Assessing the impact of educational development through the lens of the scholarship of teaching and learning

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (122) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Hoessler ◽  
Judy Britnell ◽  
Denise Stockley
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Developing Faculty Communities of Practice to Expand the Use of Effective Pedagogical Techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Hoyert ◽  
Cynthia O'Dell
Keyword(s):  
Student Success ◽  
Communities Of Practice ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
First Year ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Pedagogical Techniques ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Faculty Group

The scholarship of teaching and learning literature is replete with examples of pedagogical techniques that have been demonstrated to be effective in improving learning, motivation, and student success. The extension of these techniques beyond the original context has tended to be slow, difficult, and incomplete. The following paper examines an intervention designed to encourage the exploration and use of a variety of pedagogical techniques by faculty in a traditional, four-year college faculty within the context of the AASCU Re-imagining the First Year Initiative. Small groups of six to eight faculty, joined and created communities of practice. The groups were known as Pedagogical Interest Groups, or PIGs for short. The faculty read about and analyzed a series of pedagogical techniques and committed to introducing at least one technique into their courses to further explore the techniques. When the techniques were successful, the faculty members redesigned entire classes to expand the impact. The communities of practice were successful in encouraging faculty to explore a wide variety of techniques. The average faculty group explored eight different pedagogical techniques. Faculty were able to use the opportunity to experiment with techniques with the support from their colleagues in their PIG. A dozen techniques were explored across the PIGs and dozens of class sections have been completely redesigned. To date, over 2000 students have experienced redesigned courses. Measures of student success, satisfaction, and interest in those sections have increased. The effort has been accompanied by a robust increase in the campus-wide retention rates. ​

Peer Assessment for Development of Preservice Teachers

2011 ◽  
pp. 263-280
Author(s):  
Lorraine Gilpin ◽  
Yasar Bodur ◽  
Kathleen Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Classroom Teaching ◽  
Teacher Education Programs ◽  
Peer Observation ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
The Impact

Peer assessment holds tremendous potential to positively impact the development of preservice teachers. The purpose of this chapter is to describe our findings on the impact of different forms of peer observation and feedback on preservice teachers’ skills in analyzing classroom teaching and their perceptions of their experience with peer assessment. In addition to reporting our findings, we draw from the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning literature to present peer assessment as a medium to overcome structured isolation that is present in the practice of teaching. According to our study, peer observation and feedback is beneficial to preservice teachers’ learning. However, to maximize its effectiveness, a culture of peer assessment should be established in teacher education programs.

Structures and Considerations for SoTL Educational Development

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-59
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Friberg ◽  
Lauren Scharff
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
Colleges And Universities ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
The World

Colleges and universities around the world share a broad focus on education. However, unique characteristics and priorities across institutions may lead to vastly different educational development opportunities for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and levels of impact for the SoTL efforts (e.g., micro, meso, macro, mega). This chapter is organized in two distinct parts. Part 1 examines five different structures typical for SoTL educational development with a focus on their organizational structure within the institution and the SoTL expertise of individuals who that lead these efforts. Strengths and limitations of each structure are presented. Part 2 provides a discussion of critical considerations that impact all SoTL educational development efforts regardless of the type of structure that exists within an institution.

scholarly journals 6: Toward a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Educational Development

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Felten ◽  
Alan Kalish ◽  
Allison Pingree ◽  
Kathryn M. Plank
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching

scholarly journals 29. Two Models for Introducing Graduate Students to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Natasha Patrito Hannon ◽  
Svitlana Taraban-Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Effective Teaching ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Graduate Student ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching

Graduate students aspiring to become faculty members should be provided with meaningful opportunities to explore the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) and to formulate questions about student learning and effective teaching. To this end, teaching and learning centres should incorporate SoTL-oriented components within the framework of educational development programs to prepare our future faculty. This article briefly reviews the emerging literature on graduate student engagement with SoTL and highlights two possible approaches for incorporating SoTL into educational development programs for graduate students.

scholarly journals The 4M framework as analytic lens for SoTL’s impact: A study of seven scholars

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-90
Author(s):  
Nicola Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Motivation Theory ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Four Levels ◽  
Postsecondary Teaching ◽  
The Impact

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) encompasses research on postsecondary teaching and learning across all disciplines. Why do scholars engage in the study of teaching and learning? What supports and challenges do they encounter? What is the impact of SoTL? Using a micro-meso-macro-mega (4M) framework, I explore these questions in interviews with seven SoTL scholars from various disciplines in one institution. Primarily, this article provides a case study illustration of the use of the micro-meso-macro-mega framework to explore SoTL. In addition to exploring participants’ reflections vis-à-vis the four levels, I reflect on possible connections to motivation theory as a lens for themes arising from the participants’ accounts of supports and barriers and the impact of their SoTL work.

