Risk Management in German Leasing SMEs—A Qualitative Study

Author(s):  
Christian Glaser
Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 344
Author(s):  
Courtney A. Schultz ◽  
Lauren F. Miller ◽  
Sarah Michelle Greiner ◽  
Chad Kooistra

To support improved wildfire incident decision-making, in 2017 the US Forest Service (Forest Service) implemented risk-informed tools and processes, together known as Risk Management Assistance (RMA). The Forest Service is developing tools such as RMA to improve wildfire decision-making and implements these tools in complex organizational environments. We assessed the perceived value of RMA and factors that affected its use to inform the literature on decision support for fire management. We sought to answer two questions: (1) What was the perceived value of RMA for line officers who received it?; and (2) What factors affected how RMA was received and used during wildland fire events? We conducted a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with decision-makers to understand the contextualized and interrelated factors that affect wildfire decision-making and the uptake of a decision-support intervention such as RMA. We used a thematic coding process to analyze our data according to our questions. RMA increased line officers’ ability to communicate the rationale underlying their decisions more clearly and transparently to their colleagues and partners. Our interviewees generally said that RMA data analytics were valuable but did not lead to changes in their decisions. Line officer personality, pre-season exposure to RMA, local political dynamics and conditions, and decision biases affected the use of RMA. Our findings reveal the complexities of embracing risk management, not only in the context of US federal fire management, but also in other similar emergency management contexts. Attention will need to be paid to existing decision biases, integration of risk management approaches in the interagency context, and the importance of knowledge brokers to connect across internal organizational groups. Our findings contribute to the literature on managing change in public organizations, specifically in emergency decision-making contexts such as fire management.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Denney

<p>Risk management is commonly accepted as a foundational management process to increase the likelihood of project success. Risks can be categorized as either threats (negative events or conditions) or opportunities (positive). This qualitative study explored the positive side of risk management to examine if opportunity management is still underutilized by practitioners, as has been reported in previous studies and standards. Recommendations from this study for improved use of opportunity management include development of: (a) specific training on opportunity management (b) catalog of opportunity examples, and (c) template for the business case for opportunity management. This research provides greater insight to improve the efficacy for current and future project, program, and portfolio managers.</p>


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
Bob Heyman ◽  
Carol Buswell Griffiths ◽  
John L Taylor ◽  
Gregory O'Brien

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Denney

<p>Risk management is commonly accepted as a foundational management process to increase the likelihood of project success. Risks can be categorized as either threats (negative events or conditions) or opportunities (positive). This qualitative study explored the positive side of risk management to examine if opportunity management is still underutilized by practitioners, as has been reported in previous studies and standards. Recommendations from this study for improved use of opportunity management include development of: (a) specific training on opportunity management (b) catalog of opportunity examples, and (c) template for the business case for opportunity management. This research provides greater insight to improve the efficacy for current and future project, program, and portfolio managers.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-197
Author(s):  
Jamileh Farokhzadian ◽  
Amirreza Sabzi ◽  
Nahid Dehghan Nayeri

The aim of this study was to explore nurses’ experiences and viewpoints about the outcomes of effective integration of clinical risk management (CRM) into health care. This qualitative study was conducted using purposive sampling and semistructured interviews with 19 nurses from three hospitals affiliated with a large medical university. Data were analyzed by the conventional qualitative content analysis method proposed by Lundman and Graneheim. Data analysis reflected the following concepts: improving the quality of services and promoting health, preserving and protecting patient safety, increasing satisfaction, improving staff morale, and improving organizational awareness and vigilance. According to the results, CRM with its positive outcomes can help the development of a patient-oriented culture. The results can be a starting point for further quantitative and qualitative research to explore other strategies, potentials, and capacities of quality improvement activities such as CRM in other contexts and cultures.


Author(s):  
Lucilene Da Silva Silva ◽  
Nathanielle Leite Resende ◽  
Carolinne Kilcia Carvalho Sena Damasceno ◽  
Cristina Maria Miranda de Sousa

Objective: To analyze the knowledge of nursing professionals about the Risk Management Process. Method: qualitative study conducted in a public maternity hospital. Data collection took place in June 2018 and was conducted through a semi-structured interview with the participation of 12 nursing professionals. Data were analyzed with the support of IRAMUTEQ Software. Results: the participants knew about risk management, but it was observed difficulties to conceptualize this process and when the actions taken in relation to the identification of a risk situation, they reported that they would trigger the patient's Safety Center, provide immediate assistance, would communicate the doctor/nurse and inform the institution's management through the ombudsman. Final Considerations: Knowledge about risk management is a theme that is far from the reality of some professionals, so it is necessary to improve the disclosure about what is risk management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document