Water-retaining Structures and Retaining Walls

1990 ◽  
pp. 296-328
Author(s):  
W. H. Mosley ◽  
J. H. Bungey
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Retaining Structures

Water-retaining Structures and Retaining Walls

1982 ◽  
pp. 287-317
Author(s):  
W. H. Mosley ◽  
J. H. Bungey
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Retaining Structures

Water-retaining Structures and Retaining Walls

1976 ◽  
pp. 277-303
Author(s):  
W. H. Mosley ◽  
J. H. Bungey
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Retaining Structures

Seismic Performance of Earth Structures during the February 2010 Maule, Chile, Earthquake: Dams, Levees, Tailings Dams, and Retaining Walls

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1_suppl1) ◽  
pp. 75-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Verdugo ◽  
Nicholas Sitar ◽  
J. David Frost ◽  
Jonathan D. Bray ◽  
Gabriel Candia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Mine Tailings ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Earth Dams ◽  
Slope Failures ◽  
Retaining Structures ◽  
Ground Movements ◽  
Tailings Dams ◽  
Earth Structures ◽  
Chile Earthquake

The 27 February 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake occurred during the driest time of the year, which implied that most of the soils in the slopes were not saturated and that the dams had extra freeboard. This may explain the small number of slope failures caused by the earthquake. However, two important earth dams suffered seismically induced permanent ground movements, but no catastrophic damage was reported because the reservoirs levels were low. Five medium-sized mine tailings dams failed due to liquefaction; one of them tragically caused four casualties. Retaining structures of all types performed well and no failures were observed.

The pressure of clay backfill against retaining structures

1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. I. Clayton ◽  
I. F. Symons ◽  
J. C. Hiedra-Cobo
Keyword(s):  
Moisture Content ◽  
Stress Reduction ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
High Plasticity ◽  
Retaining Structures ◽  
Constant Moisture Content ◽  
Pressure Changes

This paper investigates the pressures exerted by clay backfills against retaining structures. The lateral pressures are developed during three main phases: placement, compaction, and burial; horizontal total stress reduction at constant moisture content; and swelling or consolidation under approximately constant vertical stress. Experimental data from laboratory and pilot-scale studies, using clays of intermediate and high plasticity, are presented and used to assess the magnitude of the pressure changes in each phase. The process of compaction is examined and it is concluded that previously developed theories for assessing the pressures on retaining walls developed by compaction of granular soils are inapplicable for cohesive soils. The factors controlling the swelling of cohesive backfill are reviewed and results from a preliminary numerical study are used to provide an indication of the likely effects of plasticity and placement moisture content. Key words: earth pressure, retaining walls, clay, compaction, swelling.

Experimental Testing of Retaining Walls of Precast Elements

2015 ◽  
Vol 725-726 ◽  
pp. 168-175
Author(s):  
Zoran Bonić ◽  
Nebojša Davidović ◽  
Verka Prolović ◽  
Nikola Romić ◽  
Nikolay Vatin
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Testing ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Dynamic Loads ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Mechanically Stabilized Earth ◽  
Static Loads ◽  
Retaining Structures ◽  
Mechanically Stabilized ◽  
Precast Elements ◽  
Construction Practice

In contemporary construction practice is increasingly being applied flexible retaining structures of mechanically stabilized earth, gabions and precast elements. Although widely used only recently, their benefits are proven and widely accepted. The first part of the paper provides an overview of the possible ways of using of precast elements in the construction of retaining walls. The second part gives a detailed overview of the experimental testing of stability of retaining walls of prefabricated betonblok elements. The effect of static loads on the wall was examined in the first, and the effect of the dynamic loads in the second experiment. The results are analyzed and recommendations for future research are given.

scholarly journals Analisa Perhitungan Dimensi Turap Kayu (Panjang Kayu Ditanam Dan Tebal) Sebagai Dinding Penahan Tanah Sementara

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1057
Author(s):  
Ellyta Mona
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Steel Sheet ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Sheet Pile ◽  
Wood Material ◽  
Retaining Structures ◽  
And Function ◽  
Pile Length

At this time, the development of retaining structures continues to be optimized according to the available land use, to deal with current and future landslides. The structure of the retaining wall (Turap) is expected to provide a solution for the handling. Based on the type of material used, several types of sheet pile are known, namely; wood sheet pile, concrete sheet pile and steel sheet pile, and based on the type of construction there are two types, namely; cantilever type and anchor type. Sheet pile made of wood, the function of this material is to retain the soil which is not so high. This is because the wood material will not be able to withstand excessive soil or gravel loads. In a handling, knowing the function or planning for handling avalanches is very important, because by knowing the purpose and function of the plan, it can be easier in the design and planning process. Calculations for the quality and efficiency of handling can be achieved as desired. The purpose of this study was to analyze the planning calculation of the dimensions of the temporary wood sheet pile (length of planted wood and thickness) as a soil barrier that was built to prevent landslides caused by the intensity of rain. From the results of the research that has been carried out, the planning of wooden sheet piles with a width of 1 meter and 2 meters as retaining walls and for soil volume ranges from 20 KN/M3-30 KN/M3 while the height of sheet piles is 1 meter - 4 meters. It was found that the length of the sheet pile planted did not affect changes in the volume of the soil while the thickness of the wood did.

Water-retaining Structures and Retaining Walls

1990 ◽  
pp. 296-328
Author(s):  
W. H. Mosley ◽  
J. H. Bungey
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Retaining Structures

Water-retaining Structures and Retaining Walls

1987 ◽  
pp. 296-326
Author(s):  
W. H. Mosley ◽  
J. H. Bungey
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Retaining Structures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document