The Effect of the Associative Friction in the Seismic Limit Analysis of Masonry Arches with Uncertain Geometry

Author(s):  
Paolo Zampieri ◽  
Ludovico Rossi ◽  
Nicola Cavalagli ◽  
Vittorio Gusella ◽  
Carlo Pellegrino
2014 ◽  
Vol 624 ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismael Basilio ◽  
Roberto Fedele ◽  
Paulo B. Lourenço ◽  
Gabriele Milani

In this contribution, original limit analysis numerical results are presented dealing with some reinforced masonry arches tested at the University of Minho-UMinho, PT. Twelve in-scale circular masonry arches were considered, reinforced in various ways at the intrados or at the extrados. GFRP reinforcements were applied either on undamaged or on previously damaged elements, in order to assess the role of external reinforcements even in repairing interventions. The experimental results were critically discussed at the light of limit analysis predictions, based on a 3D FE heterogeneous upper bound approach. Satisfactory agreement was found between experimental evidences and the numerical results, in terms of failure mechanisms and peak load.


2017 ◽  
Vol 747 ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerio Alecci ◽  
Francesco Focacci ◽  
Luisa Rovero ◽  
Gianfranco Stipo ◽  
Giovanni Mantegazza ◽  
...  

This paper examines the structural behavior of masonry arches strengthened at the intrados with fabric reinforced cementitions matrix (FRCM) composites. Textiles made of poliparafenilenbenzobisoxazole (PBO) and carbon fibers are considered. The experimental results are compared with those obtained on un-strengthened arches and arches strengthened with a carbon fiber reinforced polymer (C-FRP) composite. The tested arches are analyzed with the approach of the limit analysis of the collapse mechanisms.


2019 ◽  
pp. 201-237
Author(s):  
Pere Roca ◽  
Paulo B. Lourenço ◽  
Angelo Gaetani

2010 ◽  
Vol 133-134 ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Smars

To quantify the safety of masonry arches and vaults using limit-analysis, various types of safety factors have been devised. The most well-known were introduced by Heyman: a “static factor of safety” (or load factor) assessing how vulnerable the structure is to increases in the living loads and a “geometrical factor of safety” assessing how critical the thickness of the structure is for its stability. In non seismic areas, one of the main risks of total or partial collapse of arches and vaults is excessive displacement of the supports (following walls or soil deformation). Limit analysis technique can be used to analyse this risk, quantifying movements permitted before collapse and evolution of the thrust on the supports. This analysis can be combined with pathological investigations and displacement monitoring to study the evolution of the risk and define a “kinematic factor of safety”. A software program was developed (a) to compute domains of stability for particular mechanisms of deformation, (b) to study possibility of transitions between mechanisms during deformation and (c) to interactively study the influence of movements of the supports on thrust and stability. Scaled physical models are used to validate the limit analysis approach, using an experimental rig where horizontal and vertical displacements are controlled by computer. A high-speed camera is used to study transition between mechanisms. Finally it is referred to techniques integrating this kinematic approach into a more general probabilistic approach, taking into account various uncertainties in the structure (shape, thickness, loads, movements).


2019 ◽  
Vol 817 ◽  
pp. 236-243
Author(s):  
Mario Como ◽  
Simona Coccia ◽  
Fabio di Carlo

Aim of this paper is the evaluation of the increasing of the load-carrying capacity of masonry arches strengthened at intrados extrados with poliparafenilenbenzobisoxazole (PBO) fabric reinforced cementitious mortar composite. An analytical procedure is proposed, in the Limit Analysis context, considering two schemes of load: a vertical load applied at the crown of the arch and a horizontal distribution proportional to the weight. The presence of the composite material is introduced by considering a plastic behaviour of the hinges defining the virtual kinematic mechanism compatible with the Limit Analysis hypotheses. Two assumptions on these mechanisms are made: a correct position of the hinges inside the cross-section of the masonry arch or a simplified location at the intrados or at the extrados of the structure. Finally, a parametric survey is carried out in order to understand the influence of the involved parameters on the load-carrying capacity of the strengthened masonry arches.


2017 ◽  
Vol 747 ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Chiozzi ◽  
Gabriele Milani ◽  
Nicola Grillanda ◽  
Antonio Tralli

This contribution is devoted to assess the capability of a new upper-bound approach for the limit analysis of FRP-reinforced masonry arches by comparing it to both experimental tests and a number of existing numerical procedures. The approach is based on an idea previously presented by the Authors and relies on the representation of the geometry of both the arch and of FRP reinforcement through Non Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) functions. This allows generating a rigid body assembly starting from the assigned geometry composed by very few elements which still provide an exact representation of the original shape. A homogenized kinematic formulation for the limit analysis of the obtained rigid blocks assembly is derived, which accounts for the main properties of masonry material. FRP material is included exploiting the Italian CNR Recommendations for the design of FRP based reinforcing interventions. The approach is capable of accurately predicting the load bearing capacity of masonry arches of arbitrary geometry, provided that the initial mesh is adjusted by means of a suitably devised Genetic Algorithm (GA) until the active interfaces among blocks (e.g. hinges) closely approximate the actual failure mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document