Child Abuse-Non-accidental Trauma (NAT)

2017 ◽  
pp. 393-395
Author(s):  
Melvin C. Makhni ◽  
Eric C. Makhni ◽  
Eric F. Swart ◽  
Charles S. Day
Author(s):  
Patrick T. Delaplain ◽  
Yigit S. Guner ◽  
Corey J. Rood ◽  
Jeffry Nahmias

Abstract Purpose of Review To provide a resource for providers that may be involved in the diagnosis and management of infant non-accidental trauma (NAT). Recent Findings Infants are more likely to both suffer from physical abuse and die from their subsequent injuries. There are missed opportunities among providers for recognizing sentinel injuries. Minority children are overrepresented in the reporting of child maltreatment, and there is systemic bias in the evaluation and treatment of minority victims of child abuse. Summary Unfortunately, no single, primary preventative intervention has been conclusively shown to reduce the incidence of child maltreatment. Standardized algorithms for NAT screening have been shown to increase the bias-free utilization of NAT evaluations. Every healthcare provider that interacts with children has a responsibility to recognize warning signs of NAT, be able to initiate the evaluation for suspected NAT, and understand their role as a mandatory reporter.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 219-220
Author(s):  
Monica L. Melgar ◽  
Jonathan Russin ◽  
Amy P. Bansal ◽  
Mark D. Krieger

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Thackeray ◽  
Peter C. Minneci ◽  
Jennifer N. Cooper ◽  
Jonathan I. Groner ◽  
Katherine J. Deans

2013 ◽  
pp. 399-407
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelgawad ◽  
Osama Naga

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement 1 3S) ◽  
pp. 341-342
Author(s):  
L. Webb ◽  
P. Prabhakaran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document