Sustainable Development, Social Ecology, and the Quintuple Helix

2018 ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias G. Carayannis ◽  
David F. J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Quintuple Helix

Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?

2012 ◽  
pp. 535-565
Author(s):  
Elias Carayannis ◽  
David F.J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Knowledge Innovation ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Helix Structure

This article develops an inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary framework of analysis that relates knowledge, innovation and the environment (natural environments) to each other. For that purpose the five-helix structure model of the Quintuple Helix is being introduced. The Triple Helix model, designed by Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000), focuses on the relations of universities, industry and governments. The Quadruple Helix (Carayannis & Campbell, 2009) blends in the perspective of a media-based and culture-based public. The Quintuple Helix finally frames knowledge and innovation in the context of the environment (natural environments). Therefore, the Quintuple Helix can be interpreted as an approach in line with sustainable development and social ecology. “Eco-innovation” and “eco-entrepreneurship” should be processed in such a broader understanding of knowledge and innovation.

Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate to Each Other?

2012 ◽  
pp. 29-59
Author(s):  
Elias Carayannis ◽  
David F.J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Knowledge Innovation ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Helix Structure

This article develops an inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary framework of analysis that relates knowledge, innovation and the environment (natural environments) to each other. For that purpose the five-helix structure model of the Quintuple Helix is being introduced. The Triple Helix model, designed by Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000), focuses on the relations of universities, industry and governments. The Quadruple Helix (Carayannis & Campbell, 2009) blends in the perspective of a media-based and culture-based public. The Quintuple Helix finally frames knowledge and innovation in the context of the environment (natural environments). Therefore, the Quintuple Helix can be interpreted as an approach in line with sustainable development and social ecology. “Eco-innovation” and “eco-entrepreneurship” should be processed in such a broader understanding of knowledge and innovation.

Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias G. Carayannis ◽  
David F.J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Knowledge Innovation ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Helix Structure

This article develops an inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary framework of analysis that relates knowledge, innovation and the environment (natural environments) to each other. For that purpose the five-helix structure model of the Quintuple Helix is being introduced. The Triple Helix model, designed by Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000), focuses on the relations of universities, industry and governments. The Quadruple Helix (Carayannis & Campbell, 2009) blends in the perspective of a media-based and culture-based public. The Quintuple Helix finally frames knowledge and innovation in the context of the environment (natural environments). Therefore, the Quintuple Helix can be interpreted as an approach in line with sustainable development and social ecology. “Eco-innovation” and “eco-entrepreneurship” should be processed in such a broader understanding of knowledge and innovation.

scholarly journals The Collapse of Venezuela vs. The Sustainable Development of Selected South American Countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iván De la Vega ◽  
José Manuel Puente ◽  
Magaly Sanchez R
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
South American ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Innovation Model ◽  
Hugo Chavez ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the study is to examine the longitudinal trajectories of five selected South American countries in the period between 1990 and 2018, applying the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM). The aim is to analyse the trends of each country through the relationship of its helices using indicators extracted from an international database in order to establish their articulation and synergies to go in search of sustainable development. Within this dynamic, Venezuela represents the axis country of the study and Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Peru make up the group that allows the comparison. The research focuses attention on two periods of Venezuelan politics since they allow measuring the variations of the countries under study. The base year is 1996 and is called the pre-Hugo Chávez Frias (HCF) period; the cutoff year for the comparison is 2014 and is called the post-HCF period. The study is longitudinal and descriptive. For the analysis, the five knowledge subsystems (helices) of the QHIM were redefined in order to have precise concepts; a database was designed based on World Bank indicators that were later thematically related to each of the helices. The interrelationships between the helices of each country were also specified in order to determine which were the weakest and which had the most positive or negative influence. In order to calculate the percentage variation of the countries, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method was applied. In this sense, the most relevant finding is related to the decisions made in the last twenty years from the political helix in Venezuela because it deactivated and disarticulated the others, causing that country to collapse.

Selling Sustainable Development and Shortchanging Social Ecology in Costa Rican Forest Policy

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 93-127
Author(s):  
Eduardo Silva
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Renewable Resources ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Forest Policy ◽  
Costa Rican ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Social Equality ◽  
Grassroots Development ◽  
Environmental Initiatives ◽  
The Social

Abstract Costa Ricans have worked hard to weave the norms and principles of sustainable development into their nation's environmental policies, especially with respect to natural renewable resources, such as the forest. As a result, the nation is known as a leader in innovative environmental initiatives. But sustainable development is a complex, evolving concept. This paper analyzes how the emphasis on biodiversity conservation during the 1990s and early 2000s has, rhetoric notwithstanding, neglected the social equality, or livelihood, component of sustainable development. This trend stands in sharp contrast to earlier periods, when decisionmakers crafted policies and institutions that supported social ecology. The article concludes with a few observations on building political will to revive the grassroots development component of sustainable development.

scholarly journals Towards sustainable development in a transition economy: The case of eco-industrial parks in Ukraine

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-164
Author(s):  
Mykola Petrushenko ◽  
Borys Burkynskyi ◽  
Hanna Shevchenko ◽  
Yevhen Baranchenko
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Transition Economy ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Knowledge Innovation ◽  
Industrial Parks ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Economic Transformations ◽  
Exogenous Factors ◽  
Innovation Space ◽  
Model Scenarios

Sustainable development for transition economies is an opportunity to accelerate and complete socio-economic transformations and at the same time an additional responsibility in situations of instability and uncertainty. The chances for strengthening sustainability are growing within the organized innovation space, which makes it possible to model scenarios of ecologically oriented development and, with the help of state and international support, to start their implementation. The paper aims to analyze the possibilities and directions of creating eco-industrial parks in a transition economy. It uses an innovative helix model in its triple, quadruple and quintuple variations for functioning and sustainable development of industrial parks in Ukraine.The study adopts a descriptive comparative analysis of data on the planning and implementation of economic, primarily environmentally relevant, activities. Based on the analysis and description of exogenous factors, in particular within GEIPP, a SWOT table on the potential of eco-industrial parks was formed. The directions of development of industrial, technological, and scientific parks in Ukraine are determined using the quintuple helix model on the plane of “knowledge-innovation”, in particular on quadruple helix transition to sustainability through the simultaneous development of socially oriented and environmental activities. Within the legislation, it is proposed to approve a sustainable form of artificially separated innovation parks, namely the “eco-industrial park”. One of the conditions for advanced sustainable development in Ukraine is the creation of a national program to support the transformation of innovation parks into their environmental versions 2.0 and 3.0, as well as investing in greenfield eco-industrial parks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document