Ankle Dorsiflexion Assistance Using Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation and Actuated Ankle Foot Orthosis

Author(s):  
Carlos Canchola-Hernandez ◽  
Hala Rifai ◽  
Yacine Amirat ◽  
Samer Mohammed
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 688-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Bethoux ◽  
Helen L. Rogers ◽  
Karen J. Nolan ◽  
Gary M. Abrams ◽  
Thiru M. Annaswamy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-314
Author(s):  
Parisa Aslani ◽  
◽  
Alireza Khaghani ◽  
Taher Babaee ◽  
◽  
...  

Objectives: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that is the second leading cause of nerve failure in young adults. One of the clinical manifestations of MS is impaired balance and gait. Ankle-foot Orthosis (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) are the most common rehabilitation interventions to improve the patients’ gait and balance. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of using an FES system and an AFO equipped with FES on the gait and balance of patients with MS. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study. The patients were included in the study who were diagnosed with MS, had a score of lower than five on the expanded disability status scale, had a history of drop foot for at least three months, aged 20-50 years, and prescribed an AFO or FES, or both. The participants were asked to wear the FES system to evaluate their balance and ability to walk using the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest). Then, the participants were asked to wear an AFO equipped with FES, and their balance and ability to walk were assessed again. Results: The AFO equipped with FES provides more gait stability than FES alone condition (P <0.05). The ability of patients to use the FES alone was greater than using the AFO equipped with FES (P<0.05). Discussion: The study results showed that the walking ability of MS patients using an FES system is greater than that of AFO equipped with FES. This outcome can be due to the difficulty and limiting effect of using an orthosis on their performance. However, the patient’s postural response during stepping back and forth in the condition of AFO equipped with the FES system was better than the FES system alone.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Berenpas ◽  
Alexander C. Geurts ◽  
Jasper den Boer ◽  
Roos van Swigchem ◽  
Frans Nollet ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Amna Aamir Khan ◽  
Hassan Abbas ◽  
Rabbia Naseer Ahmed ◽  
Maria Salman

OBJECTIVE Post stroke foot is inability to lift foot at ankle joint due to paralysis of ankle dorsiflexor muscles. It is a common problem faced by stroke survivors. To determine the effect of ankle joint taping combined with functional electrical stimulation on post stroke foot drop. METHODS It was an experimental study. 10 stroke patients with foot drop were enlisted for the study by convenience sampling and randomized into two groups. The group A or treatment group (n-5) received kinesiotaping of ankle joint and functional electrical stimulation while group B or control group (n-5) received functional electrical stimulation only. Clinical assessment was done before and after study. Outcome measures were Manual Muscle Testing, active ankle dorsiflexion and time up and go test. RESULTS Improvement was recorded in both kinesiotaping of ankle joint with functional electrical stimulation and functional electrical stimulation groups for MMT and active range of ankle dorsiflexion and there was no significant improvement in time up and go test. But statistically non-significant difference between both groups is observed (Z=-2.000, p=0.46). CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that there is no clear benefit of ankle joint taping combined with functional electrical stimulation for correction of post stroke foot drop. Keywords: Foot Drop, Functional Electrical Stimulation, Ankle Joint Taping, Kinesiotaping, Dorsiflexion, Manual Muscle Testing


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document