Stem Cell and Neuron Co-cultures for the Study of Nerve Regeneration

Author(s):  
Paul J. Kingham ◽  
Cristina Mantovani ◽  
Giorgio Terenghi
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 6606-6615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Hao Hsu ◽  
Wen-Chun Kuo ◽  
Yu-Tzu Chen ◽  
Chen-Tung Yen ◽  
Ying-Fang Chen ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1030-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen W. P. Kemp ◽  
Sarah K. Walsh ◽  
Rajiv Midha

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saami Khalifian ◽  
Karim A. Sarhane ◽  
Markus Tammia ◽  
Zuhaib Ibrahim ◽  
Hai-Quan Mao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohaina Che Man ◽  
Nadiah Sulaiman ◽  
Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus ◽  
Shahrul Hisham Zainal Ariffin ◽  
Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab ◽  
...  

Cell-free treatment is emerging as an alternative to cell delivery to promote endogenous regeneration using cell-derived factors. The purpose of this article was to systematically review studies of the effects of the dental stem cell secretome on nerve regeneration. PubMed and Scopus databases were used where searched and related studies were selected. The primary search identified 36 articles with the utilized keywords; however, only 13 articles met the defined inclusion criteria. Eight out of thirteen articles included in vivo and in vitro studies. We classified the dental stem cell-derived secretome with its nerve regeneration potential. All studies demonstrated that dental stem cell-derived factors promote neurotrophic effects that can mechanistically stimulate nerve regeneration in neurodegenerative diseases and nerve injury. This data collection will enable researchers to gather information to create a precise formulation for future prescribed treatments.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0180427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Hackelberg ◽  
Samuel J. Tuck ◽  
Long He ◽  
Arjun Rastogi ◽  
Christina White ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e2953
Author(s):  
Riccardo Schweizer ◽  
Jonas T. Schnider ◽  
Paolo M. Fanzio ◽  
Wakako Tsuji ◽  
Nataliya Kostereva ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moataz Dowaidar

In the U.S., peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) harm about 22 million people. The most frequent causes and types of PNI vary by demography (civilians vs. military, geography/country). After crush injuries, functional recovery is better than after transections, and better after distal injuries than proximal ones. Despite advancements in microsurgical treatments, severe PNIs remain connected to slow recovery. This review highlights new peripheral nerve regeneration approaches (e.g. electrical stimulation, cell therapies), which may lead to a shift in PNI therapeutic paradigms in conjunction with neurotrophic agents and breakthroughs in bioscaffold engineering. It also examines how synthetic neural scaffolds can aid with peripheral nerve recovery, as well as the next generation of biomimetic neural scaffolding that can aid in tissue regeneration. Neurotrophic factor-enriched neural scaffolds, stem cell treatments, and electrical stimulation have shown promising preclinical and even clinical results. The future of peripheral nerve regeneration is bright, since a combination of the aforementioned treatments may have a synergistic impact on nerve regeneration and functional recovery in patients with PNI. Stem cell technology is improving and evolving, and it has been explored through a number of methods in preclinical research for peripheral nerve regeneration. Electrical stimulation is another interesting potential treatment for PNI that may be used to stimulate axon regeneration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document