The Red Queen in a potato field: integrated pest management versus chemical dependency in Colorado potato beetle control

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Alyokhin ◽  
David Mota-Sanchez ◽  
Mitchell Baker ◽  
William E Snyder ◽  
Sandra Menasha ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
David Noetzle ◽  
Jennifer Miller

Abstract Continued failure of most insecticides for control of CPB in the Anoka Sand Plains growing area stimulated further comparisons of biologicals, inorganics, and synthetic materials for CPB management. Soils are sands at this location. Plots were established in an irrigated commercial potato field. The individual plot consisted of 4—25 ft rows with a row width of 3 ft. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design and were replicated 4 times. The grower treated all of the field, including the plots, with Thiodan and Asana XL at 1.0 lb and 0.5 lb Al/acre respectively on 8 Jul and 16 Jul. Plot treatments were applied on 25 Jun, 6 and 19 Jul using a CO2 hand sprayer with about 20 gals total material/acre and 40 psi pressure. Larval ratings and defoliation estimates were taken on 6 and 19 Jul. Vines were killed on 3 Aug and yields collected on 18 Aug. The center 2 rows of each plot were harvested for yield.


1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
David M. Noetzel ◽  
Jennifer Miller

Abstract A trial was established in an irrigated commercial potato field adjacent to a commercial planting of a NatureMark NewLeafⓇ field. Plots were 4-36 inch rows by 25’ in length. Treatments were arranged in a RCB and replicated 4 times. Treatments were applied on 8 & 26 June and 8 July using a CO2 hand held sprayer. Total material per acre was approximately 20 gal applied using 40 psi. CPB populations were very high at this site and late readings are confused by non-random feeding. Yields were not taken.


Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1181
Author(s):  
Renata Bažok ◽  
Jamie O’Keeffe ◽  
Ivana Jurada ◽  
Zrinka Drmić ◽  
Martina Kadoić Balaško ◽  
...  

Colorado potato beetle (CPB) is the most notorious and problematic insect defoliator pest of potato. It is well known for its ability to develop resistance to chemical insecticides, so novel treatment methods must be developed. A possible solution is the application of newer groups of insecticides (biotechnical and biological insecticides) which are more selective and to which resistance has not yet been recorded. This work investigated the use of ecologically acceptable insecticide treatments: azadirachtin, spinosad and spinetoram, and their combinations against CPB larvae in laboratory and field conditions. Reduced dosing and combinational treatments were used to determine if effective protection against CPB could be achieved while also improving economic results. Our results from laboratory trials showed that combinations of low-dose azadirachtin (25%) and low-dose spinetoram (5%) are suitable for use in CPB integrated pest management. The results of the field trial showed that the use of 50% reduced dosage of spinosad and spinetoram resulted in high efficacy (89–99%) and can be recommended as a treatment method that provides effective control of CPB, improved economic results, and a positive environmental impact. Based on the advantages that these treatments offer compared to chemical insecticides, further work is recommended to determine if these combinational treatments used in other dosages or in combinations with some other ecologically acceptable insecticides can provide satisfactory control of CPB.


1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-127
Author(s):  
Craig A. Longtine ◽  
David W. Ragsdale ◽  
Edward B. Radcliffe

Abstract This trial was located in a non-irrigated commercial potato field near Hollandale in southern Minnesota. Plots consisted of a single treatment row 25 ft in length bordered on each side by two untreated guard rows. Plant spacing was 36 inches between rows and 12 inches between plants within rows. Treatments were replicated four times in a completely randomized design. Treatments were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer fitted with a single Teejet 8003-E flat-fan nozzle delivering 40 gpa/acre at 35 psi. All treatments were applied on 2 Jul. Spraying conditions were windy, but winds were constant. In evaluating the treatments, direct counts of early instars (first and second) and late instars (third and fourth) were made on every plant in each plot on 3 Jul. The data were subjected to analyses of variance following log10(x +1) transformation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document