The School: A Setting for Evidence-Based Prevention Interventions and Policies

Author(s):  
Zili Sloboda ◽  
Christopher L. Ringwalt
Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessa Ryan ◽  
Vida Rebello ◽  
Desiree Gutierrez ◽  
Kameko Washburn ◽  
Alvaro Zevallos Barboza ◽  
...  

Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death globally and an increasing concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where, due to limited capacity to treat stroke, preventative efforts are critically important. Although some research on evidence-based interventions for stroke prevention in LMIC exists, there remains a significant gap in understanding of their implementation across various contexts in LMIC. Objectives: In this scoping review, our objective was to identify and synthesize the implementation outcomes (using Proctor et al.’s taxonomy, 2011) for stroke prevention interventions, as well as to describe the diverse interventions employed. Methods: Eligible studies were empirical, focused on implementation of stroke prevention programs or policies, and occurred in at least one LMIC. Five databases were searched, including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for selection and charted data; discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer until consensus was reached. Narrative synthesis was used to analyze and interpret the findings. Results: Studies were predominantly focused in Asia, targeting primary or secondary prevention, and facility-based. Interventions were conducted at the level of individual (n=11), system (n=12), or both (n=4). Various implementation outcomes were reported, most commonly cost (n=10), acceptability (n=7), fidelity (n=7), and feasibility (n=6), but also adoption (n=4), penetration (n=3), appropriateness (n=1), and sustainability (n=1). Conclusions: Findings highlight the breadth of evidence-based interventions for stroke prevention available to implement in LMIC settings, including culturally acceptable education interventions, cost-effective medications, and community-based interventions implemented by community health workers. Implementation outcomes remain under-reported, and more rigorous research is needed to better plan and evaluate the implementation of these interventions to prevent stroke.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Arwidson ◽  
C Verry-Jolive

Abstract The majority of health promotion and disease prevention interventions implemented in both targeted and general populations have unknown effectiveness. This contrasts with drug treatments which must be proven effective before they can be prescribed. The recent evaluation of four addiction prevention interventions chosen by public health implementers showed that two had positive impacts on addiction prevention and two had deleterious effects. Despite over 50 years’ worth of scientific literature on the evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention programmes, it is little known and little used by project promoters. These promoters cannot be blamed for not using this literature as it is often difficult to access, to read and to understand. Even if they successfully access and read the articles, interventions are often not described properly, rendering the text useless for implementers. It is therefore necessary to create interfaces that translate this literature into a form useful for funders and project promoters. As a result, Public Health France has studied existing portals in both the United States and in Europe. An independent double-reviewing process comparable to the review process used by scientific journals for manuscripts as in the Norwegian portal was chosen for this reason.An expert committee has worked during more than one year to design and test a scoring grid that will be published soon. The 80+ programme evaluations found in the scientific literature will now be reviewed with the approved grid. Public Health France has also begun visiting each region in France to present the portal to local health authorities and NGOs to enable project promoters to submit their programmes soon and to promote the use of evidence-based or research-based programmes when possible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Schröder ◽  
B Babitsch ◽  
H Hassel

Abstract Background Studies have shown that interventions to prevent excess weight gain in children and teenagers are often planned unsystematically and not evidence-based. Planning high-quality interventions to prevent childhood obesity is a complex process requiring time and personnel, both limited resources in health promotion. The aim of this project is to develop an evidence-based, user-oriented planning tool to support and optimize the planning process of interventions to prevent excess weight gain in children and teenagers. Methods To identify existing tools for planning interventions, a systematic literature review (SLR) was first conducted in the databases PubMed, LIVIVO and Cochrane. In addition, seven interviews were carried out with practitioners in schools and communities to determine difficulties encountered during the planning process. This data served as the foundation for the design of an initial draft of the planning tool, which was subsequently tested in focus group discussions (FGD) with potential users. Results The SLR identified a total of 23 planning tools. Of these, four comprehensive and evidence-based ones were chosen to compare planning steps and context requirements. The interviews revealed that practitioners require support with problem and needs analysis, target setting and the development of theory-based strategies. The first planning step of the tool was tested in FGD and modified in response to group feedback. An optimized version of the tool can be presented. Future work will focus on converting the tool into a web-based application and pretesting it in schools and communities. Conclusions The planning tool will support the systematic development of evidence-based prevention interventions. It provides a comprehensive roadmap to the planning process, guiding the user step by step. The conversion into a web-based application will simplify and support these planning steps. This project is supported by the Federal Ministry of Health, Germany. Key messages The tool enables time-saving, structured and quality-assured planning of prevention interventions. Requirements resulting from practice were considered in the development of the planning tool.


Author(s):  
Matthew Chinman ◽  
Joie Acosta ◽  
Patricia Ebener ◽  
Sarah Hunter ◽  
Pamela Imm ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Faggiano ◽  
E Allara ◽  
F Giannotta ◽  
R Molinar ◽  
H Sumnall ◽  
...  

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e1001740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Faggiano ◽  
Elias Allara ◽  
Fabrizia Giannotta ◽  
Roberta Molinar ◽  
Harry Sumnall ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Zubkoff ◽  
Julia Neily ◽  
Shantia McCoy-Jones ◽  
Christina Soncrant ◽  
Yinong Young-Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document