Paraplegia: Prolonged Standing Using Closed-Loop Functional Electrical Stimulation and Andrews Ankle-Foot Orthosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Davis ◽  
Thierry Houdayer ◽  
Brian Andrews ◽  
Andrew Barriskill
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 688-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Bethoux ◽  
Helen L. Rogers ◽  
Karen J. Nolan ◽  
Gary M. Abrams ◽  
Thiru M. Annaswamy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-314
Author(s):  
Parisa Aslani ◽  
◽  
Alireza Khaghani ◽  
Taher Babaee ◽  
◽  
...  

Objectives: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that is the second leading cause of nerve failure in young adults. One of the clinical manifestations of MS is impaired balance and gait. Ankle-foot Orthosis (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) are the most common rehabilitation interventions to improve the patients’ gait and balance. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of using an FES system and an AFO equipped with FES on the gait and balance of patients with MS. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study. The patients were included in the study who were diagnosed with MS, had a score of lower than five on the expanded disability status scale, had a history of drop foot for at least three months, aged 20-50 years, and prescribed an AFO or FES, or both. The participants were asked to wear the FES system to evaluate their balance and ability to walk using the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest). Then, the participants were asked to wear an AFO equipped with FES, and their balance and ability to walk were assessed again. Results: The AFO equipped with FES provides more gait stability than FES alone condition (P <0.05). The ability of patients to use the FES alone was greater than using the AFO equipped with FES (P<0.05). Discussion: The study results showed that the walking ability of MS patients using an FES system is greater than that of AFO equipped with FES. This outcome can be due to the difficulty and limiting effect of using an orthosis on their performance. However, the patient’s postural response during stepping back and forth in the condition of AFO equipped with the FES system was better than the FES system alone.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Berenpas ◽  
Alexander C. Geurts ◽  
Jasper den Boer ◽  
Roos van Swigchem ◽  
Frans Nollet ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHENG-LIANG LIU ◽  
CHUNG-HUANG YU ◽  
SHIH-CHING CHEN ◽  
CHANG-HUNG CHEN

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a method for restoring the functional movements of paraplegic or patients with spinal cord injuries. However, the selection of parameters that control the restoration of standing up and sitting functions has not been extensively investigated. This work provides a method for choosing the four main items involved in evaluating the strategies for sit-stand-sit movements with the aid of a modified walker. The control method uses the arm-supported force and the angles of the legs as feedback signals to change the intensity of the electrical stimulation of the leg muscles. The control parameters, Ki and Kp, are vary for different control strategies. Four items are collected through questionnaires and used for evaluation. They are the maximum reactions of the two hands, the average reaction of the two hands, largest absolute angular velocity of the knee joints, and the sit-stand-sit duration time. The experimental data are normalized to facilitate comparison. Weighting factors are obtained and analyzed from questionnaires answered by experts and are added to evaluation process for manipulation. The results show that the best strategy is the closed-loop control with parameters Ki=0.5 and Kp=0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document