Multidimensional Mapping and Spatial Communication Through the Virtual Umwelt

Author(s):  
Trevor M. Harris
Author(s):  
Steven M. Weisberg ◽  
Anjan Chatterjee

Abstract Background Reference frames ground spatial communication by mapping ambiguous language (for example, navigation: “to the left”) to properties of the speaker (using a Relative reference frame: “to my left”) or the world (Absolute reference frame: “to the north”). People’s preferences for reference frame vary depending on factors like their culture, the specific task in which they are engaged, and differences among individuals. Although most people are proficient with both reference frames, it is unknown whether preference for reference frames is stable within people or varies based on the specific spatial domain. These alternatives are difficult to adjudicate because navigation is one of few spatial domains that can be naturally solved using multiple reference frames. That is, while spatial navigation directions can be specified using Absolute or Relative reference frames (“go north” vs “go left”), other spatial domains predominantly use Relative reference frames. Here, we used two domains to test the stability of reference frame preference: one based on navigating a four-way intersection; and the other based on the sport of ultimate frisbee. We recruited 58 ultimate frisbee players to complete an online experiment. We measured reaction time and accuracy while participants solved spatial problems in each domain using verbal prompts containing either Relative or Absolute reference frames. Details of the task in both domains were kept as similar as possible while remaining ecologically plausible so that reference frame preference could emerge. Results We pre-registered a prediction that participants would be faster using their preferred reference frame type and that this advantage would correlate across domains; we did not find such a correlation. Instead, the data reveal that people use distinct reference frames in each domain. Conclusion This experiment reveals that spatial reference frame types are not stable and may be differentially suited to specific domains. This finding has broad implications for communicating spatial information by offering an important consideration for how spatial reference frames are used in communication: task constraints may affect reference frame choice as much as individual factors or culture.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164
Author(s):  
Miguel Gally

ABSTRACTReflections on the foundations and development of a tradition in Brazilian visual arts: the materialization of a non discursive spatial communication through some artworks from Hélio Oiticica (1937-1980), Ernesto Neto (1964-), and Maurício Panella (1973-).RESUMOReflexões sobre os fundamentos e desenvolvimento de uma tradição nas artes visuais brasileira: a materialização de uma comunicação espacial não discursiva a partir de algumas obras de Hélio Oiticica (1937-1980), Ernesto Neto (1964-) e Maurício Panella (1973-).


Author(s):  
Stacey Cunningham ◽  
Caroline G.L. Cao

Author(s):  
Stacey Cunningham ◽  
Amine Chellali ◽  
Jose Banez ◽  
Caroline G. L. Cao

Robots are increasingly being incorporated into the clinical environment. In minimally invasive surgery, robots are used to hold the tools and camera at the operating table while the surgeon performs surgery at a console away from the rest of the surgical team, reducing the opportunity for face-to-face communication. As surgery is a team-oriented process in which surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists collaborate to achieve the common goal of delivering care to a patient, any barrier to communication can inhibit the team process required in surgery. This study examined surgeon-nurse spatial communication in a collaborative surgical task in a controlled experiment. It was hypothesized that providing a spatial communication aid would improve performance time and reduce the amount of communication needed for the task. Fifteen dyads of surgeons or novices completed a simulated organ manipulation task using a laparoscopic trainer box in two viewing conditions: aligned (0°) and rotated (90°) camera view. Subjects were divided into 3 experimental groups: control, cardinal directional aid, and grid directional aid. Results show that experts were faster than novices, and the directional aids significantly facilitated task performance. While the volume of communication was not different across the three groups, there was a shift toward a more collaborative style of communication in the cardinal directions and grid conditions. The findings suggest that spatial communication aids can improve performance and promote collaboration in the robotic operating room.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Johnson ◽  
Naomi Cocks ◽  
Lucy Dipper

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document