work in school settings should be familiar with this framework as part of their role in improving the outcomes for children. The purpose of this tutorial is to discuss PBIS and its use in school settings. Method The authors provide an overview of the PBIS framework and focus on its applicability in classroom-based settings. The process of implementing PBIS in classrooms and other settings such as speech-language therapy is discussed. Conclusions This tutorial provides speech-language pathologists with an overview of PBIS and may facilitate their understanding of how to implement PBIS in nonclassroom settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document