Mind-body medicine and lifestyle modification in supportive cancer care: A cohort study on a day care clinic program for cancer patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2127-2134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Jeitler ◽  
Jessica Jaspers ◽  
Christel von Scheidt ◽  
Barbara Koch ◽  
Andreas Michalsen ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2945-2955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustav Dobos ◽  
Tatiana Overhamm ◽  
Arndt Büssing ◽  
Thomas Ostermann ◽  
Jost Langhorst ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Lefebvre ◽  
Laura Tack ◽  
Virginie Blieck ◽  
Lieselot Cool ◽  
Hans Pottel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acupuncture provides a possible complementary therapy which can be used alongside or following cancer treatment to relieve side-effects for cancer patients and survivors, such as pain and depression. Equally, it can provide relief from symptoms such as anxiety and sleep disturbance, which are recognised as significant issues among caregivers of those with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability and preferences of cancer patients, disease survivors and their informal caregivers in relation to acupuncture.Methods: A questionnaire was developed to explore acceptability and preferences of cancer patients, disease survivors and their caregivers in relation to acupuncture, including motivations to use acupuncture, preferred symptoms to be addressed, and practical issues (location; cost).Results: A participation rate of 94.5% was obtained, with 116 participating patients and survivors, and 54 caregivers. Acceptability of acupuncture was around 1/3 for patients (34.5%; 40/116) and almost half for informal caregivers (48.0%; 26/54). In terms of preferences, the day care clinic was the favoured location for patients (52.5%; 21/40) to undergo acupuncture, while there was no specific preference on location observed for caregivers. A large number of patients indicated they would be willing to pay to receive the complementary therapy (60%; 24/40). Symptoms of fatigue, feeling listless, and pain were most often identified as complaints patients and survivors would use acupuncture for (60.0%, 57.5%, and 47.5% respectively). For informal caregivers, 48.0% (26/54) expressed an interest in using acupuncture for their pain, stress and sleeping difficulties.Conclusions: This study indicates that many cancer patients, disease survivors and informal caregivers would accept acupuncture as a complementary therapy. They could further identify many symptoms they felt this therapy could relieve. This openness to acupuncture, and expressed preferences provide the foundations for this complementary therapy to be incorporated into holistic and supportive cancer care, both for patients and those supporting them.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 324-328
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Watanabe ◽  
Miho Kojima ◽  
Yoshimi Okumura ◽  
Yuki Kato ◽  
Yuko Deguchi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Grace A. Hanvey ◽  
Adaixa Padron ◽  
Elizabeth L. Kacel ◽  
Chantel Ulfig ◽  
Deidre B. Pereira

40 Background: Despite reporting similar levels of willingness to participate in clinical trials, minority cancer patients remain underrepresented in research interventions. The purpose of this analysis was to examine participant age, race, and ethnicity as predictors of study interest, eligibility, enrollment decision, and attrition in an intervention providing supportive care for women with cancer. Methods: Patients from the UF&Shands Gynecologic Oncology Service (N = 568) were approached for recruitment to either a six-week cognitive-behavioral intervention for insomnia and pain or a psychoeducational control condition. These women were queried about their willingness to participate in the study, interest level, and reasons for declining participation if they did not wish to enroll in the trial. Among enrolled patients (N = 64), predictors of attrition were explored. Results: Of approached patients, 57.2% were older than age 60, 14.7% were non-White, and 3.2% were Hispanic. Chi-square analyses indicated that there were no significant differences in interest level by age [χ2(2,441) = 2.732, p = .255], race [χ2(2,439) = 2.019, p = .364], or ethnicity [χ2(2,431) = 3.242, p = .198]. Eligible minority patients were significantly more likely to enroll than were non-Hispanic Whites [χ2(1,364) = 4.125, p = .042], with Hispanic recruitment driving this difference (p = .011). Survival analyses demonstrated no differences in attrition hazard based on age (B = -.088, p = .825), race (B = .583, p = .275), or ethnicity (B = -19.518, p = .999) among enrolled patients. Conclusions: In our supportive cancer clinical trial (CCT), there were no significant differences in trial interest across racial and ethnic minority groups. In fact, Hispanics were more likely to enroll than non-Hispanics. Furthermore, neither race nor ethnicity was a significant predictor of trial attrition. Future investigation is needed to better understand racial and ethnic disparities in cancer research enrollment, motivators and barriers to participation in supportive cancer care trials, potential inconsistencies in accrual patterns among minority cancer patients, and best practices for enrolling and retaining diverse participants for supportive CCTs. Clinical trial information: NCT02609880.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17536-e17536
Author(s):  
Eytan Ben-Ami ◽  
Hadar Merom ◽  
Fabienne Sikron ◽  
Jessica Livneh ◽  
Siegal Sadetzki ◽  
...  

e17536 Background: Following advancement in the oncology field, increasing numbers of patients are receiving ambulatory active treatment for prolonged periods of time. Many of these patients suffer from additional comorbidities and require comprehensive medical care. We aimed to assess the perception of cancer patients regarding the role of the FP and the oncologist in their care during times of active cancer treatment. Methods: A survey was conducted among 265 consecutive chemotherapy-treated patients at the day care clinic of the Oncology Institute at Sheba Medical Center in Israel. Results: Median age was 60 years (range 22-86), 184 (69%) were woman and 147 (55%) were Israeli born. All patients belonged to one of four Israeli HMOs, 96% had a regular FP and 70% met with him during the prior month. While 78% of the patients evaluated that their FP had sufficient time to devote to them, only 32% and 27% thought their FP was trained to or wished to treat medical problems occurring while receiving chemotherapy. Yet, a majority of patients (76%) stated that involvement of the FP is important to them. Surprisingly, 85% perceived the oncologist as having enough time to devote to their care and 60% perceived him as being capable of dealing with non-oncological problems. However, only 30% stated that the oncologist communicates with the FP. Accordingly, 72% of the patients stated that in the case of an urgent problem they will turn first to the oncology institute and only 9% will turn to their FP. Indeed, 46% had unscheduled visits to the day care facilities during the prior month. Conclusions: Our data indicate lack communication between team members and inadequate medical training as major barriers for comprehensive medical care for chemotherapy-treated cancer patients. This may adversely affect medical care, decrease satisfaction among physicians and increase unnecessary workload. A change of the current situation requires collaboration between FPs and oncologists at the local and national levels and should include standardization of communication measures as well as implementation of required aspects in educational programs of both specialties.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Paul ◽  
Holger Cramer ◽  
Romy Lauche ◽  
Nils Altner ◽  
Jost Langhorst ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document