Developmental Toxicity

2015 ◽  
pp. 203-218
Author(s):  
Barbara D. Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Toxicity

Developmental toxicity of one marine dinoflagellate toxicant - Saxitoxin

Planta Medica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Tian ◽  
M Wang
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Marine Dinoflagellate

Second-phase validation of developmental toxicity test using embryoid body's area

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hwan Lee ◽  
Seon Mi Park ◽  
Eui-Man Jung ◽  
Eui-Bae Jeung
Keyword(s):  
Toxicity Test ◽  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Second Phase

Developmental Toxicity Potential of Hydroxyuera, a Positive Control, in Rabbits

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie G. Coppes ◽  
Charlotte L. Speckman ◽  
Jr Korte ◽  
Don W.
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Toxicity Potential

scholarly journals Hexavalent chromium amplifies the developmental toxicity of graphene oxide during zebrafish embryogenesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 111487
Author(s):  
Yuming Chen ◽  
Jitong Li ◽  
Qixing Zhou ◽  
Zhijie Liu ◽  
Qiong Li
Keyword(s):  
Graphene Oxide ◽  
Hexavalent Chromium ◽  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Zebrafish Embryogenesis

Characterization of the developmental toxicity of di-n-butyl phthalate in rats

Toxicology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Ema ◽  
Hiro Amano ◽  
Yoshiyuki Ogawa
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Butyl Phthalate

The Use of Biomarkers as Alternatives to Current Animal Tests on Food Chemicals

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-480
Author(s):  
Krys Bottrill
Keyword(s):  
Animal Studies ◽  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Reproductive Toxicity ◽  
In Vitro Test ◽  
Animal Testing ◽  
Dietary Biomarkers ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
The Three Rs

Recent developments in biomarkers relating to the interrelationship of diet, disease and health were surveyed. Most emphasis was placed on biomarkers of deleterious effects, since these are of greatest relevance to the subject of this review. The area of greatest activity was found to be that relating to biomarkers of mutagenic, genotoxic and carcinogenic effects. This is also one of the major areas of concern in considerations of the beneficial and deleterious effects of dietary components, and also the area in which regulatory testing requires studies of the longest duration. A degree of progress has also been made in the identification and development of biomarkers relating to certain classes of target organ toxicity. Biomarkers for other types of toxicity, such as immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity, are less developed, and further investigation in these areas is required before a comprehensive biomarker strategy can be established. A criticism that recurs constantly in the biomarker literature is the lack of standardisation in the methods used, and the lack of reference standards for the purposes of validation and quality control. It is encouraging to note the growing acknowledgement of the need for validation of biomarkers and biomarker assays. Some validation studies have already been initiated. This review puts forward proposals for criteria to be used in biomarker validation. More discussion on this subject is required. It is concluded that the use of biomarkers can, in some cases, facilitate the implementation of the Three Rs with respect to the testing of food chemicals and studies on the effects of diet on health. The greatest potential is seen to be in the refinement of animal testing, in which biomarkers could serve as early and sensitive endpoints, in order to reduce the duration of the studies and also reduce the number of animals required. Biomarkers could also contribute to establishing a mechanistic basis for in vitro test systems and to facilitating their validation and acceptance. Finally, the increased information that could result from the incorporation of biomarker determinations into population studies could reduce the need for supplementary animal studies. This review makes a number of recommendations concerning the prioritisation of future activities on dietary biomarkers in relation to the Three Rs. It is emphasised, however, that further discussions will be required among toxicologists, epidemiologists and others researching the relationship between diet and health.

scholarly journals Palmitoylethanolamide: Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study in Rats

2021 ◽  
pp. 109158182098607
Author(s):  
Narendra S. Deshmukh ◽  
Shailesh Gumaste ◽  
Silma Subah ◽  
Nathasha Omal Bogoda
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Reproductive Toxicity ◽  
Toxicity Study ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Pregnant Rats ◽  
Human Dose ◽  
Adverse Effect Level ◽  
Female Wistar Rats ◽  
Effect Level

Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is an endogenous ethanolamine playing a protective and homeodynamic role in animals and plants. Prenatal developmental toxicity of PEA was tested following oral administration to pregnant female Wistar rats, from days 0 to 19 of gestation, at dosage of 250, 500, or 1,000 mg/kg body weight, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Test Guideline No. 414. On gestation day 20, cesarean sections were performed on the dams, followed by examination of their ovaries and uterine contents. The fetuses were further examined for external, visceral, and skeletal abnormalities. Palmitoylethanolamide did not cause any alterations at any of the given dosages in the measured maternal parameters of systemic toxicity (body weight, food consumption, survival, thyroid functions, organ weight, histopathology), reproductive toxicity (preimplantation and postimplantation losses, uterus weight, number of live/dead implants and early/late resorptions, litter size and weights, number of fetuses, their sex ratio), and fetal external, visceral, or skeletal observations. Any alterations that were recorded were “normal variations” or “minor anomalies,” which were unrelated to treatment with PEA. Under the condition of this prenatal study, the no-observed-adverse-effect level of PEA for maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity, fetotoxicity, and teratogenicity in rats was found to be >1,000 mg/kg body weight/d. It indicates that PEA is well tolerated by and is safe to pregnant rats even at a high dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight/d, equivalent to a human dose of greater than 9.7 g/d. This prenatal developmental toxicity study contributes greatly in building a robust safety profile for PEA.

scholarly journals REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY STUDIES OF PRULIFLOXACIN (NM441) (4) : A Perinatal and Postnatal Study in Rats by Oral Administration

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (SupplementI) ◽  
pp. 219-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tagahiko MORINAGA ◽  
Shigenobu FUJII ◽  
Shigenori FURUKAWA ◽  
Mikito KIKUMORI ◽  
Kimio YASUHIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Toxicity Studies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document