scholarly journals Theory as a verb: working with dilemmas in educational development

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Lynn Coleman ◽  
Lucia Thesen
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Meaning Making ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
The South ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Creative Commons

In this reflective piece, Lynn Coleman and Lucia Thesen explore dilemmas of practice and theory in light of the contested nature of knowledge and meaning-making in educational development. How to cite this reflective piece: COLEMAN, Lynn; THESEN; Lucia. Reflective piece: theory as a verb: working with dilemmas in educational development. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, v. 2, n. 1, p. 129-135, Apr. 2018. Available at: http://sotl-south-journal.net/?journal=sotls&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=53   This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  

scholarly journals Enhancing the Emotional Intelligence of Students: Helping the Critical Few

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Instructional Methods ◽  
Hospitality Management ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Social Competencies ◽  
The Impact

Research has shown that students’ emotional intelligence (EI) can be enhanced with time intensive instructional methods other studies are inconclusive. I looked at the impact of including short EI lessons in an introductory hospitality management class. Results show that students who started with low EI increased their scores significantly; however, those with medium and high EI did not. More intensive EI lessons may be needed for those who start with higher levels of EI. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) reflections were used and the results of the current study were also compared to other similar studies to identify EI teaching methods among faculty in other disciplines. My recommendations are included for those who want to incorporate EI lessons into their classes to enhance students’ emotional and social competencies.

scholarly journals Chasing impact: The tale of three SoTL studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-107
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Pechenkina
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Innovative Teaching ◽  
What Works ◽  
Shared Goal ◽  
The Impact

This article queries the notion of impact in studies of teaching and learning located within the field of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). Grounded in literature focused on measuring and challenging the impact in SoTL, and primarily on the “what works” question, the author proposes a rubric by which to judge various levels and dimensions of impact achieved in SoTL-focused projects. To operationalize it, the rubric is applied to three completed projects, which while differing in their initial scope and intended outputs were united by a shared goal of improving learning by the means of innovative teaching. By using the rubric to analyze these projects’ outputs, strengths and weaknesses of each project’s design and evaluation methodology are revealed. Diverse levels and dimensions of impact are identified and discussed. The author invites scholars of teaching and learning to use, test, and critique the rubric in the context of their completed or in-progress studies.

scholarly journals Drawing on the Principles of SoTL to Illuminate a Path Forward for the Scholarship of Educational Development

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Kenny ◽  
Celia Popovic ◽  
Jill McSweeney ◽  
Kris Knorr ◽  
Carolyn Hoessler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reflective Practice ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Educational Development ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Seven Principles ◽  
The Individual

There has been growing discourse related to the importance of the scholarship of educational development (SoED), but less discussion related to clearly defining principles for guiding engagement in SoED or contextualizing SoED within literature related to the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). Expanding upon Felten’s (2013) principles for SoTL, as well as evolving discourse related to principles of educational development (e.g., Gibbs, 2013; Taylor & Rege Colet, 2010; Timmermans, 2014), this paper presents seven principles for SoED. Two additional principles (transforming practice and reflective practice) are added to Felten’s principles to further contextualize SoED in relation to educational development and SoTL. Three cases are provided to illustrate educational development, SoTL, and SoED within the context of these principles. The interrelationships between educational development, SoTL, and SoED are complex. While SoED offers many opportunities for further legitimizing the individual and collective practices in educational development, it also presents many additional tensions and questions for further research. On parle de plus en plus de l’importance de l’avancement des connaissances en pédagogie (ACP), mais on parle moins d’une définition claire des principes qui guident l’engagement en ACP ou de la contextualisation de l’ACP dans les publications de la recherche consacrée à l’avancement des connaissances en enseignement et en apprentissage (ACEA). Pour élargir la portée des principes pour l’ACEA présentés par Felten (2013), ainsi que celle du discours évolutif lié aux principes de la pédagogie (voir Gibbs, 2013; Taylor & Rege Colet, 2010; Timmermans, 2014), cet article présente sept principes pour l’ACP. Deux principes supplémentaires (transformation de la pratique et pratique réflective) sont ajoutés aux principes de Felten afin de contextualiser davantage l’ACP par rapport à la pédagogie et à l’ACEA. Trois cas sont présentés pour illustrer la pédagogie, l’ACEA et l’ACP dans le contexte de ces principes. Les relations entre la pédagogie, l’ACEA et l’ACP sont complexes. Alors que l’ACP offre de nombreuses possibilités pour rendre plus légitimes les pratiques individuelles et collectives en pédagogie, il présente également de nombreuses tensions et des questions supplémentaires qui pourront faire l’objet de davantage de recherche.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document