The Knowledge Problem, Entrepreneurial Discovery, and Austrian Market Process Theory

2000 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Yates
Author(s):  
Paul Dragos Aligica

This chapter starts with a brief comparative overview of the distinctive theoretical core of market process theory, preparing the way for a systematic presentation of what the capitalist market system looks like when framed through theoretical lenses shaped by a process view. Noting that such an approach has analytical, explanatory, and normative implications, the chapter focuses on the normative aspects. Its objective is twofold: first, to show how descriptive and analytical process theory requires and transmutes into a specific form of normative process theory and, second, to identify the convergence points with the existing relevant literatures, themes, and theoretical perspectives that are (or should be) part of the conceptual and logical elaboration of this normative political economy framework.


Author(s):  
Mark Packard

In this paper, we reconsider the various states of rest within Austrian market process theory. While this theory certainly embodies a superior representation of market processes to the neoclassical general equilibrium theory, it falls short of producing a holistic theory of human action. The analysis left out those human actions that produce changes to the so-called ‘final state of rest,’ which have so far been taken as exogenous to the market process. These exogenous shocks include knowledge generation and preference shifting. However, I argue that these can and ought to be understood as market phenomena, and so belong within the scope of praxeological analysis. To capture these types of human action, I propose that a new and truly ‘final’ state of rest be introduced, which we term the ‘nirvana state of rest.’ This new state represents a ‘true’ final state, in which human action ceases because all needs, and thus all motivation to act, are completely and perpetually assuaged. Introducing this state into the analysis, we can break free from myopic analyses of mere present states of knowledge and values to observe and explain general tendencies in market processes, prices, and entrepreneurship. I also show how quarrels within Austrian circles might be resolved through this expanded, macroscopic lens. 


Author(s):  
N. J. Saam ◽  
W. Kerber

This simulation model is an example of theory-driven modeling that aims at developing new hypotheses on mechanisms that work in markets. The central aim is to model processes of knowledge accumulation in markets on the theoretical basis of Hayek’s concept of “competition as a discovery procedure,” in which firms experiment with innovations that are tested in the market, and the superior innovations are imitated by other firms through mutual learning. After an overview on the structure of these simulation models and important results of previous research, we focus on the analysis of the severe negative effects that limited imitability has for this Hayekian process of knowledge accumulation. We show that limited imitability can hamper this process through the emergence of a certain kinds of lock-in situations which reduces the number of changes in the position of the leading firm.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 390-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Packard

The so-called autistic economy (here autarkic)—the economy of one—has been employed by Austrian theorists as a useful analytic baseline on which to build catallactic (market process) theory, which has included a theory of entrepreneurship. But so far, the autarkic economy has been examined almost exclusively in this way. In this article it is argued that the autarkic economy must brought forward in our theorizing to be understood not as a mere analytic tool, but as a real and significant aspect of praxeology. It is proposed that catallaxy and autarky be understood as substitutes, complements, and even competitors. Extending Austrian theorizing of the autarkic economy, the entrepreneurial function within autarkic economies is examined and elaborated. It is shown that, far from only a catallactic role, the entrepreneurial function is prominent within the autarkic economy also, in which the entrepreneur plays a significant role in augmenting individual lifestyles and, thus, total economic development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document