Device Synchronisation: A Practical Limitation on Reader Assisted Jamming Methods for RFID Confidentiality

Author(s):  
Qiao Hu ◽  
Lavinia Mihaela Dinca ◽  
Gerhard Hancke
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 224-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Hu ◽  
Lavinia Mihaela Dinca ◽  
Anjia Yang ◽  
Gerhard Hancke

At this hour after we have had two days of this extremely interesting and exciting Discussion Meeting, I do not want to keep you for very long. I will not even attempt to give you a summary─I cannot at this late hour. What I want to do instead is to give some impression of what this Discussion Meeting has meant to me and what general linking principles I have been able to see in it. Every one of you will also want to make his own evaluation. I feel that the value of a meeting like this is very great because it has brought together, both in the papers and in the discussion, people from hitherto almost exclusively separate disciplines. The metallurgists, the ceramic and glass experts, the polymer chemists and solid-state physicists have met and discussed many topics of common interest to them. We who were concerned with organizing this meeting had to be extremely restrictive to keep the scope within practical bounds. We had to exclude, for instance, all papers dealing with the chemistry of preparation of polymers or those on the different techniques of glass making, and there are other properties, fascinating properties like electrical and optical properties, which could have been touched on had there been more time. We had to stick to a very limited field of properties common to all these new or improved substances, namely, the mechanical properties, and even then not of mechanical properties in general, such as elasti­city. It is quite clear from the way the discussion has gone that only the two major mechanical properties have come into the foreground, one being the yield point or beginning of plasticity, and the other the limit of fracture or total breakdown. These are essentially practical considerations because although the first of these, the yield point, may have some physical meaning, the second is really essentially a practical limitation of the material performance. The presence of preformed cracks, for instance, absolutely limits the use of some materials in different condi­tions of stress.


1983 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. 585
Author(s):  
K. Yoshihiro ◽  
J. Kinoshita ◽  
K. Inagaki ◽  
C. Yamanouchi ◽  
K. Shida ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Simon Dellicour ◽  
Keith Durkin ◽  
Samuel L Hong ◽  
Bert Vanmechelen ◽  
Joan Martí-Carreras ◽  
...  

Abstract Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of genomic sequences of SARS-CoV-2 have been generated and shared with the scientific community. The unparalleled volume of available genetic data presents a unique opportunity to gain real-time insights into the virus transmission during the pandemic, but also a daunting computational hurdle if analyzed with gold-standard phylogeographic approaches. To tackle this practical limitation, we here describe and apply a rapid analytical pipeline to analyze the spatiotemporal dispersal history and dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 lineages. As a proof of concept, we focus on the Belgian epidemic, which has had one of the highest spatial densities of available SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Our pipeline has the potential to be quickly applied to other countries or regions, with key benefits in complementing epidemiological analyses in assessing the impact of intervention measures or their progressive easement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-365
Author(s):  
Belén Pueyo-Ibáñez

Jürgen Habermas’s discourse ethics is a method of intersubjective argumentation conceived to test the validity of moral norms on the basis of their universalizability. As some scholars have argued, Habermas’s proposal is problematic in that the process of argumentation is always affected by the circumstances of inequality and unfairness that pervade communal life and, therefore, it cannot be as inclusive and egalitarian as it needs to be in order to function effectively. In this paper, I argue that the solutions proposed by these scholars, namely, the improvement of social conditions and the pluralization of the process of argumentation, cannot by themselves resolve the practical limitation Habermas’s method presents. As an alternative, I adopt Philip Kitcher’s approach to ethics according to which the establishment of moral norms is oriented not to the resolution of disagreements but to the restitution of healthy relationships among individuals. On the basis of this alternative conception, I propose the addition to Habermas’s principle of universalization of a supplemental criterion of moral justification—one that makes the validity of norms dependent upon their potential to foster altruism.


1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 3198-3200 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. W. Gentle ◽  
R. D. Hazeltine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document